中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2011年
34期
8-10
,共3页
刘芳%方少梅%邱丽文%王秀文
劉芳%方少梅%邱麗文%王秀文
류방%방소매%구려문%왕수문
肿瘤化疗%深静脉置管%护理成本
腫瘤化療%深靜脈置管%護理成本
종류화료%심정맥치관%호리성본
Tumor chemotherapy%Deep vein catheterization%Nursing cost
目的 对PICC及颈内静脉置管的实际护理成本与现行收费标准进行对比,证实实际护理成本与现行收费之间的偏差,在此基础上对比两者在肿瘤患者化疗中的利弊.方法 用项目成本阶梯分摊法,对接受PICC及颈内静脉置管患者实际投入的人力、财力、物力进行测量、归集、统计,核算出的实际护理成本并与其现行的收费标准进行对比;分析其成本及临床应用价值.结果 PICC实际成本(2259.99±30.99)元与现行收费标准1532.79元差价为-727.20元,颈内静脉置管实际成本(393.86±33.93)元与现行收费标准292.13元差价为-101.73元;PICC后并发症发生率为12%,颈内静脉置管为17%.HCC及颈内静脉置管实际专项护理成本大于现行收费价格,PICC的单次护理成本是颈内静脉置管的5.74倍,以一年4~6个化疗疗程计算,PICC护理成本与颈内静脉置管总成本(1年内)比较无显著差异,并发症发生率比较无显著差异.结论 临床应用PICC的优点多于颈内静脉置管,应优选PICC,次选颈内静脉置管.
目的 對PICC及頸內靜脈置管的實際護理成本與現行收費標準進行對比,證實實際護理成本與現行收費之間的偏差,在此基礎上對比兩者在腫瘤患者化療中的利弊.方法 用項目成本階梯分攤法,對接受PICC及頸內靜脈置管患者實際投入的人力、財力、物力進行測量、歸集、統計,覈算齣的實際護理成本併與其現行的收費標準進行對比;分析其成本及臨床應用價值.結果 PICC實際成本(2259.99±30.99)元與現行收費標準1532.79元差價為-727.20元,頸內靜脈置管實際成本(393.86±33.93)元與現行收費標準292.13元差價為-101.73元;PICC後併髮癥髮生率為12%,頸內靜脈置管為17%.HCC及頸內靜脈置管實際專項護理成本大于現行收費價格,PICC的單次護理成本是頸內靜脈置管的5.74倍,以一年4~6箇化療療程計算,PICC護理成本與頸內靜脈置管總成本(1年內)比較無顯著差異,併髮癥髮生率比較無顯著差異.結論 臨床應用PICC的優點多于頸內靜脈置管,應優選PICC,次選頸內靜脈置管.
목적 대PICC급경내정맥치관적실제호리성본여현행수비표준진행대비,증실실제호리성본여현행수비지간적편차,재차기출상대비량자재종류환자화료중적리폐.방법 용항목성본계제분탄법,대접수PICC급경내정맥치관환자실제투입적인력、재력、물력진행측량、귀집、통계,핵산출적실제호리성본병여기현행적수비표준진행대비;분석기성본급림상응용개치.결과 PICC실제성본(2259.99±30.99)원여현행수비표준1532.79원차개위-727.20원,경내정맥치관실제성본(393.86±33.93)원여현행수비표준292.13원차개위-101.73원;PICC후병발증발생솔위12%,경내정맥치관위17%.HCC급경내정맥치관실제전항호리성본대우현행수비개격,PICC적단차호리성본시경내정맥치관적5.74배,이일년4~6개화료료정계산,PICC호리성본여경내정맥치관총성본(1년내)비교무현저차이,병발증발생솔비교무현저차이.결론 림상응용PICC적우점다우경내정맥치관,응우선PICC,차선경내정맥치관.
Objective To confirm the deviation between the present charge and real cost of nursing by comparing them between PICC and jugular veins catheter,and the advantages and disadvantages were weighed between them in tumor patients undergoing chemotherapy.Methods The cost of manpower,financial resources or materials for 106 patients with PICC,68 patients with jugular veins catheter were measured,accounted and statistically analyzed with the ladder sharing method for project cost.Comparing the cost between calculation cost and current charging standard,and the cost and clinical application was studied.Results The real cost of PICC was (2259.99±30.99)Yuan and current charging standard was 1532.79 Yuan,the deviation was -727.20 Yuan,and the real cost of jugular veins catheter was (393.86±33.93) Yuan,and current charging standard was 292.13 Yuan,the deviation was -101.73 Yuan.The complication rate was 12% in PICC,17% in jugular veins catheter.The real cost of nursing on PICC and jugular veins catheter was higher than current charging standard,and the real cost of single nursing on PICC was 5.74 times higher than jugular veins catheter.The cost remains unchanged with 4~6 course of chemotherapy treatments in a year.Conclusions The advantages of PICC are more than jugular veins catheter,so the preferred choice is PICC,and jugular veins catheter comes secondary.