中华实验外科杂志
中華實驗外科雜誌
중화실험외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY
2011年
5期
700-702
,共3页
王加祥%韩宝三%吴旭波%余松林%彭承宏
王加祥%韓寶三%吳旭波%餘鬆林%彭承宏
왕가상%한보삼%오욱파%여송림%팽승굉
肝细胞%微囊%壳聚糖
肝細胞%微囊%殼聚糖
간세포%미낭%각취당
Hepatocyte%Microcapsules%Chitosan
目的 观察壳聚糖相对分子质量对微囊机械强度和通透性及包裹肝细胞活性的影响.方法 通过微囊搅拌实验比较中、低分子量壳聚糖形成的微囊的机械强度,比较2种微囊对异硫氰酸荧光素标记的牛血清白蛋白(FITC-BSA)通透性,及细胞染色实验判断2种微囊包裹小鼠原代肝细胞活性的区别.结果 微囊搅拌100 min后中分子量壳聚糖微囊破损率100%,低分子量壳聚糖微囊破损率5%,两种微囊机械强度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),微囊溶液中加入HTC-BSA15 min后,低分子量壳聚糖微囊内荧光强度为4 AU,中分子量壳聚糖微囊内荧光强度为1.5 AU,两种微囊对FITC-BSA的通透性差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),低分子量壳聚糖形成的微囊包裹肝细胞培养1周后细胞染色实验显示微囊中活肝细胞数为100%,中分子量壳聚糖形成的微囊包裹的活肝细胞数约为40%,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 低分子量壳聚糖相对于中分子量壳聚糖更适合于作微囊的材料.
目的 觀察殼聚糖相對分子質量對微囊機械彊度和通透性及包裹肝細胞活性的影響.方法 通過微囊攪拌實驗比較中、低分子量殼聚糖形成的微囊的機械彊度,比較2種微囊對異硫氰痠熒光素標記的牛血清白蛋白(FITC-BSA)通透性,及細胞染色實驗判斷2種微囊包裹小鼠原代肝細胞活性的區彆.結果 微囊攪拌100 min後中分子量殼聚糖微囊破損率100%,低分子量殼聚糖微囊破損率5%,兩種微囊機械彊度差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),微囊溶液中加入HTC-BSA15 min後,低分子量殼聚糖微囊內熒光彊度為4 AU,中分子量殼聚糖微囊內熒光彊度為1.5 AU,兩種微囊對FITC-BSA的通透性差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),低分子量殼聚糖形成的微囊包裹肝細胞培養1週後細胞染色實驗顯示微囊中活肝細胞數為100%,中分子量殼聚糖形成的微囊包裹的活肝細胞數約為40%,兩者差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 低分子量殼聚糖相對于中分子量殼聚糖更適閤于作微囊的材料.
목적 관찰각취당상대분자질량대미낭궤계강도화통투성급포과간세포활성적영향.방법 통과미낭교반실험비교중、저분자량각취당형성적미낭적궤계강도,비교2충미낭대이류청산형광소표기적우혈청백단백(FITC-BSA)통투성,급세포염색실험판단2충미낭포과소서원대간세포활성적구별.결과 미낭교반100 min후중분자량각취당미낭파손솔100%,저분자량각취당미낭파손솔5%,량충미낭궤계강도차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),미낭용액중가입HTC-BSA15 min후,저분자량각취당미낭내형광강도위4 AU,중분자량각취당미낭내형광강도위1.5 AU,량충미낭대FITC-BSA적통투성차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),저분자량각취당형성적미낭포과간세포배양1주후세포염색실험현시미낭중활간세포수위100%,중분자량각취당형성적미낭포과적활간세포수약위40%,량자차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 저분자량각취당상대우중분자량각취당경괄합우작미낭적재료.
Objective To study the influence of molecular weight of chitosan on microcapsules and hepatocytes in microcapsules. Methods The mechanical strength, permeability to fluoresceine isothiocyanate-bovine serum albumin (FITC-BSA) and activity of hepatocytes in microcapsules were compared between two kinds of microcapsules made by low and middle molecular weight chitosan. Results After 100 min of stirring microcapsules, all middle molecular weight chitosan microcapsules were damaged, 5% low molecular weight chitosan microcapsules were damaged. There was significant difference in breakage rate of the mechanical strength between two microcapsules (P < 0. 05). Fifteen min after addition of FITCBSA into microcapsule solution, fluorescence intensity in the low molecular weight chitosan microcapsules was 4 AU, and that in middle molecular weight of chitosan microcapsules was 1. 5 AU, suggesting there was significant difference in permeability to FITC-BSA between two kinds of microcapsules (P < 0. 05).One week after culture of microencapsulated hepatocytes, staining test showed that 100% of liver cells in low molecular weight chitosan microcapsules were alive, while the number was about 40% in middle molecular weight chitosan microcapsules (P < 0. 05). Conclusion Low molecular weight chitosan is more suitable as materials of microcapsules than molecular weight chitosan.