CAJ | 학술논문

目的寻求更好的系统解剖学教学方法.方法将泰山医学院2008级本科护理学专业(麻醉护理与重症监护方向)1班和2班109名学生分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用以学习小组为基础的问题讨论式教学方法,对照组采用传统的教学方法讲授系统解剖学.课程结束后,两组学生采用相同的试题进行闭卷考试,并对实验组学生进行问卷调查.结果实验组学生考试成绩的及格率和优秀率均高于对照组学生,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组95.0%以上的学生对以学习小组为基础的问题讨论式教学方法持肯定态度.结论以学习小组为基础的问题讨论式教学方法优于传统教学方法.
목적 심구경호적계통해부학교학방법.방법 장태산의학원2008급본과호이학전업(마취호리여중증감호방향)1반화2반109명학생분위실험조화대조조,실험조채용이학습소조위기출적문제토론식교학방법,대조조채용전통적교학방법강수계통해부학.과정결속후,량조학생채용상동적시제진행폐권고시,병대실험조학생진행문권조사.결과 실험조학생고시성적적급격솔화우수솔균고우대조조학생,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);실험조95.0%이상적학생대이학습소조위기출적문제토론식교학방법지긍정태도.결론 이학습소조위기출적문제토론식교학방법우우전통교학방법.
Objective To seek the better teaching methods in the teaching course of systematic anatomy. Methods The subjects of 109 nursing students were divided into the trial group and the control group. The "problem-disscuss" teaching method based on learning groups was performed in the trial group while the traditional teaching method was done in the control group. After the course of systematic anatomy was finished, the two groups were tested with the same test paper,and the trial group were investigated.Results The testing result of the trial group was higher than that of the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05), and 95. 0% students approved the " problem-disscussion" teaching method based on learning groups. Conclusions The " problem-disscussion" teaching method based on learning groups was superior to the traditional teaching method.