中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2011年
27期
1909-1913
,共5页
郑浩%施通%施克俭%华平安%陈丽梅%王权光%刘乐%徐旭仲
鄭浩%施通%施剋儉%華平安%陳麗梅%王權光%劉樂%徐旭仲
정호%시통%시극검%화평안%진려매%왕권광%류악%서욱중
麻醉%颈丛%超声检查
痳醉%頸叢%超聲檢查
마취%경총%초성검사
Anesthesia%Cervical plexus%Ultrasonography
目的 测定颈3横突阻滞对膈肌移动度的影响;评估超声引导改良颈从阻滞的安全性和麻醉效果,并与传统一点阻滞法颈丛阻滞比较.方法 第1部分:2007年9月至2008年1月温州医学院附属第一医院择期行甲状腺手术患者30例,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I~H级,采用超声引导双侧颈3横突阻滞和双侧皮神经阻滞,观察膈肌移动度变化.第2部分:2008年1月至2009年2月择期行甲状腺手术的患者80例,ASA I~Ⅱ级.随机分为实验组和对照组,每组40例.实验组采用超声引导改良颈丛阻滞(双侧颈3深丛和双侧颈皮神经阻滞),对照组采用传统一点法颈丛阻滞.局麻药为0.75%罗哌卡因与2%利多卡因等量混合液.观察麻醉效果和副作用.结果 高频超声可以清楚显示颈部重要结构,并可引导穿刺针在横突外侧端注药.颈3横突阻滞后膈肌移动度在15、30 min显著下降,发牛膈肌部分麻痹3例,无膈肌瘫痪发生.实验组和对照组阻滞后血压、心率均较阻滞前显著增高(P<0.05或0.01);对照组在10、20 min的血压增高较实验组显著(P<0.05或0.01),在5、lO、20、30 min的心率增高也较实验组显著(P<0.05或0.01).实验组颈皮支起效时间显著早于对照组(P<0.01),麻醉效果评分显著优于对照组(P<0.01).对照组发生声音嘶哑(12例)显著高于实验组(0例)(P<0.01);发生Horner综合征2例均为对照组;使用降血压降心率药物的患者例数显著高于实验组(P<0.01).结论 超声引导的改良颈丛阻滞对膈肌移动度的影响处于机体代偿范围,比传统一针法颈丛阻滞麻醉效果更好,副作用显著减少,解剖结构容易定位,适合临床应用.
目的 測定頸3橫突阻滯對膈肌移動度的影響;評估超聲引導改良頸從阻滯的安全性和痳醉效果,併與傳統一點阻滯法頸叢阻滯比較.方法 第1部分:2007年9月至2008年1月溫州醫學院附屬第一醫院擇期行甲狀腺手術患者30例,美國痳醉醫師協會(ASA)I~H級,採用超聲引導雙側頸3橫突阻滯和雙側皮神經阻滯,觀察膈肌移動度變化.第2部分:2008年1月至2009年2月擇期行甲狀腺手術的患者80例,ASA I~Ⅱ級.隨機分為實驗組和對照組,每組40例.實驗組採用超聲引導改良頸叢阻滯(雙側頸3深叢和雙側頸皮神經阻滯),對照組採用傳統一點法頸叢阻滯.跼痳藥為0.75%囉哌卡因與2%利多卡因等量混閤液.觀察痳醉效果和副作用.結果 高頻超聲可以清楚顯示頸部重要結構,併可引導穿刺針在橫突外側耑註藥.頸3橫突阻滯後膈肌移動度在15、30 min顯著下降,髮牛膈肌部分痳痺3例,無膈肌癱瘓髮生.實驗組和對照組阻滯後血壓、心率均較阻滯前顯著增高(P<0.05或0.01);對照組在10、20 min的血壓增高較實驗組顯著(P<0.05或0.01),在5、lO、20、30 min的心率增高也較實驗組顯著(P<0.05或0.01).實驗組頸皮支起效時間顯著早于對照組(P<0.01),痳醉效果評分顯著優于對照組(P<0.01).對照組髮生聲音嘶啞(12例)顯著高于實驗組(0例)(P<0.01);髮生Horner綜閤徵2例均為對照組;使用降血壓降心率藥物的患者例數顯著高于實驗組(P<0.01).結論 超聲引導的改良頸叢阻滯對膈肌移動度的影響處于機體代償範圍,比傳統一針法頸叢阻滯痳醉效果更好,副作用顯著減少,解剖結構容易定位,適閤臨床應用.
