中国医师进修杂志
中國醫師進脩雜誌
중국의사진수잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATES OF MEDICINE
2009年
26期
26-28
,共3页
秦长江%孙嵩洛%马万里%郑立%刘大晗
秦長江%孫嵩洛%馬萬裏%鄭立%劉大晗
진장강%손숭락%마만리%정립%류대함
Hirsehsprung病%外科手术%治疗结果
Hirsehsprung病%外科手術%治療結果
Hirsehsprung병%외과수술%치료결과
Hirsehsprung disease%Surgiealprocedures,operative%Treatmentouteome
目的 探讨经肛门改良Soave术与开腹手术对先天性巨结肠患儿疗效的差别.方法 取2001年1月至2007年1月经肛门改良Soave术(改良组,2l例)及开腹手术(开腹组,25例)治疗先天性巨结肠患儿46例,分析比较两组患儿的临床疗效.结果 术后48h改良组白细胞介素-6、C反应蛋白水平[分别为(10.7±1.6)ng/L、(27.7±4.1)mg/L]低于开腹组[分别为(22.0±2.3)ng/L、(73.7±15.0)mg/L](P<0.01),且手术时间[(94.0±11.7)min]、住院时间[(7.9±1.1)d]、胃肠功能恢复时间[(2.2±0.7)d]及住院费用[(9030.5±1203.3)元]均低于开腹组[分别为(110.6±10.2)min、(11.9±4.2)d、(3.9±0.7)d、(11350.6±2412.7)元](P<0.01).改良组术后并发症总发生率(9.5%,2/21)明显低于开腹组(24.0%,6/25)(P<0.05).术后1年肛管高压区长度、肛管静息压两组比较差异无统计学意义.结论 经肛门改良Soave术较开腹手术具有创伤小、费用低等优点,适用于治疗婴幼儿的短段型和常见型先天性巨结肠.
目的 探討經肛門改良Soave術與開腹手術對先天性巨結腸患兒療效的差彆.方法 取2001年1月至2007年1月經肛門改良Soave術(改良組,2l例)及開腹手術(開腹組,25例)治療先天性巨結腸患兒46例,分析比較兩組患兒的臨床療效.結果 術後48h改良組白細胞介素-6、C反應蛋白水平[分彆為(10.7±1.6)ng/L、(27.7±4.1)mg/L]低于開腹組[分彆為(22.0±2.3)ng/L、(73.7±15.0)mg/L](P<0.01),且手術時間[(94.0±11.7)min]、住院時間[(7.9±1.1)d]、胃腸功能恢複時間[(2.2±0.7)d]及住院費用[(9030.5±1203.3)元]均低于開腹組[分彆為(110.6±10.2)min、(11.9±4.2)d、(3.9±0.7)d、(11350.6±2412.7)元](P<0.01).改良組術後併髮癥總髮生率(9.5%,2/21)明顯低于開腹組(24.0%,6/25)(P<0.05).術後1年肛管高壓區長度、肛管靜息壓兩組比較差異無統計學意義.結論 經肛門改良Soave術較開腹手術具有創傷小、費用低等優點,適用于治療嬰幼兒的短段型和常見型先天性巨結腸.
목적 탐토경항문개량Soave술여개복수술대선천성거결장환인료효적차별.방법 취2001년1월지2007년1월경항문개량Soave술(개량조,2l례)급개복수술(개복조,25례)치료선천성거결장환인46례,분석비교량조환인적림상료효.결과 술후48h개량조백세포개소-6、C반응단백수평[분별위(10.7±1.6)ng/L、(27.7±4.1)mg/L]저우개복조[분별위(22.0±2.3)ng/L、(73.7±15.0)mg/L](P<0.01),차수술시간[(94.0±11.7)min]、주원시간[(7.9±1.1)d]、위장공능회복시간[(2.2±0.7)d]급주원비용[(9030.5±1203.3)원]균저우개복조[분별위(110.6±10.2)min、(11.9±4.2)d、(3.9±0.7)d、(11350.6±2412.7)원](P<0.01).개량조술후병발증총발생솔(9.5%,2/21)명현저우개복조(24.0%,6/25)(P<0.05).술후1년항관고압구장도、항관정식압량조비교차이무통계학의의.결론 경항문개량Soave술교개복수술구유창상소、비용저등우점,괄용우치료영유인적단단형화상견형선천성거결장.
Objective To make a comparison between the outcome of modified Soave procedure and laparotomy on Hirschsprung disease(HD)in children.Method Chose the 21 eases who underwent transanal modified Soave procedure(modified Soave procedure group)and 25 eases had done by laparotomy (laparotomy group)from January 2001 to January 2007,clinical data of two groups were compared.Results Modified Soave procedure group showed lower level of IL-6 and CRP[(10.7±1.6)ng/L,(27.7±4.1)mg/L]on 48 h postoperation than laparotomy group[(22.0±2.3)ng/L,(73.7±15.0)mg/L](P < 0.01).The mean operative time,hospital stay,the mean time of anal aerofluxus and the cost of hospitalization in modified Soave procedure group were much shorter than those in laparotomy group(P< 0.01).While the complication rate of two groups had no statistical difference.Moreover,there were no significant difference of rectal high pressure zone length and resting anal canal pressure between two groups at 1 year after operation.Conclusion Transanal modified Soave procedure for HD is a minimal invasive surgery,especially in young patients with short-segment type and common type of HD.