中华眼科杂志
中華眼科雜誌
중화안과잡지
Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
2011年
1期
35-38
,共4页
周静%刘武%李翔%李倩%郝静%王心蕾
週靜%劉武%李翔%李倩%郝靜%王心蕾
주정%류무%리상%리천%학정%왕심뢰
视野检查法%视网膜%视敏度%老年人
視野檢查法%視網膜%視敏度%老年人
시야검사법%시망막%시민도%노년인
Perimetry%Retina%Visual acuity%Aged
目的 研究Microperimeter(MP)-1微视野计检测中老年人正常眼黄斑区视网膜光敏感度及固视率的正常值.方法 正常值测定.应用MP-1微视野计检测60名(60只眼)41~70岁健康受检者正常眼黄斑中心10°范围视网膜功能.根据受检者年龄分为3组,A组41~50岁,B组51~60岁,C组61~70岁.各年龄组间黄斑中心10°范围视网膜平均光敏感度和黄斑中心凹不同位置间平均光敏感度比较均采用秩和检验,前者以P<0.017、后者以P<0.025作为差异有统计学意义;受检者年龄与视网膜平均光敏感度的相关性采用相关分析法.结果 60只眼的黄斑中心10°范围内视网膜平均光敏感度为(19.7833±0.4906)dB,距黄斑中心5°、3°、1°环上的视网膜平均光敏感度分别为(19.5117±1.1044)、(19.8542±0.4099)及(19.9183±0.3895)dB.黄斑中心2°和4°范围内的平均固视率分别为(88.4667±9.9600)%和(97.2000±3.9091)%.距黄斑中心5°与3°环上的视网膜平均光敏感度比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.943,P<0.025);距黄斑中心3°与1°环上的视网膜平均光敏感度比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.367,P<0.025).结论 MP-1微视野计检查可用于评价黄斑区视网膜功能.3个年龄组间黄斑中心10°范围内视网膜平均光敏感度基本接近;距黄斑中心的距离不同,视网膜平均光敏感度不同;中老年人年龄与视网膜光敏感度不相关.
目的 研究Microperimeter(MP)-1微視野計檢測中老年人正常眼黃斑區視網膜光敏感度及固視率的正常值.方法 正常值測定.應用MP-1微視野計檢測60名(60隻眼)41~70歲健康受檢者正常眼黃斑中心10°範圍視網膜功能.根據受檢者年齡分為3組,A組41~50歲,B組51~60歲,C組61~70歲.各年齡組間黃斑中心10°範圍視網膜平均光敏感度和黃斑中心凹不同位置間平均光敏感度比較均採用秩和檢驗,前者以P<0.017、後者以P<0.025作為差異有統計學意義;受檢者年齡與視網膜平均光敏感度的相關性採用相關分析法.結果 60隻眼的黃斑中心10°範圍內視網膜平均光敏感度為(19.7833±0.4906)dB,距黃斑中心5°、3°、1°環上的視網膜平均光敏感度分彆為(19.5117±1.1044)、(19.8542±0.4099)及(19.9183±0.3895)dB.黃斑中心2°和4°範圍內的平均固視率分彆為(88.4667±9.9600)%和(97.2000±3.9091)%.距黃斑中心5°與3°環上的視網膜平均光敏感度比較,差異有統計學意義(Z=-2.943,P<0.025);距黃斑中心3°與1°環上的視網膜平均光敏感度比較,差異有統計學意義(Z=-2.367,P<0.025).結論 MP-1微視野計檢查可用于評價黃斑區視網膜功能.3箇年齡組間黃斑中心10°範圍內視網膜平均光敏感度基本接近;距黃斑中心的距離不同,視網膜平均光敏感度不同;中老年人年齡與視網膜光敏感度不相關.
목적 연구Microperimeter(MP)-1미시야계검측중노년인정상안황반구시망막광민감도급고시솔적정상치.방법 정상치측정.응용MP-1미시야계검측60명(60지안)41~70세건강수검자정상안황반중심10°범위시망막공능.근거수검자년령분위3조,A조41~50세,B조51~60세,C조61~70세.각년령조간황반중심10°범위시망막평균광민감도화황반중심요불동위치간평균광민감도비교균채용질화검험,전자이P<0.017、후자이P<0.025작위차이유통계학의의;수검자년령여시망막평균광민감도적상관성채용상관분석법.결과 60지안적황반중심10°범위내시망막평균광민감도위(19.7833±0.4906)dB,거황반중심5°、3°、1°배상적시망막평균광민감도분별위(19.5117±1.1044)、(19.8542±0.4099)급(19.9183±0.3895)dB.황반중심2°화4°범위내적평균고시솔분별위(88.4667±9.9600)%화(97.2000±3.9091)%.거황반중심5°여3°배상적시망막평균광민감도비교,차이유통계학의의(Z=-2.943,P<0.025);거황반중심3°여1°배상적시망막평균광민감도비교,차이유통계학의의(Z=-2.367,P<0.025).결론 MP-1미시야계검사가용우평개황반구시망막공능.3개년령조간황반중심10°범위내시망막평균광민감도기본접근;거황반중심적거리불동,시망막평균광민감도불동;중노년인년령여시망막광민감도불상관.
Objective To investigate the macular retinal sensitivity and fixation stability rates in normal subjects of middle and old age by using the MP-1 microperimeter. Methods This was a normal value test which enrolled 60 healthy subjects aging from 41 to 70 years old. It detected the retinal function of the central 10 degrees of the macular by using the MP-1 microperimeter. Sixty subjects were divided into three groups according to their ages: group A from 41 to 50, group B from 51 to 60 and group C from 61 to 70. Rank and testing methods were used to compare the mean retinal sensitivity (MS) within the central 10 degrees of the macular among the three groups, and P <0. 017 was used for statistical significance. Rank and testing methods were used to compare MS of different locations in the macular fovea, and P < 0. 025 was used for statistical significance. Correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the age and retinal MS values. Results The retinal MS within the central 10 degrees of the macular in 60 eyes of the 60 subjects was ( 19.7833 ± 0.4906) dB, and were ( 19.5117 ± 1. 1044), ( 19.8542 ± 0.4099) and ( 19. 9183 ±0. 3895) dB at 5 degrees, 3 degrees and 1 degree from the center of the macular, respectively.The mean fixation stability rates within 2 degrees and 4 degrees were (88. 4667 ±9. 9600)% and (97. 2000 ±3.9091 ) %, respectively. There was statistical significance between retinal MS at 5 degrees and at 3 degrees from the center of the macular ( Z = - 2. 943, P < 0. 025 ); there was also statistical significance between retinal MS at 3 degrees and at 1 degree from the center of the macular ( Z = - 2. 367, P < 0. 025 ).Conclusions MP-1 microperimetry examination could be used to evaluate the macular retinal function.There is no difference in the retinal MS within the central 10 degrees of the macular among the three groups of normal subjects of different ages. The retinal MS difference is statistically significant with different distances from the center of the macular; but there is no correlation between the age and the retinal sensitivities in normal subjects of middle and old age.