中华肝胆外科杂志
中華肝膽外科雜誌
중화간담외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY
2011年
4期
328-330
,共3页
陆培华%纪律%蔡兵%蒋志阳%孙键%刘子君%时开网
陸培華%紀律%蔡兵%蔣誌暘%孫鍵%劉子君%時開網
륙배화%기률%채병%장지양%손건%류자군%시개망
卵巢癌%孤立性脾转移%循证治疗
卵巢癌%孤立性脾轉移%循證治療
란소암%고립성비전이%순증치료
Ovarian carcinoma%Solitary splenic metastasis%Evidence-based treatment
目的 借助循证医学的方法为一例临床罕见卵巢癌术后脾转移患者确定治疗目标和方案.方法 充分评估患者情况,提出临床问题,从Cochrane Library、CNKI、万方数据库、PubMed、Embase和ScienceDirect数据库检索相关证据,检索时间截至2009年10月.对所获证据进行评价,并结合医生经验及患者愿望制定治疗方案.结果 共检索出英文文献15篇,中文文献11篇.Cochrane数据库内尚无卵巢癌术后脾转移治疗方面的RCT,PubMed、Embase和ScienceDirect数据库含5篇综述类文章,CNKI和万方数据库含回顾性队列研究1篇,其余均为个例报道.综合分析检索结果,为患者制订相对合理方案,经20个月随访,该方案适合.结论 本例属罕见病例,虽然循证证据强度偏低,不能充分体现循证治疗的价值,但最终治疗结果 满意.本研究可为此类缺乏大型RCT的罕见病例运用循证思维诊治提供参考.
目的 藉助循證醫學的方法為一例臨床罕見卵巢癌術後脾轉移患者確定治療目標和方案.方法 充分評估患者情況,提齣臨床問題,從Cochrane Library、CNKI、萬方數據庫、PubMed、Embase和ScienceDirect數據庫檢索相關證據,檢索時間截至2009年10月.對所穫證據進行評價,併結閤醫生經驗及患者願望製定治療方案.結果 共檢索齣英文文獻15篇,中文文獻11篇.Cochrane數據庫內尚無卵巢癌術後脾轉移治療方麵的RCT,PubMed、Embase和ScienceDirect數據庫含5篇綜述類文章,CNKI和萬方數據庫含迴顧性隊列研究1篇,其餘均為箇例報道.綜閤分析檢索結果,為患者製訂相對閤理方案,經20箇月隨訪,該方案適閤.結論 本例屬罕見病例,雖然循證證據彊度偏低,不能充分體現循證治療的價值,但最終治療結果 滿意.本研究可為此類缺乏大型RCT的罕見病例運用循證思維診治提供參攷.
목적 차조순증의학적방법위일례림상한견란소암술후비전이환자학정치료목표화방안.방법 충분평고환자정황,제출림상문제,종Cochrane Library、CNKI、만방수거고、PubMed、Embase화ScienceDirect수거고검색상관증거,검색시간절지2009년10월.대소획증거진행평개,병결합의생경험급환자원망제정치료방안.결과 공검색출영문문헌15편,중문문헌11편.Cochrane수거고내상무란소암술후비전이치료방면적RCT,PubMed、Embase화ScienceDirect수거고함5편종술류문장,CNKI화만방수거고함회고성대렬연구1편,기여균위개례보도.종합분석검색결과,위환자제정상대합리방안,경20개월수방,해방안괄합.결론 본례속한견병례,수연순증증거강도편저,불능충분체현순증치료적개치,단최종치료결과 만의.본연구가위차류결핍대형RCT적한견병례운용순증사유진치제공삼고.
Objective Evidence-based medicine was used to make an individualized treatment plan for rare solitary splenic metastasis of an ovarian carcinoma in a female patient. Methods After clinical problems were discovered, evidence was collected from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, CNKI and Wanfang databases according to our predefined search strategy. The search was done until October, 2009. The validity of the evidence was assessed. The evidence, combined with the doctor experience and the patient value, was applied to the patient. Results A total of 15 English literature and 11 Chinese literature were identified. A rational treatment plan was made upon a critical evaluation of the data. There were 5 review articles in PubMed, EMBASE and ScienceDirect databases and no RCT in the Cochrane Library. And there was one retrospective cohort study inCNKI and Wanfang databases. The others were all case reports. After 20 month follow-up, the treatment protocol was proven correct. Conclusion The patient has rare disease, and the evidence intension for the evidence-based medicine was low. It can not present the efficacy of the evidence-based medicine treatment sufficiently, though it could provide some suggestion for rare disease which was lack of large RCT for evidence-based Methods .