国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2010年
2期
222-224
,共3页
梁平%黄敏莲%罗健%陶芝英%徐卫军
樑平%黃敏蓮%囉健%陶芝英%徐衛軍
량평%황민련%라건%도지영%서위군
腰痛%腰-硬联合麻醉%中药热敷%手法
腰痛%腰-硬聯閤痳醉%中藥熱敷%手法
요통%요-경연합마취%중약열부%수법
Lumbar pain%Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia%Herbal fomentation%Manipulation
目的 探讨手法联合中药热敷治疗对腰-硬联合麻醉患者疼痛和临床疗效的影响.方法 选择2008年4月至2009年5月收治的行腰-硬联合麻醉、全子宫切除术的妇科患者94例,分为治疗组(63例)和对照组(31例).对照组给予常规腰部放松疗法,治疗组在对照组的基础上给予手法联合中药热敷治疗.3天为1个疗程,1个疗程后进行疗效评定.结果 经疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价,治疗组治疗后评分平均为(2.47±1.42)分.对照组平均为(4.35±1.63)分,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P值<0.01).治疗组总有效率为90.48%;对照组总有效率为77.42%.Ridit检验提示,总有效率比较,治疗组优于对照组(u=3.42,P值<0.01).结论 手法联合中药热敷治疗腰-硬联合麻醉后腰痛,能明显改善腰痛症状,提高临床疗效.
目的 探討手法聯閤中藥熱敷治療對腰-硬聯閤痳醉患者疼痛和臨床療效的影響.方法 選擇2008年4月至2009年5月收治的行腰-硬聯閤痳醉、全子宮切除術的婦科患者94例,分為治療組(63例)和對照組(31例).對照組給予常規腰部放鬆療法,治療組在對照組的基礎上給予手法聯閤中藥熱敷治療.3天為1箇療程,1箇療程後進行療效評定.結果 經疼痛視覺模擬評分法(VAS)評價,治療組治療後評分平均為(2.47±1.42)分.對照組平均為(4.35±1.63)分,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(P值<0.01).治療組總有效率為90.48%;對照組總有效率為77.42%.Ridit檢驗提示,總有效率比較,治療組優于對照組(u=3.42,P值<0.01).結論 手法聯閤中藥熱敷治療腰-硬聯閤痳醉後腰痛,能明顯改善腰痛癥狀,提高臨床療效.
목적 탐토수법연합중약열부치료대요-경연합마취환자동통화림상료효적영향.방법 선택2008년4월지2009년5월수치적행요-경연합마취、전자궁절제술적부과환자94례,분위치료조(63례)화대조조(31례).대조조급여상규요부방송요법,치료조재대조조적기출상급여수법연합중약열부치료.3천위1개료정,1개료정후진행료효평정.결과 경동통시각모의평분법(VAS)평개,치료조치료후평분평균위(2.47±1.42)분.대조조평균위(4.35±1.63)분,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(P치<0.01).치료조총유효솔위90.48%;대조조총유효솔위77.42%.Ridit검험제시,총유효솔비교,치료조우우대조조(u=3.42,P치<0.01).결론 수법연합중약열부치료요-경연합마취후요통,능명현개선요통증상,제고림상료효.
Objective To investigate the effects of manipulative combined with herbal fomentation on lumbar pain after combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Methods 94 cases with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and total laparoscopic hysterectomy from our hospital were enrolled from April 2008 to May 2009.They were divided into control group and treatment group according to patient's will.Patients of the control group received routine relaxation treatment; Patients of the treatment group received manipulative combined with herbal fomentation.Three days as a course.Curative effects were assessed one courses later. Pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale before and after the treatment.Results It was ( 2.47±.42 ) after treatment in the control group, and ( 4.35±1.63 ) in the treatment group.The decrease was more significant in the treatment group than the control group( P<0.0l ).The total effective rate was 90.48% in the control group; and 77.42%in the treatment group ( P< 0.01 ).Conclusions Manipulative combined herbal fomentation can remarkably relieve lumbar pain and improve clinical curative effect in the patients with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.