CAJ | 학술논문

目的观察颅内动脉瘤介入栓塞术配合化瘀止血中药治疗蛛网膜下腔出血的临床疗效.方法 45例蛛网膜下腔出血患者,随机分为对照组和治疗组,其中对照组单纯予以颅内动脉瘤介入栓塞术治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上应用化瘀止血中药治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效.结果治疗组临床疗效明显高于对照组,二者比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.0321,P<0.05).结论应用颅内动脉瘤介入栓塞术配合化瘀止血中药对蛛网膜下腔出血的治疗效果优于颅内动脉瘤介入栓塞术.
목적 관찰로내동맥류개입전새술배합화어지혈중약치료주망막하강출혈적림상료효.방법 45례주망막하강출혈환자,수궤분위대조조화치료조,기중대조조단순여이로내동맥류개입전새술치료,치료조재대조조기출상응용화어지혈중약치료,비교량조환자적림상료효.결과 치료조림상료효명현고우대조조,이자비교차이유통계학의의(P=0.0321,P<0.05).결론 응용로내동맥류개입전새술배합화어지혈중약대주망막하강출혈적치료효과우우로내동맥류개입전새술.
Objective To observe clinical effects of treating subarachnoid hemorrhage with intracranial aneurysm interventional embolization combined with Chinese herbs of removing blood stasis and hemostasis. Methods 45 cases with subarachnoid hemorrhage were randomly reeurited into a control group and a treatment group. The control group was treated with intracranial aneurysm interventional embolization, and the treatment group was treated with intracranial aneurysm interventional embolization combined with Chinese herbs with the functions of removing blood stasis and hemostasis. The clinical effect was observed between the groups. Results The clinical effect in the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P< 0.05 ). Conclusion The treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage with intracranial aneurysm interventional embolization combined with Chinese herbs of removing blood stasis and hemostasis is better than intracranial aneurysm interventional embolization exclusively.