重庆医科大学学报
重慶醫科大學學報
중경의과대학학보
UNIVERSITATIS SCIENTIAE MEDICINAE CHONGQING
2009年
12期
1740-1742
,共3页
静脉肾盂造影%非加压法%价值
靜脈腎盂造影%非加壓法%價值
정맥신우조영%비가압법%개치
Intravenous pyelography%Nonpressurized%Value
目的:回顾性研究获取高质量的静脉肾盂造影(Intravenous pyelography,IVP)影像资料的最佳技术方法以保障全面、准确的诊断.方法:研究组为非加压法IVP 300例,其中头低足高位100例,动态头低足高体位100例、低张常规位100例;100例常规加压法VIP作为对照组.由高年资技术人员与副高级职称医生对两组显影效果、图像质量、诊断要求进行评价,相关数据进行统计学处理.结果:研究组300例因无加压痛苦,全部顺利完成符合诊断要求的VIP检查;对照组100例因年老、体弱、肥胖、下腹部病变等不能承受腹部加压而于检查中途解压以至于无法达到诊断要求者达5%(5/100)、图像欠佳影响诊断者13%(13/100).研究组300例.肾盂肾盏、肾盂输尿管连接部和输尿管全程清晰显示为93.7%(281/300),显示欠佳但达到诊断要求6.3%(19/300).研究组因诊断要求需改变体位多角度摄片以显示病变细节11.7%(35/300);对照组需要多角度摄片而无法完成7%(7/100).尿路全程显影率:研究组93.7%(281/300),对照组43%(43/100),二者差异具有显著性检验意义(P<0.01).结论:非加压法IVP具有免除加压痛苦、清晰显示解剖、病变细节、尿路全程显示率明显高于加压法等优点,优于加压法.
目的:迴顧性研究穫取高質量的靜脈腎盂造影(Intravenous pyelography,IVP)影像資料的最佳技術方法以保障全麵、準確的診斷.方法:研究組為非加壓法IVP 300例,其中頭低足高位100例,動態頭低足高體位100例、低張常規位100例;100例常規加壓法VIP作為對照組.由高年資技術人員與副高級職稱醫生對兩組顯影效果、圖像質量、診斷要求進行評價,相關數據進行統計學處理.結果:研究組300例因無加壓痛苦,全部順利完成符閤診斷要求的VIP檢查;對照組100例因年老、體弱、肥胖、下腹部病變等不能承受腹部加壓而于檢查中途解壓以至于無法達到診斷要求者達5%(5/100)、圖像欠佳影響診斷者13%(13/100).研究組300例.腎盂腎盞、腎盂輸尿管連接部和輸尿管全程清晰顯示為93.7%(281/300),顯示欠佳但達到診斷要求6.3%(19/300).研究組因診斷要求需改變體位多角度攝片以顯示病變細節11.7%(35/300);對照組需要多角度攝片而無法完成7%(7/100).尿路全程顯影率:研究組93.7%(281/300),對照組43%(43/100),二者差異具有顯著性檢驗意義(P<0.01).結論:非加壓法IVP具有免除加壓痛苦、清晰顯示解剖、病變細節、尿路全程顯示率明顯高于加壓法等優點,優于加壓法.
목적:회고성연구획취고질량적정맥신우조영(Intravenous pyelography,IVP)영상자료적최가기술방법이보장전면、준학적진단.방법:연구조위비가압법IVP 300례,기중두저족고위100례,동태두저족고체위100례、저장상규위100례;100례상규가압법VIP작위대조조.유고년자기술인원여부고급직칭의생대량조현영효과、도상질량、진단요구진행평개,상관수거진행통계학처리.결과:연구조300례인무가압통고,전부순리완성부합진단요구적VIP검사;대조조100례인년로、체약、비반、하복부병변등불능승수복부가압이우검사중도해압이지우무법체도진단요구자체5%(5/100)、도상흠가영향진단자13%(13/100).연구조300례.신우신잔、신우수뇨관련접부화수뇨관전정청석현시위93.7%(281/300),현시흠가단체도진단요구6.3%(19/300).연구조인진단요구수개변체위다각도섭편이현시병변세절11.7%(35/300);대조조수요다각도섭편이무법완성7%(7/100).뇨로전정현영솔:연구조93.7%(281/300),대조조43%(43/100),이자차이구유현저성검험의의(P<0.01).결론:비가압법IVP구유면제가압통고、청석현시해부、병변세절、뇨로전정현시솔명현고우가압법등우점,우우가압법.
Objectiye:To study the best technological methods for high quality intravenous pyelography(IVP). Methods: 300 patients un-dergoing nonpressurized IVP were chosen as study group; 100 patients undergoing routine pressurized IVP were chosen as control group.The visualization effect and imaging quality of two groups were evaluated by senior technologist and doctor, and related data were processed statistically. Results: All of the 300 patients in the study group completed the examination successfully and painlessly. Of the 100 patients in the control group, 5% (5/100) did not meet the diagnostic requirements .because they could not stand the pressurization because of old age, weakness, obesity and pelvis lesions,and had to be decompressed; 13%( 13/100) cases with poor image quality influenced the diag- nostic results. In the study group, 93.7%(281/300) cases were with clear visualization of pelvis and renal calices, conjunction of pelvis and the ureter, and the whole course of ureter. The remaining 6.3%( 19/300)were with not-very-well visualization of the urinary system but met the diagnostic requirements. 11.7%( 35/300) patients in the study group needed to change position to gain multi-angle photographs for visualization of the details of the lesions, while 7%(7/100) patients in the control group needed multi-angle photographs but could not complete the examination. There was a significant difference in the whole course visualization of the urinary system (P<0.01, 93.7% in the study group vs. 43% in the control group). Conclusion: Non-pressurized IVP is better than pressurized IVP with advantage of painless- ness , clear visualization of the anatomy of the whole course of the urinary system and details of lesions.