中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志
中華耳鼻嚥喉頭頸外科雜誌
중화이비인후두경외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
2011年
10期
836-838
,共3页
彭歆%毛驰%王洋%郭传瑸%俞光岩%黄敏娴%张雷%张益
彭歆%毛馳%王洋%郭傳瑸%俞光巖%黃敏嫻%張雷%張益
팽흠%모치%왕양%곽전빈%유광암%황민한%장뢰%장익
口腔肿瘤%外科皮瓣%修复外科手术
口腔腫瘤%外科皮瓣%脩複外科手術
구강종류%외과피판%수복외과수술
Mouth neoplasms%Surgical flaps%Reconstructive surgical procedures
目的 比较上臂外侧皮瓣和前臂皮瓣修复口腔癌术后组织缺损的临床应用效果.方法 对北京大学口腔医院口腔颌面外科2007-2009年收治的21例采用上臂外侧皮瓣和104例采用前臂皮瓣行口腔癌术后缺损修复的患者进行对比研究,比较两种皮瓣的手术制备时间、皮瓣移植成功率、供区并发症及术后口腔功能恢复情况.结果 上臂外侧皮瓣和前臂皮瓣制备的平均手术时间((x)±s)为(46.4±7.6)min和(41.5±7.5) min,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).上臂外侧皮瓣和前臂皮瓣的移植成功率分别为90.5%( 19/21)和95.2% (99/104),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).上臂外侧皮瓣供区可直接拉拢缝合,2例患者术后出现桡神经损伤症状;前臂皮瓣患者无供区并发症发生,但供区需行全厚皮片移植,于经常外露的前臂区域遗留手术瘢痕.两种皮瓣患者术后均能经口腔进软食或普通饮食,无发音不清.结论 上臂外侧皮瓣供区隐蔽,无需植皮,移植成功率高,可作为前臂皮瓣的补充,进一步丰富了口腔癌组织缺损的修复手段.
目的 比較上臂外側皮瓣和前臂皮瓣脩複口腔癌術後組織缺損的臨床應用效果.方法 對北京大學口腔醫院口腔頜麵外科2007-2009年收治的21例採用上臂外側皮瓣和104例採用前臂皮瓣行口腔癌術後缺損脩複的患者進行對比研究,比較兩種皮瓣的手術製備時間、皮瓣移植成功率、供區併髮癥及術後口腔功能恢複情況.結果 上臂外側皮瓣和前臂皮瓣製備的平均手術時間((x)±s)為(46.4±7.6)min和(41.5±7.5) min,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).上臂外側皮瓣和前臂皮瓣的移植成功率分彆為90.5%( 19/21)和95.2% (99/104),差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).上臂外側皮瓣供區可直接拉攏縫閤,2例患者術後齣現橈神經損傷癥狀;前臂皮瓣患者無供區併髮癥髮生,但供區需行全厚皮片移植,于經常外露的前臂區域遺留手術瘢痕.兩種皮瓣患者術後均能經口腔進軟食或普通飲食,無髮音不清.結論 上臂外側皮瓣供區隱蔽,無需植皮,移植成功率高,可作為前臂皮瓣的補充,進一步豐富瞭口腔癌組織缺損的脩複手段.
목적 비교상비외측피판화전비피판수복구강암술후조직결손적림상응용효과.방법 대북경대학구강의원구강합면외과2007-2009년수치적21례채용상비외측피판화104례채용전비피판행구강암술후결손수복적환자진행대비연구,비교량충피판적수술제비시간、피판이식성공솔、공구병발증급술후구강공능회복정황.결과 상비외측피판화전비피판제비적평균수술시간((x)±s)위(46.4±7.6)min화(41.5±7.5) min,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).상비외측피판화전비피판적이식성공솔분별위90.5%( 19/21)화95.2% (99/104),차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).상비외측피판공구가직접랍롱봉합,2례환자술후출현뇨신경손상증상;전비피판환자무공구병발증발생,단공구수행전후피편이식,우경상외로적전비구역유류수술반흔.량충피판환자술후균능경구강진연식혹보통음식,무발음불청.결론 상비외측피판공구은폐,무수식피,이식성공솔고,가작위전비피판적보충,진일보봉부료구강암조직결손적수복수단.
Objective To compare the clinical application of lateral arm flap and radial forearm flap in reconstruction after oral cancer ablation.Methods The clinical data of 21 cases with lateral ann flap and 104 cases with radial forearm flap between 2007 and 2009 were reviewed.The flap harvest time,flap survival rate,donor site morbidity and postoperative oral function were compared and analyzed.Results The average flap harvest time of lateral ann flap and radial forearm flap were (46.4 ± 7.6 ) min and (41.5 ±7.5) min ((x) ±s) respectively.The flap survival rates of the two flaps were 90.5% ( 19/21 ) and 95.2% (99/104) respectively.There was no significant difference between the two flaps in the average flap harvest time and survival rate (P > 0.05 ).The donor site of lateral arm flap could be primarily closed and radial nerve injury occurred in 2 patients.Skin graft was necessary for the donor site closure of radial forearm flap and conspicuous unattractive scar could be seen.All patients could have oral diet and no difficulty in speech intelligibility.Conclusion The lateral arm flap is relatively safe and reliable alterative to the radial forearm flap for the defects reconstruction after oral cancer ablation.