CAJ | 학술논문

本文在理论回顾基础上,结合横向监督理论,提出将社会约束引入临时型知识团队合作能够有效激励团队合作的假设;为验证社会约束时临时型知识团队合作的影响,本文采用实验室实验中的公共品实验方法,模拟临时型知识团队的构成和运作过程;实验结果表明,社会约束能够提高临时型知识团队合作行为;最后文章为临时型知识团队合作机制设计提出建议:应引入社会制裁和经济约束以促进临时型知识团队的合作.对临时型知识团队成员应进行分类管理,通过社会约束机制营造公平的团队氛围以促进成员之间的合作,进而提高团队绩效.
본문재이론회고기출상,결합횡향감독이론,제출장사회약속인입림시형지식단대합작능구유효격려단대합작적가설;위험증사회약속시림시형지식단대합작적영향,본문채용실험실실험중적공공품실험방법,모의림시형지식단대적구성화운작과정;실험결과표명,사회약속능구제고림시형지식단대합작행위;최후문장위림시형지식단대합작궤제설계제출건의:응인입사회제재화경제약속이촉진림시형지식단대적합작.대림시형지식단대성원응진행분류관리,통과사회약속궤제영조공평적단대분위이촉진성원지간적합작,진이제고단대적효.
Based on relative theories, this paper shows some influencing factors which have effect on the cooperation of the Temporary Knowledge Teams (TKTs) members through the team dynamic mechanisms. With the theory of peer pressure, it proposes the hypothesis that social restriction can motivate the members to cooperate with each other in TKTs and social restriction includes economic constraint and non-economic constraint. Through adopting the public goods experimental design, we design an experiment with the ideology of experimental economics to simulate the construction and the operation of the TKTs to verify the effect of social restriction. The core thought of the public goods experimental design is trying to inspecting the group's investment behavior tendency to the public interest with the money as stimulation. It means that the more the public investment, the more favorable the subjects to the cooperation. The 32 subjects were undergraduate students and the graduate students of Nankai University who can embody the features of the members of temporary knowledge teams. The results of the experiment show that social restriction can motivate the members to cooperate more smoothly and deeply in TKTs. Finally, we put forward several proposals for the mechanism design of TKTs' cooperation. First, it's useful to introduce the economic constraints and the social sanction to promote the cooperation among TKTs members. Second, classification management should be applied to the TKTs ' members, it means that to the 100%-PCR(Public Contribution Rate) members, we should commend them appropriately; to the 1-99%-PCR members, we should implement the effective social restriction mechanisms to urge them to cooperate with others; and to the 0%-PCR members, we should reject them from the group as possible as one can. Third, it's necessary and helpful to build fair team atmosphere to promote the member's cooperation and the performance of the team through the adoption of social restriction mechanisms.