成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)
成都理工大學學報(自然科學版)
성도리공대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF CHENGDU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITION)
2010年
1期
110-112
,共3页
放射性污染%地下水%迁移方程%衰变项(-λ C)
放射性汙染%地下水%遷移方程%衰變項(-λ C)
방사성오염%지하수%천이방정%쇠변항(-λ C)
radioactive wastes%groundwater%transport equation%decay term (-λC)
文献中,放射性污染物在地下水中有吸附迁移方程的衰变项,表示为:-λ C R_d.该形式是在将吸附相质量与溶解相质量加和后一并考虑;或者是将吸附相与溶解相的质量变化都包含在质量守恒方程中导出的.这种观点及方法,忽视了在局部平衡假设成立条件下,吸附分配系数(K_d)和滞留系数(R_d)为定值的事实,误将吸附相也作为迁移组分;还忽略了使用质量守恒定律时,必须以溶质具备示踪剂性质为前提条件.所以,表达式中的"-λ C R_d"有误.实际上,在平衡状态下,吸附相不迁移,吸附作用使地下水净化.吸附相的衰变作用与迁移方程的衰变项无关.衰变项是指地下水中污染溶质的衰变作用,其数学表达式应为:(δ)C/(δ)t=-λ C,而不是-λ C R_d.后者会造成虚假的衰变影响,从而导致环境安全评价存在重大失误隐患.
文獻中,放射性汙染物在地下水中有吸附遷移方程的衰變項,錶示為:-λ C R_d.該形式是在將吸附相質量與溶解相質量加和後一併攷慮;或者是將吸附相與溶解相的質量變化都包含在質量守恆方程中導齣的.這種觀點及方法,忽視瞭在跼部平衡假設成立條件下,吸附分配繫數(K_d)和滯留繫數(R_d)為定值的事實,誤將吸附相也作為遷移組分;還忽略瞭使用質量守恆定律時,必鬚以溶質具備示蹤劑性質為前提條件.所以,錶達式中的"-λ C R_d"有誤.實際上,在平衡狀態下,吸附相不遷移,吸附作用使地下水淨化.吸附相的衰變作用與遷移方程的衰變項無關.衰變項是指地下水中汙染溶質的衰變作用,其數學錶達式應為:(δ)C/(δ)t=-λ C,而不是-λ C R_d.後者會造成虛假的衰變影響,從而導緻環境安全評價存在重大失誤隱患.
문헌중,방사성오염물재지하수중유흡부천이방정적쇠변항,표시위:-λ C R_d.해형식시재장흡부상질량여용해상질량가화후일병고필;혹자시장흡부상여용해상적질량변화도포함재질량수항방정중도출적.저충관점급방법,홀시료재국부평형가설성립조건하,흡부분배계수(K_d)화체류계수(R_d)위정치적사실,오장흡부상야작위천이조분;환홀략료사용질량수항정률시,필수이용질구비시종제성질위전제조건.소이,표체식중적"-λ C R_d"유오.실제상,재평형상태하,흡부상불천이,흡부작용사지하수정화.흡부상적쇠변작용여천이방정적쇠변항무관.쇠변항시지지하수중오염용질적쇠변작용,기수학표체식응위:(δ)C/(δ)t=-λ C,이불시-λ C R_d.후자회조성허가적쇠변영향,종이도치배경안전평개존재중대실오은환.
In the literature, the decay term of adsorptive radioactive wastes is expressed as "-λCR_d" in the groundwater transport equation. This expression accounts for the sum of the adsorption mass and the dissolved phase mass, or includes the mass change of the adsorption and the dissolved phase in the mass conservation equation. This viewpoint and the measure overlook the fact that under the assumption of the local equilibrium, the partition coefficient of adsorption (K_d) and the retarded coefficient (R_d) are fixed values, mistake the adsorption phase for transport constituents, and lose sight of that when the mass conservation equation is used the precondition is that the solute must have the characters of the trace reagent. Therefore, the expression of -λCR_d is wrong. In fact, in the equilibrium state, the adsorption phase does not transport, and adsorption effect will clean the groundwater. The decay effect of the adsorption phase is independent of the decay term in the transport equation. The decay term is the decay effect of the contaminative solute, thus the math expression should be ((δ)C)/((δ)t)=-λC in stead of -λCR_d. The latter has a false decay influence that will lead to magnitude hidden trouble in the safety evaluation of the environment.