中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2012年
2期
158-161
,共4页
陈骥%梁繁荣%刘迈兰%陈姣%吴曦
陳驥%樑繁榮%劉邁蘭%陳姣%吳晞
진기%량번영%류매란%진교%오희
基于问题的学习%中医%Meta分析%系统评价
基于問題的學習%中醫%Meta分析%繫統評價
기우문제적학습%중의%Meta분석%계통평개
Problem-based learning%Traditional Chinese medicine%Meta-analysis%Systematic review
目的 系统评价“基于问题的学习”( Problem-based learning,PBL)对国内中医类学生学习效果的影响.方法 通过检索CBM、CNKI、VIP文献数据库,纳入PBL与LBL教学模式下中医类学生学习效果的对照研究,采用Revman 5.1对数据进行分析.结果 纳入9篇文献,研究方法、质量均较低.两种模式下,学生理论考试成绩的差异无统计学意义[SMD=3.76,95% CI(-0.62,8.15)];而实践操作成绩的差异具统计学意义,PBL组优于LBL组[SMD=7.62,95%CI(3.92,11.32)];在学习能力自评上,两组间差异有统计学意义,PBL组优于LBL组[OR=3.69,95% CI( 1.88,7.21)].结论 PBL教学有助于提高学生主观能动性,提高学生实践能力,适用于中医临床专业课及其拓展型课程的教学;但各纳入研究的质量等级较低,有必要在教学中开展设计严谨的随机对照试验,提供高质量的证据,增加论证强度.
目的 繫統評價“基于問題的學習”( Problem-based learning,PBL)對國內中醫類學生學習效果的影響.方法 通過檢索CBM、CNKI、VIP文獻數據庫,納入PBL與LBL教學模式下中醫類學生學習效果的對照研究,採用Revman 5.1對數據進行分析.結果 納入9篇文獻,研究方法、質量均較低.兩種模式下,學生理論攷試成績的差異無統計學意義[SMD=3.76,95% CI(-0.62,8.15)];而實踐操作成績的差異具統計學意義,PBL組優于LBL組[SMD=7.62,95%CI(3.92,11.32)];在學習能力自評上,兩組間差異有統計學意義,PBL組優于LBL組[OR=3.69,95% CI( 1.88,7.21)].結論 PBL教學有助于提高學生主觀能動性,提高學生實踐能力,適用于中醫臨床專業課及其拓展型課程的教學;但各納入研究的質量等級較低,有必要在教學中開展設計嚴謹的隨機對照試驗,提供高質量的證據,增加論證彊度.
목적 계통평개“기우문제적학습”( Problem-based learning,PBL)대국내중의류학생학습효과적영향.방법 통과검색CBM、CNKI、VIP문헌수거고,납입PBL여LBL교학모식하중의류학생학습효과적대조연구,채용Revman 5.1대수거진행분석.결과 납입9편문헌,연구방법、질량균교저.량충모식하,학생이론고시성적적차이무통계학의의[SMD=3.76,95% CI(-0.62,8.15)];이실천조작성적적차이구통계학의의,PBL조우우LBL조[SMD=7.62,95%CI(3.92,11.32)];재학습능력자평상,량조간차이유통계학의의,PBL조우우LBL조[OR=3.69,95% CI( 1.88,7.21)].결론 PBL교학유조우제고학생주관능동성,제고학생실천능력,괄용우중의림상전업과급기탁전형과정적교학;단각납입연구적질량등급교저,유필요재교학중개전설계엄근적수궤대조시험,제공고질량적증거,증가론증강도.
Objective To assess the influence of PBL formation study effectiveness of TCM students.Methods The controlled studies with the teaching format of both PBL and LBL were included to assess the effectiveness of learning,by searching CBM,CNKI and VIP database.All data was analyzed on Revman 5.1.Results 9 articles were included ; All were low in the quality of their methodology,and the theoretical scores of students in PBL or LBL format shows no statistical difference [SMD=3.76,95% CI ( -0.62,8.15 ) ].PBL format was superior to LBL on students' practical scores [SMD=7.62,95% CI ( 3.92,11.32 ) ]; Compared to LBL format,PBL proved to have a better influence on students' self-assessment for learning ability[OR=3.69,95% CI( 1.88,7.21 )].Conclusion PBL helps to enhance the activeness of students,to improve their practical ability,which is valuable if applied in clinical concerned courses.But the included studies were low in quality; more rigorously randomized controlled teaching trials are expected to verify the conclusion.