CAJ | 학술논문

目的对经桡动脉和股动脉途径行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗(PCI)患者的临床资料进行对比分析.方法选择行PCI的患者195例,分为桡动脉组(98例)和股动脉组(97例),比较两组手术并发症、术后卧床时间、住院时间.结果与股动脉组比较,桡动脉组患者穿刺局部并发症发生率显著降低(P＜0.01);术后卧床时间、住院时间显著缩短(P＜0.01).结论经桡动脉途径行冠脉造影和介入治疗安全可行,并发症少.
목적 대경뇨동맥화고동맥도경행관상동맥조영화개입치료(PCI)환자적림상자료진행대비분석.방법 선택행PCI적환자195례,분위뇨동맥조(98례)화고동맥조(97례),비교량조수술병발증、술후와상시간、주원시간.결과 여고동맥조비교,뇨동맥조환자천자국부병발증발생솔현저강저(P＜0.01);술후와상시간、주원시간현저축단(P＜0.01).결론 경뇨동맥도경행관맥조영화개입치료안전가행,병발증소.
Objective To evaluate coronary arteriography and intervention treatment(PCI) by transradial and transfemoral approaches. Methods 195 patients undergoing PCI were divided into transradial group (98 cases) and transfemoral group(97 cases). The complications of operation, time of lying in bed after operation, length of stay were compared between two groups. Results The incidence rate of access site complication including hemorrhage and hematoma was significantly lower in transradial group (P＜0.01). The time of lying in bed after operation, length of stay were significantly shorter in transradial group than in transfemoral group(P＜0.01). Conclusion Transradial PCI can be successfully performed with excellent safety and effectiveness.There are fewer complication by the transradial approach.