中国地方病学杂志
中國地方病學雜誌
중국지방병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ENDEMIOLOGY
2008年
2期
194-195
,共2页
原春生%余波%张莉%侯国强%刘洋%李晓红%银恭举
原春生%餘波%張莉%侯國彊%劉洋%李曉紅%銀恭舉
원춘생%여파%장리%후국강%류양%리효홍%은공거
饮水%安全%监测
飲水%安全%鑑測
음수%안전%감측
Dringking%Safety%Surveillance
目的 了解许昌、平顶山和南阳市农村饮水安全工程的供水质量和运行管理现状,科学地评价饮水安全工程的社会效果.方法 按县、乡、村分层抽样,抽验县不少于任务县(市、区)数的50%(13/24),每县(市、区)抽验乡不少于任务乡的40%(42/102),每乡抽验村不少于任务村的30%(56/186);采用"听汇报、查档案、看工程、评等级"的方式进行.结果 95%(129/136)以上的工程在建设前后都有水质检验报告;检验报告90%(122/136)由县级疾病预防控制中心出具;检测的水样75%(102/136)由疾病预防控制部门或卫生监督部门采集;在工程竣工验收时,80%(109/136)的县(市、区)组织了联合验收小组;92%(125/136)的工程建成后水源地保护良好.结论 农村饮水安全工程建设、管理基本规范,供水基本合格,实现了预期目的,但各部门之间职责不够明确,沟通不够通畅,需今后加强协作,各负其责.
目的 瞭解許昌、平頂山和南暘市農村飲水安全工程的供水質量和運行管理現狀,科學地評價飲水安全工程的社會效果.方法 按縣、鄉、村分層抽樣,抽驗縣不少于任務縣(市、區)數的50%(13/24),每縣(市、區)抽驗鄉不少于任務鄉的40%(42/102),每鄉抽驗村不少于任務村的30%(56/186);採用"聽彙報、查檔案、看工程、評等級"的方式進行.結果 95%(129/136)以上的工程在建設前後都有水質檢驗報告;檢驗報告90%(122/136)由縣級疾病預防控製中心齣具;檢測的水樣75%(102/136)由疾病預防控製部門或衛生鑑督部門採集;在工程竣工驗收時,80%(109/136)的縣(市、區)組織瞭聯閤驗收小組;92%(125/136)的工程建成後水源地保護良好.結論 農村飲水安全工程建設、管理基本規範,供水基本閤格,實現瞭預期目的,但各部門之間職責不夠明確,溝通不夠通暢,需今後加彊協作,各負其責.
목적 료해허창、평정산화남양시농촌음수안전공정적공수질량화운행관리현상,과학지평개음수안전공정적사회효과.방법 안현、향、촌분층추양,추험현불소우임무현(시、구)수적50%(13/24),매현(시、구)추험향불소우임무향적40%(42/102),매향추험촌불소우임무촌적30%(56/186);채용"은회보、사당안、간공정、평등급"적방식진행.결과 95%(129/136)이상적공정재건설전후도유수질검험보고;검험보고90%(122/136)유현급질병예방공제중심출구;검측적수양75%(102/136)유질병예방공제부문혹위생감독부문채집;재공정준공험수시,80%(109/136)적현(시、구)조직료연합험수소조;92%(125/136)적공정건성후수원지보호량호.결론 농촌음수안전공정건설、관리기본규범,공수기본합격,실현료예기목적,단각부문지간직책불구명학,구통불구통창,수금후가강협작,각부기책.
Objective To investigate the water quality and running status of the dringking water improving project in Xuchang,Pingdingshan and Nanyang,thus to provide basis for scientifically evaluating social effects.Methods Stratified sampling was used in the levels of counties and townships and villages,with the number of checked counties greater than or eaquel to half of the projected counties(13/24),the checked townships more than 40 percent of the projected townships(42/102),the checked villages greater than or eaquel to 30% of the projected villages(56/186).We listened their statement,reviewed the documents,examined carefully the water projects before we made the appraisal.Results More than 95%(129/136)of the projects had water quality reports,among which 90%(122/136)were provided by county level centers for disease prevention and control,75% (102/136) of water samples were collected by centers for disease prevention and control,80%(109/136)ofcounties organized an acceptance check-up group,92%(125/136)projects well preserved water source.Conclusions The dringking water improvement projeets in countryside are basically normal in terms of construction and management,the water supplied is qualified,so the expected goal is achieved.However,duties of each department are not explicit and the communication is inadequate,so collaboration should be reinforced.