现代农业科技
現代農業科技
현대농업과기
XIANDAIHUA NONGYE
2011年
17期
54-56,59
,共4页
孙丽娜%傅兆麟%汪桐%刘计允
孫麗娜%傅兆麟%汪桐%劉計允
손려나%부조린%왕동%류계윤
伴生栽培小麦%抗倒指数%茎秆特性
伴生栽培小麥%抗倒指數%莖稈特性
반생재배소맥%항도지수%경간특성
auxiliary tritieum aestivum%lodging resistance index%culm characteristics
为探讨伴生栽培小麦倒伏原因,以10个伴生栽培小麦基因型与10个普通栽培小麦基因型为试验材料.采用2种种植密度进行试验研究。结果表明:2个密度处理的10个伴生栽培小麦基因型倒伏率为100.0%,平均倒伏程度为54.1%,比10个普通栽培小麦基因型平均高90.0、51.3仓百分点,差异极显著。伴生栽培小麦与普通栽培小麦相比,抗倒指数低O.0156,达到极显著差异水平;基部第一、二节节间长度也比普通栽培小麦分别多1.9、5.8cm,均达到极显著差异水平;基部第一、二节节间粗度分别少0.84、0.73mm,也均达到极显著差异水平,因而导致伴生栽培小麦抗倒能力显著差。
為探討伴生栽培小麥倒伏原因,以10箇伴生栽培小麥基因型與10箇普通栽培小麥基因型為試驗材料.採用2種種植密度進行試驗研究。結果錶明:2箇密度處理的10箇伴生栽培小麥基因型倒伏率為100.0%,平均倒伏程度為54.1%,比10箇普通栽培小麥基因型平均高90.0、51.3倉百分點,差異極顯著。伴生栽培小麥與普通栽培小麥相比,抗倒指數低O.0156,達到極顯著差異水平;基部第一、二節節間長度也比普通栽培小麥分彆多1.9、5.8cm,均達到極顯著差異水平;基部第一、二節節間粗度分彆少0.84、0.73mm,也均達到極顯著差異水平,因而導緻伴生栽培小麥抗倒能力顯著差。
위탐토반생재배소맥도복원인,이10개반생재배소맥기인형여10개보통재배소맥기인형위시험재료.채용2충충식밀도진행시험연구。결과표명:2개밀도처리적10개반생재배소맥기인형도복솔위100.0%,평균도복정도위54.1%,비10개보통재배소맥기인형평균고90.0、51.3창백분점,차이겁현저。반생재배소맥여보통재배소맥상비,항도지수저O.0156,체도겁현저차이수평;기부제일、이절절간장도야비보통재배소맥분별다1.9、5.8cm,균체도겁현저차이수평;기부제일、이절절간조도분별소0.84、0.73mm,야균체도겁현저차이수평,인이도치반생재배소맥항도능력현저차。
In this paper, to investigate the factors of auxiliary tritieum aestivum lodging, ten auxiliary triticum aestivum genotype and ten ordinary triticum aestivum genotype were studied with two kinds of plant density.The results showed that, the lodging rate of the ten auxiliary tritieum aestivum genotype dealt with two kinds of plant density was 100.0%, the average lodging level was 54.1%,it was 90.0 and 51.3 percentage points higher than the ten ordinary tritieum aestivum genotype,the difference was significant.Compared with the ordinary triticum aestivum,lodging resistance index of the auxiliary triticum aestivum was 0.015 6 lower, it reached a significant level of difference.The length between the first and the second node of the basis section was respectively 1.9 cm and 5.8 cm more than the ordinary tritieum aestivum,whieh all had reached a significant level of difference.The roughness between the first ant] the second node of the basis section was respectively 0.84 mm and 0.73 mm less than it ,which all had reached a significant level of difference,leading to poor lodging ability of auxiliary tritieum aestivum.