中华实验外科杂志
中華實驗外科雜誌
중화실험외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY
2012年
6期
1177-1178
,共2页
王云慧%鞠海星%穆林松%周致红
王雲慧%鞠海星%穆林鬆%週緻紅
왕운혜%국해성%목림송%주치홍
直肠肿瘤%术前分期%腔内超声%磁共振成像
直腸腫瘤%術前分期%腔內超聲%磁共振成像
직장종류%술전분기%강내초성%자공진성상
Rectal neoplasms%Preoperative staging%Endoluminal ultrasound%Magnetic resonance imaging
目的 比较核磁共振(MRI)和腔内超声(EUS)对直肠癌术前分期的价值.方法 分别应用MRI和EUS检查对72例和55例直肠癌患者行术前分期,与手术及病理结果对比,比较MRI和EUS对直肠肿瘤浸润深度、区域淋巴结转移判断的准确性.结果 MRI判断T分期总的准确率为76.4％ (55/72),MRI评价N分期的准确率为63.9％ (46/72),EUS判断T分期总的准确率为81.8％(45/55),评价N分期的准确率为65.5％ (36/55).结论 MRI与EUS判断T分期的准确性差异无统计学意义,EUS判断早中期直肠肿瘤浸润层次的准确率高于MRI,两者判断N分期的准确率均较低.
目的 比較覈磁共振(MRI)和腔內超聲(EUS)對直腸癌術前分期的價值.方法 分彆應用MRI和EUS檢查對72例和55例直腸癌患者行術前分期,與手術及病理結果對比,比較MRI和EUS對直腸腫瘤浸潤深度、區域淋巴結轉移判斷的準確性.結果 MRI判斷T分期總的準確率為76.4％ (55/72),MRI評價N分期的準確率為63.9％ (46/72),EUS判斷T分期總的準確率為81.8％(45/55),評價N分期的準確率為65.5％ (36/55).結論 MRI與EUS判斷T分期的準確性差異無統計學意義,EUS判斷早中期直腸腫瘤浸潤層次的準確率高于MRI,兩者判斷N分期的準確率均較低.
목적 비교핵자공진(MRI)화강내초성(EUS)대직장암술전분기적개치.방법 분별응용MRI화EUS검사대72례화55례직장암환자행술전분기,여수술급병리결과대비,비교MRI화EUS대직장종류침윤심도、구역림파결전이판단적준학성.결과 MRI판단T분기총적준학솔위76.4％ (55/72),MRI평개N분기적준학솔위63.9％ (46/72),EUS판단T분기총적준학솔위81.8％(45/55),평개N분기적준학솔위65.5％ (36/55).결론 MRI여EUS판단T분기적준학성차이무통계학의의,EUS판단조중기직장종류침윤층차적준학솔고우MRI,량자판단N분기적준학솔균교저.
Objective To comparative study of endoluminal ultrasonography (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.Methods MRI and EUS was performed prior to surgery in 58 patients with rectal carcinoma to assess its value in staging the tumor.Results The accuracy of MRI for T staging and N staging were 76.4％ and 63.9％.The accuracy of EUS for T staging and N staging were 81.8％ and 65.5％.Conclusion EUS is superior to MRI in judgment for early tumors infiltrate depth.But both have certain limitations in detection of N staging.
