CAJ | 학술논문

无处分权人和相对人是无权处分合同的基本当事人,但由于处分财产属于权利人,因此权利人在无权处分合同中的地位还需进一步明确,笔者结合《合同法》第51条的规定,并区分无权处分合同最终结局的不同情形来分析无权处分合同的当事人。由于权利人与所处分财产的权属关系,如果权利人追认无权处分合同,那么结合笔者的＂新并存债务承担＂理论,应当允许权利人作为无权处分合同的浮动当事人。
무처분권인화상대인시무권처분합동적기본당사인,단유우처분재산속우권리인,인차권리인재무권처분합동중적지위환수진일보명학,필자결합《합동법》제51조적규정,병구분무권처분합동최종결국적불동정형래분석무권처분합동적당사인。유우권리인여소처분재산적권속관계,여과권리인추인무권처분합동,나요결합필자적＂신병존채무승담＂이론,응당윤허권리인작위무권처분합동적부동당사인。
The disposer without right and the counterpart are the basic parties of the unauthorized disposition contract.However,because the right to dispose property belongs to the legal owner,the position of the legal owner in unauthorized disposition contract needs to be further clarified.Based on the Article 51 of the PRC Contract Law,the author attempts to analyze the parties of unauthorized disposition contract by distinguishing the different final outcomes of unauthorized disposition contracts.As the disposed property belongs to the legal owner,if the legal owner consequently confirms the unauthorized disposition contract,the legal owner should be allowed to be the variable party of unauthorized disposition contract according to the author＇s theory of new concurrent debt obligation.