临床麻醉学杂志
臨床痳醉學雜誌
림상마취학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY
2001年
3期
127-129
,共3页
华海音%杨广%刘克玄%陈秉学%黄文起%何广芬%冯霞
華海音%楊廣%劉剋玄%陳秉學%黃文起%何廣芬%馮霞
화해음%양엄%류극현%진병학%황문기%하엄분%풍하
咪唑安定%氯胺酮%基础麻醉%小儿
咪唑安定%氯胺酮%基礎痳醉%小兒
미서안정%록알동%기출마취%소인
目的 研究咪唑安定复合氯胺酮肌注或口服用于小儿基础麻醉的可能性。方法 80例1~8岁、ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级的患儿随机等分成四组:A组,肌注氯胺酮6mg/kg;B组,肌注氯胺酮4mg/kg+口服咪唑安定0.2mg/kg;C组,口服氯胺酮5mg/kg+咪唑安定0.5mg/kg;D组,口服咪唑安定0.7mg/kg。观察各组麻醉诱导效果、循环呼吸变化及不良反应。结果 (1)B组与A组相比,起效更快,术中不良反应发生率更低(P<0.05),而麻醉诱导效果无明显差异(P>0.05);(2)C组与A组相比,小儿更为合作(P<0.01),HR增加不明显(P>0.05),但起效更慢(P<0.05),镇静程度不如后者(P<0.05),但80%的患儿尚能与父母分离。结论 咪唑安定复合氯胺酮肌注用于小儿麻醉诱导要优于单纯肌注氯胺酮,而咪唑安定复合氯胺酮口服仍不失为一种可行的诱导方法。
目的 研究咪唑安定複閤氯胺酮肌註或口服用于小兒基礎痳醉的可能性。方法 80例1~8歲、ASAⅠ~Ⅱ級的患兒隨機等分成四組:A組,肌註氯胺酮6mg/kg;B組,肌註氯胺酮4mg/kg+口服咪唑安定0.2mg/kg;C組,口服氯胺酮5mg/kg+咪唑安定0.5mg/kg;D組,口服咪唑安定0.7mg/kg。觀察各組痳醉誘導效果、循環呼吸變化及不良反應。結果 (1)B組與A組相比,起效更快,術中不良反應髮生率更低(P<0.05),而痳醉誘導效果無明顯差異(P>0.05);(2)C組與A組相比,小兒更為閤作(P<0.01),HR增加不明顯(P>0.05),但起效更慢(P<0.05),鎮靜程度不如後者(P<0.05),但80%的患兒尚能與父母分離。結論 咪唑安定複閤氯胺酮肌註用于小兒痳醉誘導要優于單純肌註氯胺酮,而咪唑安定複閤氯胺酮口服仍不失為一種可行的誘導方法。
목적 연구미서안정복합록알동기주혹구복용우소인기출마취적가능성。방법 80례1~8세、ASAⅠ~Ⅱ급적환인수궤등분성사조:A조,기주록알동6mg/kg;B조,기주록알동4mg/kg+구복미서안정0.2mg/kg;C조,구복록알동5mg/kg+미서안정0.5mg/kg;D조,구복미서안정0.7mg/kg。관찰각조마취유도효과、순배호흡변화급불량반응。결과 (1)B조여A조상비,기효경쾌,술중불량반응발생솔경저(P<0.05),이마취유도효과무명현차이(P>0.05);(2)C조여A조상비,소인경위합작(P<0.01),HR증가불명현(P>0.05),단기효경만(P<0.05),진정정도불여후자(P<0.05),단80%적환인상능여부모분리。결론 미서안정복합록알동기주용우소인마취유도요우우단순기주록알동,이미서안정복합록알동구복잉불실위일충가행적유도방법。
Objective To investigate the possibility of muscular injection ororal administration of midazolam combined with ketamine for the induction in children.Methods 80 children,aged 1 to 8,ASAgrades Ⅰ-Ⅱ,were divided randomly into four groups:group A, ketamine 6mg/kg im,group B,ketamine 4mg/kg +midazolam 0.2mg/kg im, group C,ketamine 5mg/kg +midazolam 0.5mg/kg po,group D,midazolam 0.7mg/kg po. The efficacy of anesthsia induction,hemodynamic and respiratory changes and side effects of the drugs administered were observed.Results (1)Compared to group A,group B experienced faster onset and fewer side effects (P<0.05),while the efficacy of induction had no significant difference (P>0.05).(2)Compared to group A,children in group C could cooperate better with out obvious heart-rate increase (P>0.05),but experienced slower onset and worse induction quality (P<0.05).80% of patients in group C could separate from their parents.Conclusion Intramuscular injection of midazolam combined with ketamine is a better method than ketamine im alone for basic anesthesia in child.Oral administration of midazolam combined with ketamine is still an alternative method.