中华老年医学杂志
中華老年醫學雜誌
중화노년의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
2011年
5期
381-383
,共3页
王凯华%杨丽翠%林苗%黄旭梅%王军
王凱華%楊麗翠%林苗%黃旭梅%王軍
왕개화%양려취%림묘%황욱매%왕군
心房颤动%超声检查,多普勒,彩色
心房顫動%超聲檢查,多普勒,綵色
심방전동%초성검사,다보륵,채색
Atrial fibrillation%Ultrasonography doppler,color
目的 研究老年阵发性心房颤动(房颤)患者心房内和心房间的不同步运动,并进一步探讨其不同步性的影响因素.方法 采用组织多普勒成像(TDI)技术,在心尖四腔观测右心房游离壁、房间隔和左心房游离壁各取样点处心电图P波开始到TDI(PW-TDI)上A波起始点的时限:右心房(P-RA)、房间隔(P-IAS)、左心房(P-LA).比较 51例非老年对照组、40例老年对照组与52例老年阵发性房颤组心房内和心房间的不同步性.应用多因素逐步回归方法探讨老年阵发性房颤患者心房不同步的主要影响因素.结果 老年阵发性房颤患者的左房内、心房间不同步性较老年对照组显著增大(P<0.01),右心房内不同步性差异无统计学意义.老年阵发性房颤组多因素逐步回归分析结果显示,左房内不同步性与收缩压(x2)、年龄(x1)、左室质量指数(LVMI,x5)具有相关性,回归方程为Y=-57.241+0.481 x1+ 0.223 x2+0.294 x5.结论 老年阵发性房颤患者存在显著的左心房内、心房间不同步性;收缩压、年龄、LVMI是老年阵发性房颤患者左心房内、心房间不同步性的主要影响因素.
目的 研究老年陣髮性心房顫動(房顫)患者心房內和心房間的不同步運動,併進一步探討其不同步性的影響因素.方法 採用組織多普勒成像(TDI)技術,在心尖四腔觀測右心房遊離壁、房間隔和左心房遊離壁各取樣點處心電圖P波開始到TDI(PW-TDI)上A波起始點的時限:右心房(P-RA)、房間隔(P-IAS)、左心房(P-LA).比較 51例非老年對照組、40例老年對照組與52例老年陣髮性房顫組心房內和心房間的不同步性.應用多因素逐步迴歸方法探討老年陣髮性房顫患者心房不同步的主要影響因素.結果 老年陣髮性房顫患者的左房內、心房間不同步性較老年對照組顯著增大(P<0.01),右心房內不同步性差異無統計學意義.老年陣髮性房顫組多因素逐步迴歸分析結果顯示,左房內不同步性與收縮壓(x2)、年齡(x1)、左室質量指數(LVMI,x5)具有相關性,迴歸方程為Y=-57.241+0.481 x1+ 0.223 x2+0.294 x5.結論 老年陣髮性房顫患者存在顯著的左心房內、心房間不同步性;收縮壓、年齡、LVMI是老年陣髮性房顫患者左心房內、心房間不同步性的主要影響因素.
목적 연구노년진발성심방전동(방전)환자심방내화심방간적불동보운동,병진일보탐토기불동보성적영향인소.방법 채용조직다보륵성상(TDI)기술,재심첨사강관측우심방유리벽、방간격화좌심방유리벽각취양점처심전도P파개시도TDI(PW-TDI)상A파기시점적시한:우심방(P-RA)、방간격(P-IAS)、좌심방(P-LA).비교 51례비노년대조조、40례노년대조조여52례노년진발성방전조심방내화심방간적불동보성.응용다인소축보회귀방법탐토노년진발성방전환자심방불동보적주요영향인소.결과 노년진발성방전환자적좌방내、심방간불동보성교노년대조조현저증대(P<0.01),우심방내불동보성차이무통계학의의.노년진발성방전조다인소축보회귀분석결과현시,좌방내불동보성여수축압(x2)、년령(x1)、좌실질량지수(LVMI,x5)구유상관성,회귀방정위Y=-57.241+0.481 x1+ 0.223 x2+0.294 x5.결론 노년진발성방전환자존재현저적좌심방내、심방간불동보성;수축압、년령、LVMI시노년진발성방전환자좌심방내、심방간불동보성적주요영향인소.
Objective To evaluate intra- and interatrial asynchrony and its determinants in aged patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) by using tissue Doppler imaging. Methods Ninty-one patients without PAF (control group, including 40 elder patients and 51 non-elder patients) and 52 aged patients with PAF were included. As to assessment of intra- and interatrial synchronicity, the atrioventricular plane were selected on the right atrial (RA) free wall, interatrial septum (IAS), and left atrial (LA) free wall. The time differences from the onset of the P wave to the onset of the A wave at the left atrium (P-LA), the IAS (P-IAS), and the right atrium (P-RA) were measured. Intra-atrial asynchrony was defined as the differences between P-IAS and P-RA (RA asynchrony) and between P-LA and P-IAS (LA asynchrony). Interatrial asynchrony was defined as the difference between P-LA and P-RA. Stepwise regression was made to determine the influencing factors for atrial asynchrony in aged patients with PAF. Results Compared with the control group, aged patients with PAF had significant LA and interatrial asynchrony (P<0.01). Multivariate stepwise regression demonstrated that systolic blood pressure (x2), age (x1) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI x5) entered the regression equation in aged patients with PAF (Y=-57.241+0.481 x1+0.223 x2+0.294 x5). Conclusions Aged patients with PAF have LA and interatrial asynchrony. LVH, aged and SBP are important factors leading to these asynchronies in the aged patients with PAF.