中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2009年
3期
477-478
,共2页
痛经%心理疗法
痛經%心理療法
통경%심리요법
Dysmenorrhea%Psychotherapy
目的 观察心理干预辅助治疗痛经的临床效果.方法 将60例痛经的患者随机分为干预组和对照组各30例,对照组采取对症治疗、常规护理;干预组在对照组基础上对患者进行认知调节、情绪调节、行为调节等心理干预.结果 对照组疼痛程度平均Ⅱ-Ⅲ级,干预组疼痛程度平均Ⅰ-Ⅱ级,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);对照组疼痛持续时间平均10.6 h,干预组疼痛持续时间平均7.5 h,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);对照组平均卧床休息时间5.85 h,干预组卧床休息时间3.25 h,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论 心理干预辅助治疗痛经能有效改善患者疼痛症状.
目的 觀察心理榦預輔助治療痛經的臨床效果.方法 將60例痛經的患者隨機分為榦預組和對照組各30例,對照組採取對癥治療、常規護理;榦預組在對照組基礎上對患者進行認知調節、情緒調節、行為調節等心理榦預.結果 對照組疼痛程度平均Ⅱ-Ⅲ級,榦預組疼痛程度平均Ⅰ-Ⅱ級,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(P＜0.01);對照組疼痛持續時間平均10.6 h,榦預組疼痛持續時間平均7.5 h,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(P＜0.01);對照組平均臥床休息時間5.85 h,榦預組臥床休息時間3.25 h,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(P＜0.01).結論 心理榦預輔助治療痛經能有效改善患者疼痛癥狀.
목적 관찰심리간예보조치료통경적림상효과.방법 장60례통경적환자수궤분위간예조화대조조각30례,대조조채취대증치료、상규호리;간예조재대조조기출상대환자진행인지조절、정서조절、행위조절등심리간예.결과 대조조동통정도평균Ⅱ-Ⅲ급,간예조동통정도평균Ⅰ-Ⅱ급,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01);대조조동통지속시간평균10.6 h,간예조동통지속시간평균7.5 h,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01);대조조평균와상휴식시간5.85 h,간예조와상휴식시간3.25 h,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01).결론 심리간예보조치료통경능유효개선환자동통증상.
Objective To study the effect on aiding treatment of patients with dysmenorrhea through psychological intervention.Methods Sixty patients with dysmenorrhea were randomly divied into the intervention group and the control group with 30 cases in each group.The contrd group were treated with allopathy and normal care.On the base of such ineasures,the intervention group were treated with psychological interventions like congnitive regulation,emotion regulation and behavioral regulation.Results The average pain degree of the control group was Ⅱ-Ⅲ.The average pain degree ofthe intervene group Was Ⅰ-Ⅱ.The results ofthe two groups were eonpred.P＜0.01 and the difference was significant.The average dose of Atuopin in the control group was 0.60mg.and the average dose of Atuopin in the intervention group was 0.43 mg.P＜0.01 and the difference of the two groups is obvious.The average time being in bed in the control group was 5.85 hours,and the average time beingin bed in the intervene group was 3.2.5 hours.The results of the two groups were compared,P＜0.01and the difference is significant.Conclusion The intervention can apparently improve patients' symptoms of pain.
