中华糖尿病杂志
中華糖尿病雜誌
중화당뇨병잡지
CHINES JOURNAL OF DLABETES MELLITUS
2012年
9期
523-528
,共6页
周健%包玉倩%马晓静%陆蔚%郝亚平%周密%莫一菲%胡承%项坤三%贾伟平
週健%包玉倩%馬曉靜%陸蔚%郝亞平%週密%莫一菲%鬍承%項坤三%賈偉平
주건%포옥천%마효정%륙위%학아평%주밀%막일비%호승%항곤삼%가위평
糖尿病,2型%动态血糖监测%误差栅格分析%准确度
糖尿病,2型%動態血糖鑑測%誤差柵格分析%準確度
당뇨병,2형%동태혈당감측%오차책격분석%준학도
Diabetes mellitus,type 2%Continuous glucose monitoring%Error grid analysis%Accuracy
目的 应用频繁静脉取血法在2型糖尿病患者中对回顾性动态血糖监测系统(CGMS)的点准确度及趋势准确度进行评价.方法 2010年8月至10月共纳入11例2型糖尿病患者,应用美敦力公司GOLDTM (GMS)连续监测3d血糖,同时每天输入4次指尖血糖值进行校正.受试者在CGMS监测的3 d内随机选择1d参加连续7h的频繁静脉取血(15 min取1次),并用美国YSI STAT PlusTM葡萄糖乳酸分析仪(YSI值)进行血浆葡萄糖值的测定.应用多种统计方法和统计量来综合进行准确性评估,包括CGMS值和匹配的YSI值相比在20%和30%偏差范围内的一致率、误差栅格分析、绝对差值的相对数(ARD)、Bland-Altman分析以及趋势分析等.两变量相关分析采用Pearson相关分析.结果 11例患者共收集到319对YSI-CGMS配对数据值;与YSI值相比,88.4% (95% CI:0.84~0.92)的CGMS值在20%偏差范围内,96.9%的CGMS值在30%偏差范围内.Clarke误差栅格分析显示YSI-CGMS配对数据值进入A区和B区的比例分别为88%、12%,共识误差栅格分析显示进入A区和B区的比例分别为96.2%、3.8%.连续误差栅格分析显示YSI-CGMS配对数据值在准确数据区、良性错误区及错误数据区分别为94.4%、2.8%及2.8%.ARD的均值为10.5%,中位数为8.4%,Bland-Altman分析均值为0.47 mmol/L(95% CI:- 1.90 ~3.01).趋势分析显示82.5%的两者变化率差异集中在0.06 mmol·L-1·min -1的变化范围内,只有1.7%的数据对绝对差异超过0.17 mmol·L-1·min-1.结论 无论对点时血糖还是对血糖变化趋势的反映,CGMS均有较好的准确性;但对低血糖事件进行评判时,尚需结合临床实际情况具体分析.
目的 應用頻繁靜脈取血法在2型糖尿病患者中對迴顧性動態血糖鑑測繫統(CGMS)的點準確度及趨勢準確度進行評價.方法 2010年8月至10月共納入11例2型糖尿病患者,應用美敦力公司GOLDTM (GMS)連續鑑測3d血糖,同時每天輸入4次指尖血糖值進行校正.受試者在CGMS鑑測的3 d內隨機選擇1d參加連續7h的頻繁靜脈取血(15 min取1次),併用美國YSI STAT PlusTM葡萄糖乳痠分析儀(YSI值)進行血漿葡萄糖值的測定.應用多種統計方法和統計量來綜閤進行準確性評估,包括CGMS值和匹配的YSI值相比在20%和30%偏差範圍內的一緻率、誤差柵格分析、絕對差值的相對數(ARD)、Bland-Altman分析以及趨勢分析等.兩變量相關分析採用Pearson相關分析.結果 11例患者共收集到319對YSI-CGMS配對數據值;與YSI值相比,88.4% (95% CI:0.84~0.92)的CGMS值在20%偏差範圍內,96.9%的CGMS值在30%偏差範圍內.Clarke誤差柵格分析顯示YSI-CGMS配對數據值進入A區和B區的比例分彆為88%、12%,共識誤差柵格分析顯示進入A區和B區的比例分彆為96.2%、3.8%.連續誤差柵格分析顯示YSI-CGMS配對數據值在準確數據區、良性錯誤區及錯誤數據區分彆為94.4%、2.8%及2.8%.ARD的均值為10.5%,中位數為8.4%,Bland-Altman分析均值為0.47 mmol/L(95% CI:- 1.90 ~3.01).趨勢分析顯示82.5%的兩者變化率差異集中在0.06 mmol·L-1·min -1的變化範圍內,隻有1.7%的數據對絕對差異超過0.17 mmol·L-1·min-1.結論 無論對點時血糖還是對血糖變化趨勢的反映,CGMS均有較好的準確性;但對低血糖事件進行評判時,尚需結閤臨床實際情況具體分析.
