CAJ | 학술논문

平行志愿是一种计算机化的高校录取方法，一经推出得到了广泛的好评。但经过对近年来掌握的录取数据的分析和对比，发现平行志愿录取模式也并不是最优的，甚至原来广泛认同的主要优势也并没有得到很好的体现。文章从高招录取率、填报机会、满意度、工作交谈、公平性及“大小年”现象等六个方面对平行志愿录取模式进行了深入剖析，提出独立的平行志愿改革观点。
평행지원시일충계산궤화적고교록취방법，일경추출득도료엄범적호평。단경과대근년래장악적록취수거적분석화대비，발현평행지원록취모식야병불시최우적，심지원래엄범인동적주요우세야병몰유득도흔호적체현。문장종고초록취솔、전보궤회、만의도、공작교담、공평성급“대소년”현상등륙개방면대평행지원록취모식진행료심입부석，제출독립적평행지원개혁관점。
The parallel Preference model is an admission method based on a computerized enrollment process for higher educational institutions. It is highly appreciated and widely adopted by the public. However, the analysis and comparison of related data in recent years revealed that the Parallel Preference model is not perfect. What is worse, it＇s main advantage hasn＇t been demonstrated very well either. This paper raises an independent viewpoint of the innovation of the Parallel Preference model. It reseaches into for the main causes of the problem with an objective attitude and analysis of data from the six aspects of rate of admission, opportunities of application, rate of satisfaction, communication in work, fairness and the rise and fall of university admission index throughout the years.