CAJ | 학술논문

通过对等圆心角斜条分法(D条分法)及传统条分法求解安全系数过程的分析,定性地分析了D条分法与传统条分法的不同之处,再结合澳大利亚ACADS考核算例计算结果,对D条分法与传统条分法的差异加以定量分析,同时也对定性分析结论的正确性加以验证.结果表明,D条分法与传统条分法已经有很大程度的不同,当平均应力水平接近于0或1时,所得出的安全系数与传统条分法得出的安全系数的差异将更大,应直接采用平均应力水平来评价土坡的稳定性.
통과대등원심각사조분법(D조분법)급전통조분법구해안전계수과정적분석,정성지분석료D조분법여전통조분법적불동지처,재결합오대리아ACADS고핵산례계산결과,대D조분법여전통조분법적차이가이정량분석,동시야대정성분석결론적정학성가이험증.결과표명,D조분법여전통조분법이경유흔대정도적불동,당평균응력수평접근우0혹1시,소득출적안전계수여전통조분법득출적안전계수적차이장경대,응직접채용평균응력수평래평개토파적은정성.
Through analysis of the solution processes of safety factors using the gradient slice method with equal central angles (referred to as the D slice method) and the traditional slice methods, the difference between them was qualitatively analyzed. Furthermore, based on the calculated results of three examples from ACADS, Australia, the above difference was quantitatively analyzed, and the accuracy of the result of the qualitative analysis was validated. The results show that the D slice method is quite different from the traditional slice methods, especially when the average stress level is close to 0 or 1. In that case the difference between the safety factors of the present and traditional methods will be larger. The average stress level should be used to directly evaluate the stability of soil slopes.