中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)
中國石油大學學報(自然科學版)
중국석유대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM(EDITION OF NATURAL SCIENCE)
2009年
6期
142-147
,共6页
自发渗吸%露头砂岩%水湿岩心%表面活性剂%渗吸采收率
自髮滲吸%露頭砂巖%水濕巖心%錶麵活性劑%滲吸採收率
자발삼흡%로두사암%수습암심%표면활성제%삼흡채수솔
spontaneous imbibition%outcrop sandstone%water-wet cores%surfactant%imbibition recovery efficiency
利用国产露头砂岩岩心,研究水湿条件下盐水、非离子表面活性剂、阴离子表面活性剂和阳离子表面活性剂溶液的自发渗吸规律及其对采收率的影响,对比盐水渗吸、表面活性剂溶液渗吸和先盐水渗吸后表面活性剂溶液的渗吸情况.结果表明:在岩心渗透率范围内,各种溶液渗吸的最终采收率为盐水(0.32~0.50)w_(OOIP)(w_(OOIP)为原始含油量),非离子表面活性剂溶液(0.38~0.50)w_(OOIP),阴离子表面活性剂溶液(0.44~0.55)w_(OOIP),阳离子表面活性剂溶液(0.38~0.44)w_(OOIP);同一类型的非离子表面活性剂在具有特定结构时渗吸效果才达到最好,阴离子表面活性剂的渗吸效果一般好于其他类型表面活性剂;盐水渗吸后再进行表面活性剂渗吸,可提高采收率(0.02~0.04)w_(OOIP).
利用國產露頭砂巖巖心,研究水濕條件下鹽水、非離子錶麵活性劑、陰離子錶麵活性劑和暘離子錶麵活性劑溶液的自髮滲吸規律及其對採收率的影響,對比鹽水滲吸、錶麵活性劑溶液滲吸和先鹽水滲吸後錶麵活性劑溶液的滲吸情況.結果錶明:在巖心滲透率範圍內,各種溶液滲吸的最終採收率為鹽水(0.32~0.50)w_(OOIP)(w_(OOIP)為原始含油量),非離子錶麵活性劑溶液(0.38~0.50)w_(OOIP),陰離子錶麵活性劑溶液(0.44~0.55)w_(OOIP),暘離子錶麵活性劑溶液(0.38~0.44)w_(OOIP);同一類型的非離子錶麵活性劑在具有特定結構時滲吸效果纔達到最好,陰離子錶麵活性劑的滲吸效果一般好于其他類型錶麵活性劑;鹽水滲吸後再進行錶麵活性劑滲吸,可提高採收率(0.02~0.04)w_(OOIP).
이용국산로두사암암심,연구수습조건하염수、비리자표면활성제、음리자표면활성제화양리자표면활성제용액적자발삼흡규률급기대채수솔적영향,대비염수삼흡、표면활성제용액삼흡화선염수삼흡후표면활성제용액적삼흡정황.결과표명:재암심삼투솔범위내,각충용액삼흡적최종채수솔위염수(0.32~0.50)w_(OOIP)(w_(OOIP)위원시함유량),비리자표면활성제용액(0.38~0.50)w_(OOIP),음리자표면활성제용액(0.44~0.55)w_(OOIP),양리자표면활성제용액(0.38~0.44)w_(OOIP);동일류형적비리자표면활성제재구유특정결구시삼흡효과재체도최호,음리자표면활성제적삼흡효과일반호우기타류형표면활성제;염수삼흡후재진행표면활성제삼흡,가제고채수솔(0.02~0.04)w_(OOIP).
Spontaneous imbibition behavior of brine, nonionic surfactant solution, anionic surfactant solution, and cationic surfactant solution and its effects on recovery efficiency were studied in water-wet Chinese outcrop sandstones. The imbibition charateristics were compared in brine, surfactant solution, and sequence of brine and surfactant solution. The results show that the ultimate imbibition recovery efficiency of brine is between 0.32 w_(OOIP) and 0.50 w_(OOIP), where w_(OOIP) refers to the original oil-cut, and that of nonionic surfactants is between 0.38 w_(OOIP) and 0.50 w_(OOIP), and that of anionic surfactants is between 0.44 w_(OOIP) and 0.55 w_(OOIP), and that of cationic surfactants is between 0.38 w_(OOIP) and 0.44 w_(OOIP). The same type of nonionic surfactant with a specific structure could reach the best imbibition results. The imbibition recovery efficiency of anionic surfactant is generally better than that of any other type surfactant. Moreover, if cores are first imbibed in brine and then in surfactant solution, the ultimate recovery efficiency will be improved by (0.02-0.04)w_(OOIP).