国际麻醉学与复苏杂志
國際痳醉學與複囌雜誌
국제마취학여복소잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION
2012年
6期
373-376
,共4页
周海滨%吴安石%徐诚实%穆小波%岳云
週海濱%吳安石%徐誠實%穆小波%嶽雲
주해빈%오안석%서성실%목소파%악운
超声显像%臂丛%神经阻滞
超聲顯像%臂叢%神經阻滯
초성현상%비총%신경조체
Ultrasonagraphy%Braehial plexus%Nerve block
目的 比较超声引导肌间沟臂丛阻滞方式对麻醉效果的影响.方法 选择拟行肩部或上肢手术的患者90例,ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,用随机数字表法随机分成3组(每组30例),用0.5%的罗哌卡因进行肌间沟臂丛阻滞.S组:超声引导单点注射组;M组:超声引导多点注射组;R组:超声引导减药注射组.S组和M组各给予0.5%的罗哌卡因30 ml,R组臂丛各干均被局麻药包裹呈“甜圈征”即停止局麻药注射.结果 S组前臂内侧皮神经、臂内皮神经平均起效时间(92±3.1) min和(10.6±2.8)min明显长于M组(7.6±2.3) min和(6.0±2.2) min和R组(8.2±2.6) min和(7.6±2.7) min;S组臂内皮神经阻滞完善率(60%)明显低于M 组(100%)和R组(94.3%);M组并发症发生率(60%)明显高于S组(20%).结论 超声引导多点肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞可以加快前臂内侧皮神经和臂内侧皮神经起效时间,提高臂丛阻滞完善率,但与单点和减药注射组相比并发症发生率增加.
目的 比較超聲引導肌間溝臂叢阻滯方式對痳醉效果的影響.方法 選擇擬行肩部或上肢手術的患者90例,ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ級,用隨機數字錶法隨機分成3組(每組30例),用0.5%的囉哌卡因進行肌間溝臂叢阻滯.S組:超聲引導單點註射組;M組:超聲引導多點註射組;R組:超聲引導減藥註射組.S組和M組各給予0.5%的囉哌卡因30 ml,R組臂叢各榦均被跼痳藥包裹呈“甜圈徵”即停止跼痳藥註射.結果 S組前臂內側皮神經、臂內皮神經平均起效時間(92±3.1) min和(10.6±2.8)min明顯長于M組(7.6±2.3) min和(6.0±2.2) min和R組(8.2±2.6) min和(7.6±2.7) min;S組臂內皮神經阻滯完善率(60%)明顯低于M 組(100%)和R組(94.3%);M組併髮癥髮生率(60%)明顯高于S組(20%).結論 超聲引導多點肌間溝臂叢神經阻滯可以加快前臂內側皮神經和臂內側皮神經起效時間,提高臂叢阻滯完善率,但與單點和減藥註射組相比併髮癥髮生率增加.
목적 비교초성인도기간구비총조체방식대마취효과적영향.방법 선택의행견부혹상지수술적환자90례,ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ급,용수궤수자표법수궤분성3조(매조30례),용0.5%적라고잡인진행기간구비총조체.S조:초성인도단점주사조;M조:초성인도다점주사조;R조:초성인도감약주사조.S조화M조각급여0.5%적라고잡인30 ml,R조비총각간균피국마약포과정“첨권정”즉정지국마약주사.결과 S조전비내측피신경、비내피신경평균기효시간(92±3.1) min화(10.6±2.8)min명현장우M조(7.6±2.3) min화(6.0±2.2) min화R조(8.2±2.6) min화(7.6±2.7) min;S조비내피신경조체완선솔(60%)명현저우M 조(100%)화R조(94.3%);M조병발증발생솔(60%)명현고우S조(20%).결론 초성인도다점기간구비총신경조체가이가쾌전비내측피신경화비내측피신경기효시간,제고비총조체완선솔,단여단점화감약주사조상비병발증발생솔증가.
Objective To compare the effect of interscalene brachial plexus block using three kinds of uhrasound-guidedinjection methods.Methods Ninety ASA Ⅰ -Ⅱ patients scheduled for surgery of the shoulder or the upper extremity were randomly divided into three groups (n=30),S group:ultrasound-guided and single-point-injection group,M group:ultrasound-guided and three-point-injection group,R group:ultrasound-guided multiple injection group using as little local anesthetic as assessed by sonography that the nerve was soaked by local anesthetic.A total dose of 30 ml ropivocaine was injected in the S and M group.In the R group,if the stems of brachial plexus were coated to show "donut sign",then we stopped injecting local anesthetic.Results The average onset time of sensory blockade on the area innervated by the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve and the medial brachial cutaneous nerve in the M group (7.6±2.3) min and (6.0±2.2) min and R group (8.2+2.6) min and (7.6+2.7) min was significantly shorter than that in the S group (9.2+3.1) min and (10.6±2.8) min.The rate of satisfactory sensory blockade on the area innervated by the medial brachial cutaneous nerve in the S group (60%) was significantly lower than in the M group (100%) and R (94.3%).The incidence of complications in the M group (60%) was significantly higher than in the S group (20%).Conclusions The ultrasound-guided multi-point interscalene brachial plexus nerve block can speed up the block onset time of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve and the medial brachial cutaneous nerve and improve the success rate of interscalene brachial plexus nerve block.Multi-point injection of local anesthetic can increase the incidence of complications.