목적 측정경3횡돌조체대격기이동도적영향;평고초성인도개량경종조체적안전성화마취효과,병여전통일점조체법경총조체비교.방법 제1부분:2007년9월지2008년1월온주의학원부속제일의원택기행갑상선수술환자30례,미국마취의사협회(ASA)I~H급,채용초성인도쌍측경3횡돌조체화쌍측피신경조체,관찰격기이동도변화.제2부분:2008년1월지2009년2월택기행갑상선수술적환자80례,ASA I~Ⅱ급.수궤분위실험조화대조조,매조40례.실험조채용초성인도개량경총조체(쌍측경3심총화쌍측경피신경조체),대조조채용전통일점법경총조체.국마약위0.75%라고잡인여2%리다잡인등량혼합액.관찰마취효과화부작용.결과 고빈초성가이청초현시경부중요결구,병가인도천자침재횡돌외측단주약.경3횡돌조체후격기이동도재15、30 min현저하강,발우격기부분마비3례,무격기탄탄발생.실험조화대조조조체후혈압、심솔균교조체전현저증고(P<0.05혹0.01);대조조재10、20 min적혈압증고교실험조현저(P<0.05혹0.01),재5、lO、20、30 min적심솔증고야교실험조현저(P<0.05혹0.01).실험조경피지기효시간현저조우대조조(P<0.01),마취효과평분현저우우대조조(P<0.01).대조조발생성음시아(12례)현저고우실험조(0례)(P<0.01);발생Horner종합정2례균위대조조;사용강혈압강심솔약물적환자례수현저고우실험조(P<0.01).결론 초성인도적개량경총조체대격기이동도적영향처우궤체대상범위,비전통일침법경총조체마취효과경호,부작용현저감소,해부결구용역정위,괄합림상응용.
Objective To observe the influences upon the degree of diaphragmatic excursion during deep cervical plexus block at the third cervical vertebra(C3)and compare the safety and anesthetic effect of modified cervical plexus block by ultrasonic guidance and blocking of cervical plexus at one point.Methods Part I:30 patients of ASA(American society of anesthesiologists)I-II scheduled for thyroid surgery wero selected for bilateral cervical plexus block at C3 and bilateral skin nerve branches via ultrasonic guidance.Diaphragmatic excursion was recorded.Part II:80 patients of ASA I-II scheduled for thyroid surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups:experimental group(Group U)and control group(Group C).In Group U.modified cervical plexus block was used to fix both sides of C3 and skin nenre branches.The anesthetic mixture with 2% lidocaine and 0.75%ropivacaine was injected.And anesthetic effects and complications were detected.In control group,traditional one-point method for blocking cervical plexus was employed.Results High-frequency Doppler sonography could clearly visualize important neck structures and precisely guide the injection of mixture to the transverse process of C3.Diaphragmatic excursion decreased significantly at 15 and 30 min pest-blocking(P<0.05).And no paralysis of diaphragmatic muscle occurred.Hoverer 3 cases had partial diaphragmatic paralysis.Both blood pressure and heart rate increased significantly post-blocking in both groups(P<0.05 or 0.01).In comparison with Group C,the range of blood pressure Was notably lower at 10 and 20 min in Group U.And heart rate was notably lower at 5,10,20 and 30 min(P<0.05 or 0.01).Furthermore the onset time of skin nerve branches was significantly shorter in Group U(P<0.01).And the anesthetic effect score was better than that in Group C(P<0.01).The incidence of complications,such as hoarseness,was significantly lower in Group U(12 cases in Group C but none in Group U,P<0.01)and Horner's syndrome(2 cases in Group C).The number of cases requiring hypotensor and heart rate control drug was significantly smaller in Group U than that in Group C (P<0.01).Conclusion The improving effect of ultrasound-guided cervical plexus block upon the degree of diaphragmatic movement is within the compensatory range of body.In comparison with the traditional onepoint blocking of cervical plexus,the modified cervical plexus block with ultrasonic guidance offers better anesthetic effects,fewer complications and convenient anesthetic localization.Thus it may be clinically applicable.