CAJ | 학술논문

目的修订编制军事群体心理应激的预警检测工具,完善军事群体心理应激预警标准,扩大适用范围,使其适用不同军兵种的应激情境.方法在原问卷编制验证适用于空降兵应激预警检测基础上,重新编写条目,增加条目的数量,扩充维度,修改评分方法和预警标准,在不同军兵、不同应激情境下进行3次独立样本的预测验,运用项目分析对条目进行调整,形成最终的量表,进行信、效度检验,制订预警标准并验证.结果共选编44个条目形成初始量表,经检验入选最终量表有32个条目.信度:全量表的克伦巴赫系数为0.93,Spearman-Brown分半信度系数为0.90,相隔2周的重测信度为0.82.结构效度:2次独立样本的因素分析表明32个条目分为6个维度,累积方差贡献率分别为60.30%和59.94%,因子负荷均在0.4以上.同时效度:本量表与SCL-90、SAS和SDS呈负相关,相关系数分别为-0.55、-0.43和-0.58.预测效度:结果显示达到本量表的预警标准的排实际跳伞时SCL-90、SAS和SDS得分均高于未达预警标准的排.结论本问卷具有较高的信度,较好的结构效度、同时指标及预警区分度,能够作为军事群体心理应激的预警检测工具使用.
목적 수정편제군사군체심리응격적예경검측공구,완선군사군체심리응격예경표준,확대괄용범위,사기괄용불동군병충적응격정경.방법 재원문권편제험증괄용우공강병응격예경검측기출상,중신편사조목,증가조목적 수량,확충유도,수개평분방법화예경표준,재불동군병、불동응격정경하진행3차독립양본적예측험,운용항목분석대조목진행조정,형성최종적량표,진행신、효도검험,제정예경표준병험증.결과 공선편44개조목형성초시량표,경검험입선최종량표유32개조목.신도:전량표적극륜파혁계수위0.93,Spearman-Brown분반신도계수위0.90,상격2주적중측신도위0.82.결구효도:2차독립양본적인소분석표명32개조목분위6개유도,루적방차공헌솔분별위60.30%화59.94%,인자부하균재0.4이상.동시효도:본량표여SCL-90、SAS화SDS정부상관,상관계수분별위-0.55、-0.43화-0.58.예측효도:결과현시체도본량표적예경표준적배실제도산시SCL-90、SAS화SDS득분균고우미체예경표준적배.결론 본문권구유교고적신도,교호적결구효도、동시지표급예경구분도,능구작위군사군체심리응격적예경검측공구사용.
Objective To validate revised and developing and extend apply scope of a test of alerting and perfect criterion for military group stress could alert the bad stress of military group and influence factors could apply to the different military group in different environments. Methods Based on the alerting military group psychological stress of parachute jump of parachute soldiers. After the questionnaire was confirmed initially, we made a test through the three independent samples among the different military group in different environments. After the testing of reliability and validity and the item analysis,the methods of estimation were modified and added some items and dimensions and in order to make the questionnaire more perfectly. Results Forty-four items were selected in the draft. Twenty-eight were included in the initial questionnaire. Reliability: this questionnaire has been found to have moderately acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.93;Spearman-Brown split half reliability= 0.90; Two weeks test-retest reliability= 0.82). Construct-related validity: the results of factor analysis for the two independent samples were quite similar.Thirty-two items were divided into six common factors. Total variance explained by the six factors was 60.30% and 59.94%, respectively, and all the factor loadings were above 0.4.Concurrent validity: this scale total score were negatively correlated with SCL-90 (-0.55), SAS (-0.43) and SDS (-0.58). Predictive validity: the predictive validity of this tool has been established. Parachute soldiers who got higher total score in this questionnaire had been gotten better military training performance than those who got lower total score in this questionnaire. Conclusion The reliability, structure validity, concurrent validity and alerting discrimination of the developed questionnaire were satisfying. The questionnaire could be used in alerting the psychological stress of military group.