中华妇产科杂志
中華婦產科雜誌
중화부산과잡지
CHINESE JOUNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
2001年
3期
153-155
,共3页
孟祥兰%程琪辉%郗彦凤%丛娟%武春枝
孟祥蘭%程琪輝%郗彥鳳%叢娟%武春枝
맹상란%정기휘%치언봉%총연%무춘지
子宫内膜肿瘤%腺癌%外科手术方法,手术的%放射疗法
子宮內膜腫瘤%腺癌%外科手術方法,手術的%放射療法
자궁내막종류%선암%외과수술방법,수술적%방사요법
目的 比较不同治疗方法治疗子宫内膜腺癌的疗效。方法 386例患者分别给予以下3种不同的治疗方法,(1)单纯手术(手术组)145例;(2)手术+放射治疗(放疗,手术+放疗组)161例;(3)单纯放疗(放疗组)80例。治疗后随访均在5年以上,观察各组的5年生存率。结果 手术病理分期(放疗组为临床分期)Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期及Ⅲ~Ⅳ期的5年生存率,手术组分别为78.9%(56/71)、61.0%(25/41)及18.2%(6/33);手术+放疗组分别为75.0%(33/44)、59.5%(44/74)及48.8%(21/43);放疗组分别为34.8%(8/23)、18.8%(3/16)及0.0%(0/41)。Ⅰ期及Ⅱ期患者的5年生存率,手术组与手术+放疗组比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05),而Ⅲ~Ⅳ期手术+放疗组明显高于手术组(P<0.001);放疗组无论分期如何,其5年生存率均显著低于手术组和手术+放疗组(P<0.001)。结论 子宫内膜腺癌应尽量争取以手术为主的治疗,单纯放疗仅适于有手术禁忌证的患者。
目的 比較不同治療方法治療子宮內膜腺癌的療效。方法 386例患者分彆給予以下3種不同的治療方法,(1)單純手術(手術組)145例;(2)手術+放射治療(放療,手術+放療組)161例;(3)單純放療(放療組)80例。治療後隨訪均在5年以上,觀察各組的5年生存率。結果 手術病理分期(放療組為臨床分期)Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期及Ⅲ~Ⅳ期的5年生存率,手術組分彆為78.9%(56/71)、61.0%(25/41)及18.2%(6/33);手術+放療組分彆為75.0%(33/44)、59.5%(44/74)及48.8%(21/43);放療組分彆為34.8%(8/23)、18.8%(3/16)及0.0%(0/41)。Ⅰ期及Ⅱ期患者的5年生存率,手術組與手術+放療組比較,差異無顯著性(P>0.05),而Ⅲ~Ⅳ期手術+放療組明顯高于手術組(P<0.001);放療組無論分期如何,其5年生存率均顯著低于手術組和手術+放療組(P<0.001)。結論 子宮內膜腺癌應儘量爭取以手術為主的治療,單純放療僅適于有手術禁忌證的患者。
목적 비교불동치료방법치료자궁내막선암적료효。방법 386례환자분별급여이하3충불동적치료방법,(1)단순수술(수술조)145례;(2)수술+방사치료(방료,수술+방료조)161례;(3)단순방료(방료조)80례。치료후수방균재5년이상,관찰각조적5년생존솔。결과 수술병리분기(방료조위림상분기)Ⅰ기、Ⅱ기급Ⅲ~Ⅳ기적5년생존솔,수술조분별위78.9%(56/71)、61.0%(25/41)급18.2%(6/33);수술+방료조분별위75.0%(33/44)、59.5%(44/74)급48.8%(21/43);방료조분별위34.8%(8/23)、18.8%(3/16)급0.0%(0/41)。Ⅰ기급Ⅱ기환자적5년생존솔,수술조여수술+방료조비교,차이무현저성(P>0.05),이Ⅲ~Ⅳ기수술+방료조명현고우수술조(P<0.001);방료조무론분기여하,기5년생존솔균현저저우수술조화수술+방료조(P<0.001)。결론 자궁내막선암응진량쟁취이수술위주적치료,단순방료부괄우유수술금기증적환자。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of different remedis in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Methods Total of 386 patients with metracarcinoma underwent 3 different treatments: (1) operation only 145 cases; (2) operation and complemental radiotherapy 161 cases; (3) radiotherapy only 80 cases. Then they were followed up for 5 years and more. Results The 5-year survival rates of operation group were 78.9% (56/71), 61.0% (25/41) and 18.2% (6/33) in stage Ⅰ, stage Ⅱ, and stage Ⅲ~Ⅳ respectively, for operation and complemental radiotherapy,they were 75.0% (33/44), 59.5% (44/74) and 48.8% (21/43), for radiotherapy, 34.8% (8/23), 18.8% (3/16) and 0.0% (0/41). There was no difference between operation group and operation plus radiotherapy in patients with stage Ⅰ and stage Ⅱ (P>0.05). However the 5-year survival rates were significantly higher in operation plus complemental radiotherappy group and those only received operation in stage Ⅲ stage Ⅳ patients (P<0.001). And no matter in what stages, the therapeutic effect was worse in radiotherapy group than other two groups (P<0.001). Conclusion The remedis with operation as main measure are the best choice for metracarcinoma, radiotherapy merely is fit with those who can not be operated on.