CAJ | 학술논문

目的获取正常成人神经行为认知状态测试(NCSE)量表检测数据,探讨年龄、文化程度、性别等因素对NCSE量表检测结果的影响. 方法对100例18～85岁正常中国成人进行NCSE量表检测,获取总评分及各分项认知能力评分数据,计算各分项认知能力评分的均数、标准差,分析其在年龄、文化程度、性别等不同因素组之间的差异. 结果 100例正常中国成人NCSE量表各分项认知能力评分的均数均在NCSE手册正常值范围内.不同年龄组在理解、复述、记忆和判断分项认知能力评分中比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).不同文化程度组在总评分和定向、理解、复述、记忆、计算、类似性分项认知能力评分中比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),不同性别组在总评分和各分项认知能力评分中比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05). 结论 NCSE量表正常值判断标准适用于中国成人,使用NCSE量表进行检测时,需考虑受试者的年龄和受教育程度的影响.
목적 획취정상성인신경행위인지상태측시(NCSE)량표검측수거,탐토년령、문화정도、성별등인소대NCSE량표검측결과적영향. 방법 대100례18～85세정상중국성인진행NCSE량표검측,획취총평분급각분항인지능력평분수거,계산각분항인지능력평분적균수、표준차,분석기재년령、문화정도、성별등불동인소조지간적차이. 결과 100례정상중국성인NCSE량표각분항인지능력평분적균수균재NCSE수책정상치범위내.불동년령조재리해、복술、기억화판단분항인지능력평분중비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).불동문화정도조재총평분화정향、리해、복술、기억、계산、유사성분항인지능력평분중비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),불동성별조재총평분화각분항인지능력평분중비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05). 결론 NCSE량표정상치판단표준괄용우중국성인,사용NCSE량표진행검측시,수고필수시자적년령화수교육정도적영향.
Objective To obtain the normative data of Nenrobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE) in healthy Chinese adults and assess the effects of age, educational level, and gender on the examination results. Methods A total of 100 normal healthy Chinese adults ranging from 18 to 85 years of age were examined with NCSE to obtain the scores of NCSE and the functional items. Rank sum test was used to analyze the variation of the scores between the different groups blocked by educational level, age, and gender. Results Good agreement was found between the normative data provided by NCSE and the measurements in healthy Chinese adults. Significant differences were noted between the young, middle-aged and old people subjects in the scores of the functional items such as comprehension, repetition, memory and judgment (P<0.05). The average total score of NCSE and scores for some functional items (orientation, comprehension, repetition, memory, calculation and similarities) differed significantly between the groups with different education levels (P<0.05), but the gender did not affect the total or item scores of NCSE (P>0.05). Conclusion The NCSE can be applied in examining healthy Chinese adults using the standards provided by the scale, but the impact of age and education level of the subjects should be considered when interpreting the results.