地理学报
地理學報
지이학보
ACTA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA
2010年
4期
476-484
,共9页
土地压力%缓解途径%生态建设%北方土石山区
土地壓力%緩解途徑%生態建設%北方土石山區
토지압력%완해도경%생태건설%북방토석산구
land pressure%alleviating approaches%environment restoration%mountainous region of northern China
以北方土石山区27个小流域样本数据为基础,针对流域粮食生产、经济发展和生态保护对土地的需求,构建了土地压力定量评估方法,评估了各流域的土地压力,并将其与实际土地生产力进行了比较,进而从各小流域的经验事实中提取出使两者平衡的有效途径.结果表明,土地压力在空间上具有非均衡性,但相对于土地生产力的相对土地压力则存在空间均衡化的趋势.2000年前后,只有76%的样本小流域能够支撑人均300 kg/a的粮食生产压力,只有约20%的样本小流域能够支撑其经济发展压力,但这些小流域的土地压力最终都得到了有效缓解.劳动力转移、发展经济林果和特色产业等是缓解上述压力的主要途径.
以北方土石山區27箇小流域樣本數據為基礎,針對流域糧食生產、經濟髮展和生態保護對土地的需求,構建瞭土地壓力定量評估方法,評估瞭各流域的土地壓力,併將其與實際土地生產力進行瞭比較,進而從各小流域的經驗事實中提取齣使兩者平衡的有效途徑.結果錶明,土地壓力在空間上具有非均衡性,但相對于土地生產力的相對土地壓力則存在空間均衡化的趨勢.2000年前後,隻有76%的樣本小流域能夠支撐人均300 kg/a的糧食生產壓力,隻有約20%的樣本小流域能夠支撐其經濟髮展壓力,但這些小流域的土地壓力最終都得到瞭有效緩解.勞動力轉移、髮展經濟林果和特色產業等是緩解上述壓力的主要途徑.
이북방토석산구27개소류역양본수거위기출,침대류역양식생산、경제발전화생태보호대토지적수구,구건료토지압력정량평고방법,평고료각류역적토지압력,병장기여실제토지생산력진행료비교,진이종각소류역적경험사실중제취출사량자평형적유효도경.결과표명,토지압력재공간상구유비균형성,단상대우토지생산력적상대토지압력칙존재공간균형화적추세.2000년전후,지유76%적양본소류역능구지탱인균300 kg/a적양식생산압력,지유약20%적양본소류역능구지탱기경제발전압력,단저사소류역적토지압력최종도득도료유효완해.노동력전이、발전경제림과화특색산업등시완해상술압력적주요도경.
The mountainous region of northern China including mountain areas in the Haihe and Huaihe drainage basins covers an area of 28 × 10~4 km~2, where soil erosion is the overwhelming environment issue. Since the 1950s, soil and water conservation projects, such as those based on small watersheds, have partly improved the situation of soil erosion, but there is still 13.47 × 10~4 km~2 of eroded area due to land use and land cover changes under the pressures of both population growth and economic development. Therefore, to alleviate regional land pressure becomes more important in the restoration of regional environment. In this paper, we evaluate the grain production pressures, economic development pressures and soil conservation pressures for 27 sample watersheds listed in those soil conservation projects, and then compare their land pressures and actual production abilities to find out which alleviating approaches were adopted and which approach performed the most important. Empirical analysis reveals that land pressure was spatially non-balanced, but there was a balancing trend between land pressure and production ability. If none of alleviating approaches had been adopted, only 76% of the watersheds could bear grain production of 300 kg/a per capita, another 24% of the watersheds could only bear grain production of 225 kg/a per capita, while about 18% of the watersheds could bear their economic development pressure that is equal to average labors' alternative cost. Out-migration of labors, fruit production and locally specified tour were the major approaches to alleviate land use pressures, and labors migration performed the most important. Those approaches alleviated not only grain production pressures and economic development pressures of the watersheds, but also soil conservation pressures.