CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨湿性愈合治疗腹部手术切口脂肪液化的效果.方法将40例普外科手术后切口脂肪液化的患者随机分为两组,干预组(n=20)采用湿性愈合治疗,对照组(n=20)采用常规碘仿纱治疗.结果干预组患者切口愈合时间、换药频率、换药次数、换药过程中疼痛强度均较对照组减少或降低,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论湿性愈合比碘仿纱更能有效治疗腹部手术切口脂肪液化.
목적 탐토습성유합치료복부수술절구지방액화적효과.방법 장40례보외과수술후절구지방액화적환자수궤분위량조,간예조(n=20)채용습성유합치료,대조조(n=20)채용상규전방사치료.결과 간예조환자절구유합시간、환약빈솔、환약차수、환약과정중동통강도균교대조조감소혹강저,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01).결론 습성유합비전방사경능유효치료복부수술절구지방액화.
Objective To investigate the effect of wet healing on the therapy for liquefied fat of abdominal incision. Methods A total of 40 patients with liquefied fat of abdominal incision were randomly divided into two groups, the observation group (20 eases) was the therapy group of wet healing, and the control group (20 eases) was the routine therapy group of iodoform gauze. Some index of two groups were compared, such as dressing frequency, dressing change times, healing time and pain intensity of dressing change. Results The items were significantly less in the observation group than those in the control group in terms of the healing time, dressing frequency, dressing change times, as well as pain intensity of dressing change, the differences were statistical significance( P <0. 01 ). Conclusions The effect on fat liquefaction of abdominal incision is better in wet dressing therapy than in iodoform gauze therapy.