中华放射医学与防护杂志
中華放射醫學與防護雜誌
중화방사의학여방호잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2010年
3期
350-353
,共4页
曹国全%许化致%邰云鹏%吴恩福%郑祥武
曹國全%許化緻%邰雲鵬%吳恩福%鄭祥武
조국전%허화치%태운붕%오은복%정상무
数字化摄影%图像质量%曝光剂量%质量控制
數字化攝影%圖像質量%曝光劑量%質量控製
수자화섭영%도상질량%폭광제량%질량공제
Digital radiography%Image quality%Exposure dose%Quality control
目的 比较CR与非晶体硅DR在胸部摄影中入射剂量的差异,探讨两者最优化曝光剂量.方法 应用CR、DR分别别胸部模体行不同入射剂量曝光成像,记录模体表面入射剂量,用CDRAD2.0评估软件计算模体影像图像质量因子反数值IQFinv.CR组、DR组图像IQFinv差异用两独立样本t检验;CR组、DR组各自图像IQFinv与入射剂量的关系应用pearson相关;应用ROC曲线分析获取两组最佳图像IQFinv值,并换算曝光剂量.结果 CR和DR组入射剂量和图像质量IQFinv值之间呈明显的正相关(r=0.893、0.848,P<0.01),并存在线性回归.CR和DR组IQFinv值差异有统计学意义(t=5.455,P<0.05).ROC曲线分析(曲线下面积AUC=0.893,P<0.001),最佳IQFinv值为3.55.结论 CR、DR系统对于低对比度细节的检测能力均随着入射剂量的增加而增加.入射剂量相同时,DR系统对于低对比度细节的检测能力优于CR;在获得相同的图像质量时,与CR相比应用DR可大大降低被榆者辐射剂量.
目的 比較CR與非晶體硅DR在胸部攝影中入射劑量的差異,探討兩者最優化曝光劑量.方法 應用CR、DR分彆彆胸部模體行不同入射劑量曝光成像,記錄模體錶麵入射劑量,用CDRAD2.0評估軟件計算模體影像圖像質量因子反數值IQFinv.CR組、DR組圖像IQFinv差異用兩獨立樣本t檢驗;CR組、DR組各自圖像IQFinv與入射劑量的關繫應用pearson相關;應用ROC麯線分析穫取兩組最佳圖像IQFinv值,併換算曝光劑量.結果 CR和DR組入射劑量和圖像質量IQFinv值之間呈明顯的正相關(r=0.893、0.848,P<0.01),併存在線性迴歸.CR和DR組IQFinv值差異有統計學意義(t=5.455,P<0.05).ROC麯線分析(麯線下麵積AUC=0.893,P<0.001),最佳IQFinv值為3.55.結論 CR、DR繫統對于低對比度細節的檢測能力均隨著入射劑量的增加而增加.入射劑量相同時,DR繫統對于低對比度細節的檢測能力優于CR;在穫得相同的圖像質量時,與CR相比應用DR可大大降低被榆者輻射劑量.
목적 비교CR여비정체규DR재흉부섭영중입사제량적차이,탐토량자최우화폭광제량.방법 응용CR、DR분별별흉부모체행불동입사제량폭광성상,기록모체표면입사제량,용CDRAD2.0평고연건계산모체영상도상질량인자반수치IQFinv.CR조、DR조도상IQFinv차이용량독립양본t검험;CR조、DR조각자도상IQFinv여입사제량적관계응용pearson상관;응용ROC곡선분석획취량조최가도상IQFinv치,병환산폭광제량.결과 CR화DR조입사제량화도상질량IQFinv치지간정명현적정상관(r=0.893、0.848,P<0.01),병존재선성회귀.CR화DR조IQFinv치차이유통계학의의(t=5.455,P<0.05).ROC곡선분석(곡선하면적AUC=0.893,P<0.001),최가IQFinv치위3.55.결론 CR、DR계통대우저대비도세절적검측능력균수착입사제량적증가이증가.입사제량상동시,DR계통대우저대비도세절적검측능력우우CR;재획득상동적도상질량시,여CR상비응용DR가대대강저피유자복사제량.
Objective To compare the difference of entrance dose between CR and amorphous silocon DR system in chest imaging, and to discuss their optimum exposure dose. Methods For CR and DR, different entrance dose was measured by dosimeter in chest phantom. The value of IQFinv was analyzed by CDRAD2. 0 software. Image quality difference between CR and DR was assessed by group t-test. The relationship between image quality and entrance dose was tested by using Pearson correlation analysis. The best IQFinv values in CR and DR system were achieved via ROC curve analysis, and the exposure dose was then calculated. Results There were direct correlation values between entrance dose and the value of IQFinv in CR and DR system, respectively( r =0. 893 ,0. 848 ,P < 0. 01 ) . The linear regression equation for DR was IQFinv =0. 0050 +3. 359, and for CR was IQFinv =0. 005D + I. 651 , where D was entrance dose. The difference of IQFinv value between CR and DR was significant(t = 5. 455 ,P < 0. 05). The best IQFinv value of the two groups from ROC analysis was 3.55. Conclusions With the entrance dose increased, the detection ability of contrast-detail was elevated in the two digital radiography systems. With equal entrance dose, the detection ability of DR in contrast-detail was superior to CR. With equal image quality, DR obviously decreased the radiation dose to the patients.