山地学报
山地學報
산지학보
JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE
2010年
1期
69-75
,共7页
刘刚%朱剑云%叶永昌%刘颂颂%苏志尧
劉剛%硃劍雲%葉永昌%劉頌頌%囌誌堯
류강%주검운%협영창%류송송%소지요
东莞%凋落物%碳储量%碳密度%空间分布
東莞%凋落物%碳儲量%碳密度%空間分佈
동완%조락물%탄저량%탄밀도%공간분포
forest litter%organic carbon storage%organic carbon density%spatial distribution
基于2 km×2 km的UTM网格对东莞市不同的森林群落类型进行了详细调查,以研究森林凋落物的碳储量及其空间分布.研究结果表明,天然林凋落物碳储量显著高于人工林;不同森林类型的凋落物碳储量之间差异极显著,其碳密度大小依次为:湿地松-阔叶混交林>相思林>马尾松-杉木林>荷木林>桉树林>杉木-阔叶混交林>马尾松-阔叶混交林>荔枝-龙眼林>青皮竹林.针叶林的单位凋落物碳含量最大,占59%,大于阔叶林;相思林和荷木林单位凋落物碳含量仅次于马尾松-杉木针叶林.不同的经营措施对森林凋落物碳储量有显著的影响,经封山育林的林分凋落物碳储量最大.坡位对凋落物碳储量也有显著的影响,随着坡位的降低,森林凋落物现存量和碳密度随之降低.东莞市森林凋落物碳密度为4.25±0.15 t/hm2,凋落物碳储量总量为0.23±0.008 Mt.凋落物的碳储量动态直接关系到土壤碳储库,采取合适的经营措施,减少人为干扰造成的凋落物的流失,最终对于提高本地区森林生态系统碳库会有积极作用.
基于2 km×2 km的UTM網格對東莞市不同的森林群落類型進行瞭詳細調查,以研究森林凋落物的碳儲量及其空間分佈.研究結果錶明,天然林凋落物碳儲量顯著高于人工林;不同森林類型的凋落物碳儲量之間差異極顯著,其碳密度大小依次為:濕地鬆-闊葉混交林>相思林>馬尾鬆-杉木林>荷木林>桉樹林>杉木-闊葉混交林>馬尾鬆-闊葉混交林>荔枝-龍眼林>青皮竹林.針葉林的單位凋落物碳含量最大,佔59%,大于闊葉林;相思林和荷木林單位凋落物碳含量僅次于馬尾鬆-杉木針葉林.不同的經營措施對森林凋落物碳儲量有顯著的影響,經封山育林的林分凋落物碳儲量最大.坡位對凋落物碳儲量也有顯著的影響,隨著坡位的降低,森林凋落物現存量和碳密度隨之降低.東莞市森林凋落物碳密度為4.25±0.15 t/hm2,凋落物碳儲量總量為0.23±0.008 Mt.凋落物的碳儲量動態直接關繫到土壤碳儲庫,採取閤適的經營措施,減少人為榦擾造成的凋落物的流失,最終對于提高本地區森林生態繫統碳庫會有積極作用.
기우2 km×2 km적UTM망격대동완시불동적삼림군락류형진행료상세조사,이연구삼림조락물적탄저량급기공간분포.연구결과표명,천연림조락물탄저량현저고우인공림;불동삼림류형적조락물탄저량지간차이겁현저,기탄밀도대소의차위:습지송-활협혼교림>상사림>마미송-삼목림>하목림>안수림>삼목-활협혼교림>마미송-활협혼교림>려지-용안림>청피죽림.침협림적단위조락물탄함량최대,점59%,대우활협림;상사림화하목림단위조락물탄함량부차우마미송-삼목침협림.불동적경영조시대삼림조락물탄저량유현저적영향,경봉산육림적림분조락물탄저량최대.파위대조락물탄저량야유현저적영향,수착파위적강저,삼림조락물현존량화탄밀도수지강저.동완시삼림조락물탄밀도위4.25±0.15 t/hm2,조락물탄저량총량위0.23±0.008 Mt.조락물적탄저량동태직접관계도토양탄저고,채취합괄적경영조시,감소인위간우조성적조락물적류실,최종대우제고본지구삼림생태계통탄고회유적겁작용.
In this study, forest litter organic carbon storage and density among forest communities were estimated based on a forest survey in Dongguan, south China. Filed sampling was carried out based on a 2 km×2 km grid system overlaid on the topographic map of the forest land in Dongguan. The results showed that the litter of natural forests contained significantly more organic carbon than that of artificial forests, which was assessed by One-way ANOVA using STATISTICA 8.0; and the litter organic carbon density among the 10 types of forests classified by their dominant trees were significantly different with each other. The order of the litter carbon density from large to small is: Pinus elliottii & broad leaf forest > Acacia magium > Pinus massoniana and Cunninghamia lanceolata > Schima superba > Eucalyptus exserta > Cunninghamia lanceolata & broad leaf forest> Pinus massoniana and broad leaf forest > Litchi chinensis and Dimocarpus longan > Bambusa textilis. In addition, coniferous forest litter contained 59% of carbon per unit mass, more than that of broadleaved forests. The second largest litter carbon content per unit mass existed in the forests dominated by Acacia magium and Schima superba. Litter organic carbon storage was also influenced by forest management regimes. Closing the mountain for forest rehabilitation led to higher level of litter organic carbon density. There was no significant influence among different slopes and different aspects. However, different positions on slopes were found to have significant influence on the litter organic carbon density. The highest level of litter organic carbon density was found on the ridge of the hill. The total litter organic carbon pool was estimated as 0.23±0.008 Mt, and the average litter organic carbon density was 4.25±0.15 t/hm2. The dynamics of litter organic carbon are closely related to the soil organic carbon pool. Therefore, appropriate measures should be taken to prevent the ecosystem from the decrease of litters by human activities, which will be useful for increasing the carbon pools of the study area.