中华麻醉学杂志
中華痳醉學雜誌
중화마취학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY
2010年
10期
1236-1238
,共3页
曹江北%王鹏%冯雪辛%米卫东%张宏
曹江北%王鵬%馮雪辛%米衛東%張宏
조강북%왕붕%풍설신%미위동%장굉
喉面罩%呼吸,人工%腹腔镜检查%套囊压力
喉麵罩%呼吸,人工%腹腔鏡檢查%套囊壓力
후면조%호흡,인공%복강경검사%투낭압력
Laryngeal masks%Respiration,artificial%Laparoscopy%Cuff pressure
目的 评价低套囊压力下ProSeal和Supreme喉罩用于腹腔镜手术患者气道管理的效果.方法 择期仰卧位腹腔镜手术患者60例,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄20~70岁,体重50~80 kg,随机分为ProSeal喉罩组(P组)和Supreme喉罩组(S组),每组30例.喉罩置入成功后,用手持测压计监测套囊充气压力并维持其为35 cm H2O,记录气道密闭压及气腹前后机械通气时气道压峰值和平均气道压,记录术后并发症的发生情况.结果 两组气腹后机械通气时气道压峰值高于气腹前(P<0.05),两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术中气腹前后均无漏气现象发生;两组气道密闭压比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组拔除喉罩后表面带有血丝及术后咽痛发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论低套囊压力(35 cm H2O)下ProSeal和Supreme喉罩通气效果均较好,可安全地用于腹腔镜手术患者的气道管理.
目的 評價低套囊壓力下ProSeal和Supreme喉罩用于腹腔鏡手術患者氣道管理的效果.方法 擇期仰臥位腹腔鏡手術患者60例,ASA分級Ⅰ或Ⅱ級,年齡20~70歲,體重50~80 kg,隨機分為ProSeal喉罩組(P組)和Supreme喉罩組(S組),每組30例.喉罩置入成功後,用手持測壓計鑑測套囊充氣壓力併維持其為35 cm H2O,記錄氣道密閉壓及氣腹前後機械通氣時氣道壓峰值和平均氣道壓,記錄術後併髮癥的髮生情況.結果 兩組氣腹後機械通氣時氣道壓峰值高于氣腹前(P<0.05),兩組間比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);術中氣腹前後均無漏氣現象髮生;兩組氣道密閉壓比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);兩組拔除喉罩後錶麵帶有血絲及術後嚥痛髮生率比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論低套囊壓力(35 cm H2O)下ProSeal和Supreme喉罩通氣效果均較好,可安全地用于腹腔鏡手術患者的氣道管理.
목적 평개저투낭압력하ProSeal화Supreme후조용우복강경수술환자기도관리적효과.방법 택기앙와위복강경수술환자60례,ASA분급Ⅰ혹Ⅱ급,년령20~70세,체중50~80 kg,수궤분위ProSeal후조조(P조)화Supreme후조조(S조),매조30례.후조치입성공후,용수지측압계감측투낭충기압력병유지기위35 cm H2O,기록기도밀폐압급기복전후궤계통기시기도압봉치화평균기도압,기록술후병발증적발생정황.결과 량조기복후궤계통기시기도압봉치고우기복전(P<0.05),량조간비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);술중기복전후균무루기현상발생;량조기도밀폐압비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);량조발제후조후표면대유혈사급술후인통발생솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론저투낭압력(35 cm H2O)하ProSeal화Supreme후조통기효과균교호,가안전지용우복강경수술환자적기도관리.
Objective To assess the efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Proseal (LMA Proseal) and Supreme (LMA Supreme) used in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery when the cuff-pressure was 35 cm H2O.Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 20-70 yr, weighing 50-80 kg, undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery, were randomized into2 groups (n = 30 each): LMA ProSeal group (group P) and LMA Supreme group (group S). After the LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme were inserted in group P and S respectively, the cuff pressure was monitored and maintained at 35 cm H2O by manipulate manometer. The airway sealing pressure, peak and mean airway pressure before and after pneumoperitoneum during mechanical ventilation and the complications were also recorded. Results The peak airway pressure was significantly higher after pneumoperitoneum than before pneumoperitoneum during mechanical ventilation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the peak airway pressure before and after pneumoperitoneum between the two groups ( P > 0.05). The air leakage had never happened before or after pneumoperitoneum during mechanical ventilation. There was no significant difference in the airway sealing pressure between the two groups ( P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of throat pain between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion When the cuff pressure is 35 cm H2O, the LMA ProSeal and Supreme can provide adequate ventilation during operation with fewer complications and can be used safely for laparoscopic surgery.