CAJ | 학술논문

在循环优化计算的基础上，对基本型直燃式串联三效溴化锂吸收式制冷循环和带蒸汽压缩装置的三效制冷循环进行了对比分析。分析结果显示，在选择合适的蒸汽压缩比提前下，带蒸汽压缩装置的三效制冷循环可以获得比基本的直燃型串联三效溴化锂吸收式制冷循环更高的循环COP值，并可将最高溶液温度降低至低于200℃，是一种颇具市场前景的制冷循环。
재순배우화계산적기출상，대기본형직연식천련삼효추화리흡수식제랭순배화대증기압축장치적삼효제랭순배진행료대비분석。분석결과현시，재선택합괄적증기압축비제전하，대증기압축장치적삼효제랭순배가이획득비기본적직연형천련삼효추화리흡수식제랭순배경고적순배COP치，병가장최고용액온도강저지저우200℃，시일충파구시장전경적제랭순배。
Based on the optimal simulation, a comparison of the normallithium bromide triple-effect absorption cycle with series solution circuit and the same cycle with an additional vapor compression device has been carried out. Analysis shows that the latter can achieve a higher COP than the former, furthermore, it can notably reduce the highest temperature of solution in the cycle to a value lower than 200℃. Such kind of triple-effect absorption cycle will have a broad marketing prospect.