CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨上田法与Bobath法治疗脑性瘫痪(脑瘫)的疗效。方法将脑瘫患儿64例，随机分为观察组采用上田法治疗，对照组采用Bobath法治疗。治疗前、后进行量化评价。结果两组病人在总的评分无显著性差异，对坐位功能的改善和促进降落伞反应的建立也有显著性差异(t=2.19,χ2=4.08,P<0.05)上田法为73%,Bobath 法为62%。结论两种方法治疗脑瘫均有效，但上田法在坐位功能和阳性支持反应的改善以及促进降落伞反应的建立更占优势。
목적탐토상전법여Bobath법치료뇌성탄탄(뇌탄)적료효。방법장뇌탄환인64례，수궤분위관찰조채용상전법치료，대조조채용Bobath법치료。치료전、후진행양화평개。결과량조병인재총적평분무현저성차이，대좌위공능적개선화촉진강락산반응적건립야유현저성차이(t=2.19,χ2=4.08,P<0.05)상전법위73%,Bobath 법위62%。결론량충방법치료뇌탄균유효，단상전법재좌위공능화양성지지반응적개선이급촉진강락산반응적건립경점우세。
Objective The object of this study was to characterize the theraputic method of Shangtian and Bobath in treating cerebral palsy.Methods Sixty four patients with cerebral palsy,age from ,were subjected to this study.They were divided into two groups.treated with Shangtian method and Bobath method.Quantity evaluation on motion function was performed before and after the treatment.Results The overall score on motion function development was not significantly different between two groups(P >0.05).However,These were significantly different in seating function development and induces protective extensor thrust parachute reaction,between the two groups.Positive suppoting reaction improvement of 73％ in shangtian treated group,62％ in Bobath's treated group. Conclusion Both of the two therapeutic methods are effective in treating cerebral palsy.However.Shangtian is more effectual in improving seating function,postive suppoting reaction and induced protective extensor thrust parachute reaction.