목적 응용빈번정맥취혈법재2형당뇨병환자중대회고성동태혈당감측계통(CGMS)적점준학도급추세준학도진행평개.방법 2010년8월지10월공납입11례2형당뇨병환자,응용미돈력공사GOLDTM (GMS)련속감측3d혈당,동시매천수입4차지첨혈당치진행교정.수시자재CGMS감측적3 d내수궤선택1d삼가련속7h적빈번정맥취혈(15 min취1차),병용미국YSI STAT PlusTM포도당유산분석의(YSI치)진행혈장포도당치적측정.응용다충통계방법화통계량래종합진행준학성평고,포괄CGMS치화필배적YSI치상비재20%화30%편차범위내적일치솔、오차책격분석、절대차치적상대수(ARD)、Bland-Altman분석이급추세분석등.량변량상관분석채용Pearson상관분석.결과 11례환자공수집도319대YSI-CGMS배대수거치;여YSI치상비,88.4% (95% CI:0.84~0.92)적CGMS치재20%편차범위내,96.9%적CGMS치재30%편차범위내.Clarke오차책격분석현시YSI-CGMS배대수거치진입A구화B구적비례분별위88%、12%,공식오차책격분석현시진입A구화B구적비례분별위96.2%、3.8%.련속오차책격분석현시YSI-CGMS배대수거치재준학수거구、량성착오구급착오수거구분별위94.4%、2.8%급2.8%.ARD적균치위10.5%,중위수위8.4%,Bland-Altman분석균치위0.47 mmol/L(95% CI:- 1.90 ~3.01).추세분석현시82.5%적량자변화솔차이집중재0.06 mmol·L-1·min -1적변화범위내,지유1.7%적수거대절대차이초과0.17 mmol·L-1·min-1.결론 무론대점시혈당환시대혈당변화추세적반영,CGMS균유교호적준학성;단대저혈당사건진행평판시,상수결합림상실제정황구체분석.
Objective To assess the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in type 2 diabetic patients by frequent venous blood collection.Methods A total of 11 patients with type 2 diabetes treated from August to October 2010 were enrolled in this study.The Medtronic GOLDTM CGMS was used to monitor the continuous changes of the blood glucose levels for 3 successive days in all subjects,meanwhile the fingertip blood glucose was tested at least 4 times each day for calibration.The venous blood of the subjects was randomly collected every 15 min per hour for 7 successive hours on one day when the subjects wore the sensor,and was tested using the YSI 2300 STAT PlusTM glucose&lactate analyzer.The accuracy was comprehensively evaluated by using statistical methods including the rate of agreement between the sensor readings and the paired YSI values within ± 20% and ± 30% of deviations,the error grid analysis,absolute relative difference (ARD), Bland-Altman analysis and trend analysis. Correlation analysis of two variables was done with Pearson correlation analysis. Results A total of 319 paired YSI-sensor values were collected from the 11 patients.Total 88.4% of the sensor readings (95% CI:0.84-0.92) were within ±20% of the YSI values,and 96.9% within ±30% of the YSI values.Clarke error grid analyses showed that the ratios of the YSI-sensor values in region A to region B were 88% and 12% ;Consensus error grid analyses showed that the ratios of the YSI-sensor values in region A to region B were 96.2% and 3.8% ; Continuous error grid analyses showed that the ratios of the YSI-sensor values in region of accurate reading,benign errors,erroneous reading were 94.4%,2.8%,2.8%,respectively.The mean ARD for all subjects was 10.5% and the median ARD was 8.4%. The Bland-Altman analysis detected the mean blood glucose level of 0.47 mmol/L (95% CI:- 1.90-3.01 mmol/L).Trend analysis revealed that 82.5% of the difference of the rates of change between the YSI values and sensor readings occurred within the range of 0.06 mmol · L-1 · min -1,and only 1.7% of the absolute differences of the paired values were more than 0.17 mmol · L-1 · min-1.Conclusions The CGMS has high accuracy both in monitoring the blood glucose at a specific time and reflecting the trend of changes of the blood glucose level. However,actual clinical manifestations should be taken into account for diagnosis of hypoglycemia.