中华放射医学与防护杂志
中華放射醫學與防護雜誌
중화방사의학여방호잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2008年
5期
495-498,529
,共5页
孙建湘%孙伟建%隋建丽%周平坤
孫建湘%孫偉建%隋建麗%週平坤
손건상%손위건%수건려%주평곤
辐射敏感性%DNA双链断裂%DNA修复%癌细胞
輻射敏感性%DNA雙鏈斷裂%DNA脩複%癌細胞
복사민감성%DNA쌍련단렬%DNA수복%암세포
Radiosensitivity%DNA double-strand break%DNA repair%Cancer cells
目的 了解不同组织来源癌细胞株和人体肿瘤组织原代细胞的DNA双链断裂损伤修复的个体差异性,探寻预测癌细胞辐射敏感性的生物指标.方法 60Coγ射线照射诱发DNA损伤,脉冲电场凝胶电泳检测DNA双链断裂损伤修复,细胞克隆形成能力法检测细胞辐射敏感性.结果 8个不同组织来源癌细胞株的辐射敏感性有较大的差异(D0为0.65~2.15 Gy),不同细胞株20 Gyγ射线照射诱发产生的DNA双链断裂原初损伤有一定的差别,但与细胞辐射抗性无相关性.辐射敏感细胞SX-10的DNA双链断裂修复缺陷发生在早期快速修复相,而A2780细胞的修复缺陷是发生在晚期慢速修复相.20 Gy照射修复2 h后DNA双链断裂残留量与细胞辐射敏感性指标D0或SF2值有显著的相关性.不同个体患者脑肿瘤组织原代细胞之间,辐射诱发DNA双链断裂的修复反应存在明显差异,修复2 h后残留损伤的个体差异性分布类似于癌细胞株.结论 DNA双链断裂残留损伤与癌细胞辐射抗性有显著相关性,可作生物指标预测肿瘤组织细胞对放射治疗的反应性.
目的 瞭解不同組織來源癌細胞株和人體腫瘤組織原代細胞的DNA雙鏈斷裂損傷脩複的箇體差異性,探尋預測癌細胞輻射敏感性的生物指標.方法 60Coγ射線照射誘髮DNA損傷,脈遲電場凝膠電泳檢測DNA雙鏈斷裂損傷脩複,細胞剋隆形成能力法檢測細胞輻射敏感性.結果 8箇不同組織來源癌細胞株的輻射敏感性有較大的差異(D0為0.65~2.15 Gy),不同細胞株20 Gyγ射線照射誘髮產生的DNA雙鏈斷裂原初損傷有一定的差彆,但與細胞輻射抗性無相關性.輻射敏感細胞SX-10的DNA雙鏈斷裂脩複缺陷髮生在早期快速脩複相,而A2780細胞的脩複缺陷是髮生在晚期慢速脩複相.20 Gy照射脩複2 h後DNA雙鏈斷裂殘留量與細胞輻射敏感性指標D0或SF2值有顯著的相關性.不同箇體患者腦腫瘤組織原代細胞之間,輻射誘髮DNA雙鏈斷裂的脩複反應存在明顯差異,脩複2 h後殘留損傷的箇體差異性分佈類似于癌細胞株.結論 DNA雙鏈斷裂殘留損傷與癌細胞輻射抗性有顯著相關性,可作生物指標預測腫瘤組織細胞對放射治療的反應性.
목적 료해불동조직래원암세포주화인체종류조직원대세포적DNA쌍련단렬손상수복적개체차이성,탐심예측암세포복사민감성적생물지표.방법 60Coγ사선조사유발DNA손상,맥충전장응효전영검측DNA쌍련단렬손상수복,세포극륭형성능역법검측세포복사민감성.결과 8개불동조직래원암세포주적복사민감성유교대적차이(D0위0.65~2.15 Gy),불동세포주20 Gyγ사선조사유발산생적DNA쌍련단렬원초손상유일정적차별,단여세포복사항성무상관성.복사민감세포SX-10적DNA쌍련단렬수복결함발생재조기쾌속수복상,이A2780세포적수복결함시발생재만기만속수복상.20 Gy조사수복2 h후DNA쌍련단렬잔류량여세포복사민감성지표D0혹SF2치유현저적상관성.불동개체환자뇌종류조직원대세포지간,복사유발DNA쌍련단렬적수복반응존재명현차이,수복2 h후잔류손상적개체차이성분포유사우암세포주.결론 DNA쌍련단렬잔류손상여암세포복사항성유현저상관성,가작생물지표예측종류조직세포대방사치료적반응성.
Objective To understand the variation of the DNA double-strand break rejoining capacity among different cultured cancer cell lines and the primary cancer cells from brain cancer patients,and to explore the predictor of radiotherapy responses of cancers. Methods DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were induced by 60Co γ-irradiation. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to analyze the initial production and rejoining of DNA DSBs. Radiosensitivity was determined by in vitro assay of clonogenic-forming capacity. Results A wide variation of radiosensitivity, e.g. The survival parameter of D0 varied from 0.65 to 2.15 Gy, was displayed among the eight cell lines derived from different type of cancers. Although differential level of initial DNA DSBs induced by 20 Gy γ-rays was observed among various cell lines, it was not correlated with the radiosensitivity. The deficiency of DNA DSB rejoining in radiosensitive cell lines was shown either in the early rapid-rejoining phase (SX-10 cells) or in the late slow-rejoining phase (A2780 cells). A significant relationship was observed between the residual level of DNA DSBs measured at 2 h post-20 Gy irradiation and the cellular radioseusitivity (D0 or SF2). The kinetic curves of rejoining DNA DSBs in the primary human brain tumor cells indicated a variation on DSB rejoining capacity among different individual tumor. The residual level of DNA DSBs after 2 h of rejoining post 20 Gy irradiation in primary human brain tumor cells is compatible to the results obtained in vitro culture cancer cell lines. Conclusions The residual level of DNA DSBs is correlated with radioresistance of cancer cells, and the residual DNA damage is a useful parameter in predicting the response of tumor tissue to radiotherapy.