中南林业科技大学学报:社会科学版
中南林業科技大學學報:社會科學版
중남임업과기대학학보:사회과학판
2011年
4期
8-11
,共4页
低碳经济%可持续发展%哲学
低碳經濟%可持續髮展%哲學
저탄경제%가지속발전%철학
low-carbon economy%sustainable development%philosophy
低碳经济是目前全球经济的背景语境。当今国际社会,开始普遍反思工业化以来传统的高能耗高污染经济发展模式所带来的气候变化及其他环境问题,开始追求低碳经济的低能耗高清洁高效率的发展模式。正因为如此,国际范围内展开了一系列围绕“低碳”问题的经济、技术和政治博弈。这场错综复杂的博弈根源于目前低碳经济所面临的困惑:气候变暖的真实性;发展模式短期内彻底转变的难题;新能源技术的研发和应用瓶颈;全球碳分配、碳测算、碳交易的国际认同与法律保障等等。直面这些困惑,一方面应该确证超越困惑的哲学基础:可持续发展的哲学;另一方面应该寻求超越困惑的智慧:国家低碳经济战略的民族哲学思维。
低碳經濟是目前全毬經濟的揹景語境。噹今國際社會,開始普遍反思工業化以來傳統的高能耗高汙染經濟髮展模式所帶來的氣候變化及其他環境問題,開始追求低碳經濟的低能耗高清潔高效率的髮展模式。正因為如此,國際範圍內展開瞭一繫列圍繞“低碳”問題的經濟、技術和政治博弈。這場錯綜複雜的博弈根源于目前低碳經濟所麵臨的睏惑:氣候變暖的真實性;髮展模式短期內徹底轉變的難題;新能源技術的研髮和應用瓶頸;全毬碳分配、碳測算、碳交易的國際認同與法律保障等等。直麵這些睏惑,一方麵應該確證超越睏惑的哲學基礎:可持續髮展的哲學;另一方麵應該尋求超越睏惑的智慧:國傢低碳經濟戰略的民族哲學思維。
저탄경제시목전전구경제적배경어경。당금국제사회,개시보편반사공업화이래전통적고능모고오염경제발전모식소대래적기후변화급기타배경문제,개시추구저탄경제적저능모고청길고효솔적발전모식。정인위여차,국제범위내전개료일계렬위요“저탄”문제적경제、기술화정치박혁。저장착종복잡적박혁근원우목전저탄경제소면림적곤혹:기후변난적진실성;발전모식단기내철저전변적난제;신능원기술적연발화응용병경;전구탄분배、탄측산、탄교역적국제인동여법률보장등등。직면저사곤혹,일방면응해학증초월곤혹적철학기출:가지속발전적철학;령일방면응해심구초월곤혹적지혜:국가저탄경제전략적민족철학사유。
Low-carbon economy is the background of the current global economic context. Today's international community, since the begin- ning of industrialization in general reflect the high energy consumption of traditional high-polluting mode of economic development brought by climate change and other environmental issues, began to pursue a low carbon economy low energy high cleaning efficiency of development. Because of this, the International launched a series of focus within the "low carbon" problem of economic, technological and political game. This game, rooted in the complex low-carbon economy, is currently facing the confusion: the truth of climate change; development model completely changed the short term problem; new energy technology development and application bottlenecks; global carbon allocation, car bon estimates, carbon trading international recognition and legal protection and so on. Facing these puzzles, on the one hand, the philosophi- cal foundation of transcending the confusion, the philosophy of sustainable development, should be confirmed; the other hand, wisdom be- yond the confusion, philosophical thinking of national strategy for the national low-carbon economy, should be sought.