中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2012年
11期
1247-1249
,共3页
消毒%宫腔吸引管%保湿%效果
消毒%宮腔吸引管%保濕%效果
소독%궁강흡인관%보습%효과
Disinfection%Uterine suction tube%Moisture%Effect
目的 比较不同的保湿处理对宫腔吸引管清洗效果的影响.方法 选取使用后的宫腔吸引管240件随机分为多酶清洗液组和碱性清洗液组各120件,分别采用多酶清洗液和碱性清洗液保湿处理,用隐血试验法检测保湿4.10,24 h宫腔吸引管的清洗效果并比较两组结果.结果 两组使用4h保湿清洗目测合格率均为100％,隐血试验检测结果,两组总阳性率及宫腔吸引管各部位阳性率差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；使用10h碱性清洗液组保湿清洗目测合格率为98.3％,优于多酶清洗液组的94.2％,但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).隐血试验检测结果,碱性清洗液组吸引管表面、头端、尾部阳性率分别为5.8％,11.7％,10.8％,均低于多酶清洗液组的15.8％,44.2％,23.3％,差异均有统计学意义(x2分别为6.211,31.493,6.618;P＜0.05)；使用24h碱性清洗液组保湿清洗目测合格率为99.2％,优于多酶清洗液组的93.3％,隐血试验检测结果,碱性清洗液组吸引管表面、头端、尾部阳性率分别为5.8％,12.5％,10.8％,均低于多酶清洗液组的16.7％,45.8％,26.7％,差异均有统计学意义(x2分别为50.909,7.053,32.269,8.886;P＜0.01).结论 两种清洗液均是理想的保湿液,碱性清洗液可连续使用24h保湿效果不下降,成本相对较低,是保湿宫腔吸引管的最佳选择.
目的 比較不同的保濕處理對宮腔吸引管清洗效果的影響.方法 選取使用後的宮腔吸引管240件隨機分為多酶清洗液組和堿性清洗液組各120件,分彆採用多酶清洗液和堿性清洗液保濕處理,用隱血試驗法檢測保濕4.10,24 h宮腔吸引管的清洗效果併比較兩組結果.結果 兩組使用4h保濕清洗目測閤格率均為100％,隱血試驗檢測結果,兩組總暘性率及宮腔吸引管各部位暘性率差異均無統計學意義(P＞0.05)；使用10h堿性清洗液組保濕清洗目測閤格率為98.3％,優于多酶清洗液組的94.2％,但差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05).隱血試驗檢測結果,堿性清洗液組吸引管錶麵、頭耑、尾部暘性率分彆為5.8％,11.7％,10.8％,均低于多酶清洗液組的15.8％,44.2％,23.3％,差異均有統計學意義(x2分彆為6.211,31.493,6.618;P＜0.05)；使用24h堿性清洗液組保濕清洗目測閤格率為99.2％,優于多酶清洗液組的93.3％,隱血試驗檢測結果,堿性清洗液組吸引管錶麵、頭耑、尾部暘性率分彆為5.8％,12.5％,10.8％,均低于多酶清洗液組的16.7％,45.8％,26.7％,差異均有統計學意義(x2分彆為50.909,7.053,32.269,8.886;P＜0.01).結論 兩種清洗液均是理想的保濕液,堿性清洗液可連續使用24h保濕效果不下降,成本相對較低,是保濕宮腔吸引管的最佳選擇.
목적 비교불동적보습처리대궁강흡인관청세효과적영향.방법 선취사용후적궁강흡인관240건수궤분위다매청세액조화감성청세액조각120건,분별채용다매청세액화감성청세액보습처리,용은혈시험법검측보습4.10,24 h궁강흡인관적청세효과병비교량조결과.결과 량조사용4h보습청세목측합격솔균위100％,은혈시험검측결과,량조총양성솔급궁강흡인관각부위양성솔차이균무통계학의의(P＞0.05)；사용10h감성청세액조보습청세목측합격솔위98.3％,우우다매청세액조적94.2％,단차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).은혈시험검측결과,감성청세액조흡인관표면、두단、미부양성솔분별위5.8％,11.7％,10.8％,균저우다매청세액조적15.8％,44.2％,23.3％,차이균유통계학의의(x2분별위6.211,31.493,6.618;P＜0.05)；사용24h감성청세액조보습청세목측합격솔위99.2％,우우다매청세액조적93.3％,은혈시험검측결과,감성청세액조흡인관표면、두단、미부양성솔분별위5.8％,12.5％,10.8％,균저우다매청세액조적16.7％,45.8％,26.7％,차이균유통계학의의(x2분별위50.909,7.053,32.269,8.886;P＜0.01).결론 량충청세액균시이상적보습액,감성청세액가련속사용24h보습효과불하강,성본상대교저,시보습궁강흡인관적최가선택.
Objective To explore the effects of different moisturizing methods on the cleaning of uterine suction tube.Methods A total of 240 uterine suctions tubes after used were randomly divided into multi-enzyme group and alkaline group,and two groups were respectively used multi-enzyme cleaning solution and alkaline cleaning liquid to moisturized.Cleaning effect of uterine suction tubes in fourth,tenth and twenty-fourth hour were detected by occult blood test.Results The visual qualified rate of cleaning in two groups after moisturized four hours was 100％ respectively,and there was no difference in total and part positive rate between multienzyme group and alkaline group( P ＞ 0.05 ).After moisturized ten hours,the visual qualified rate of cleaning in alkaline group was 98.3％ significantly better than 94.2％ in multi-enzyme group,the positive rate of suction tube surface,tip,tail was,respectively,5.8％,11.7％,10.8％ in alkaline group significantly lower than 15.8％,44.2％,23.3 ％ in multi-enzyme group( x2 =6.211,31.493,6.618,respectively; P ＜ 0.05 ).Twenty-four hours later,the visual qualified rate of cleaning in alkaline group was 99.2％ significantly better than 93.3％ in multi-enzyme group,the positive rate of suction tube surface,tip,tail was,respectively,5.8％,12.5％,10.8％ in alkaline group significantly lower than 16.7％,45.8％,26.7％ in multi-enzyme group( x2 =50.909,7.053,32.269,8.886,respectively;P＜0.05).Conclusions The two cleaning fluids both are ideal cleaning solution,and alkaline cleaning solution is the best choice for uterine tube cleaning for more than 24 hours moisturizing effects and lower cost.
