国际护理学杂志
國際護理學雜誌
국제호이학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING
2010年
9期
1299-1303
,共5页
徐秀瑛%姜小鹰%陈小玉%郑益娇%全丽丽
徐秀瑛%薑小鷹%陳小玉%鄭益嬌%全麗麗
서수영%강소응%진소옥%정익교%전려려
抑郁症%护理干预%生活质量
抑鬱癥%護理榦預%生活質量
억욱증%호리간예%생활질량
Major depression%Nursing intervention%Quality of life
目的 探讨护理干预对住院抑郁患者生活质量的影响.方法 将住院的抑郁患者80例,随机分为干预组与对照组各40例.干预组进行为期8周的支持性护理干预,干预结束后,采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)、简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)和健康调查问卷(SF-36)调查两组病人8周时的抑郁状态、应对方式和生活质量.结果 干预组病人干预8周后SDS分数显著低于对照组(P＜0.05);干预组病人干预8周后SDS分数低于干预前(入院时),比较有统计学意义(P＜0.05).干预组的SCSQ在干预8周后积极应对得分高于对照组(P＜0.05),消极得分与对照组差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).干预组在干预8周时PF、SF、BP、MH四个维度得分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).干预组干预8周后PF、RE、SF、BP、MH和GH六个维度得分高于干预前(入院时),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 对抑郁症患者给予支持性护理干预能减轻病人的抑郁症状,提高其心理社会方面的生活质量,对病人进行支持性的护理干预具有重要意义.
目的 探討護理榦預對住院抑鬱患者生活質量的影響.方法 將住院的抑鬱患者80例,隨機分為榦預組與對照組各40例.榦預組進行為期8週的支持性護理榦預,榦預結束後,採用抑鬱自評量錶(SDS)、簡易應對方式問捲(SCSQ)和健康調查問捲(SF-36)調查兩組病人8週時的抑鬱狀態、應對方式和生活質量.結果 榦預組病人榦預8週後SDS分數顯著低于對照組(P＜0.05);榦預組病人榦預8週後SDS分數低于榦預前(入院時),比較有統計學意義(P＜0.05).榦預組的SCSQ在榦預8週後積極應對得分高于對照組(P＜0.05),消極得分與對照組差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05).榦預組在榦預8週時PF、SF、BP、MH四箇維度得分高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05).榦預組榦預8週後PF、RE、SF、BP、MH和GH六箇維度得分高于榦預前(入院時),差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05).結論 對抑鬱癥患者給予支持性護理榦預能減輕病人的抑鬱癥狀,提高其心理社會方麵的生活質量,對病人進行支持性的護理榦預具有重要意義.
목적 탐토호리간예대주원억욱환자생활질량적영향.방법 장주원적억욱환자80례,수궤분위간예조여대조조각40례.간예조진행위기8주적지지성호리간예,간예결속후,채용억욱자평량표(SDS)、간역응대방식문권(SCSQ)화건강조사문권(SF-36)조사량조병인8주시적억욱상태、응대방식화생활질량.결과 간예조병인간예8주후SDS분수현저저우대조조(P＜0.05);간예조병인간예8주후SDS분수저우간예전(입원시),비교유통계학의의(P＜0.05).간예조적SCSQ재간예8주후적겁응대득분고우대조조(P＜0.05),소겁득분여대조조차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).간예조재간예8주시PF、SF、BP、MH사개유도득분고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).간예조간예8주후PF、RE、SF、BP、MH화GH륙개유도득분고우간예전(입원시),차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 대억욱증환자급여지지성호리간예능감경병인적억욱증상,제고기심리사회방면적생활질량,대병인진행지지성적호리간예구유중요의의.
Objective To study the influence of nursing intervention on the quality of life of depressed inpatients. Methods A total of 80 depressed inpatients were divided into intervention group and control group, each of 40 cases. Intervention group was received nursing intervention, while control group was received conventional care only, all patients were treated with antidepressant. Both two groups patients were assessed with SDS, SCSQ and SF - 36 at baseline, 8 - week. Results After 8 week intervention, the SDS scores of intervention group were lower than those of control group and before intervention (P ＜0. 05) . In the way of coping of intervention group, the scores of positive style were higher than those of control group in 8 - week (P ＜ 0.05 ) . The SF - 36 of intervention group, the scores of PF, SF,BP, MH were higher than those of control group in 8 - week ( P ＜ 0.05); the scores of PF, RE, SF, BP, MH, GH were higher than before intervention in 8 - week ( P ＜ 0. 05 ) . Conclusions The depressed in patients have an obvious low level of QOL, but they are able to be improved significantly with nursing intervention while they are treated with antidepressant.
