国际检验医学杂志
國際檢驗醫學雜誌
국제검험의학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
2010年
2期
119-120
,共2页
王芳芳%刘玉梅%李光迪%尤崇革
王芳芳%劉玉梅%李光迪%尤崇革
왕방방%류옥매%리광적%우숭혁
视黄A醇结合蛋白质%指示剂和试剂%对比研究
視黃A醇結閤蛋白質%指示劑和試劑%對比研究
시황A순결합단백질%지시제화시제%대비연구
Retinol-Binding Proteins%Indicators and Reagents%Comparative Study
目的 观察两种不同的血清视黄醇结合蛋白(RBP)试剂在同一台生化分析仪上的检测结果是否具有可比性.方法 用两种试剂进行血清视黄醇结合蛋白测定,并对两种试剂的准确性、重复性、线性范围等结果进行了评价比较.结果 金斯尔试剂与北加试剂比较,两种试剂间健康对照组回归方程Y=1.011X、r~2=0.960 4,患者组回归方程Y=1.043 8X、r~2=0.965 7,r~2>0.95,测定高、低值质控品的相对偏差分别为-2.32%和-4.64%,其准确性偏差小于10%;高、低值质控品测定值的CV分别为0.9%和2.3%,患者标本测定值CV为1.3%,其重复性CV小于10%;在0.35~25 mg/Dl范围内,线性误差不超过10%.结论 北京九强公司的金斯尔血清视黄醇结合蛋白检测试剂与上海北加试剂其检测结果具有可比性,可用于临床血清视黄醇结合蛋白的测定.
目的 觀察兩種不同的血清視黃醇結閤蛋白(RBP)試劑在同一檯生化分析儀上的檢測結果是否具有可比性.方法 用兩種試劑進行血清視黃醇結閤蛋白測定,併對兩種試劑的準確性、重複性、線性範圍等結果進行瞭評價比較.結果 金斯爾試劑與北加試劑比較,兩種試劑間健康對照組迴歸方程Y=1.011X、r~2=0.960 4,患者組迴歸方程Y=1.043 8X、r~2=0.965 7,r~2>0.95,測定高、低值質控品的相對偏差分彆為-2.32%和-4.64%,其準確性偏差小于10%;高、低值質控品測定值的CV分彆為0.9%和2.3%,患者標本測定值CV為1.3%,其重複性CV小于10%;在0.35~25 mg/Dl範圍內,線性誤差不超過10%.結論 北京九彊公司的金斯爾血清視黃醇結閤蛋白檢測試劑與上海北加試劑其檢測結果具有可比性,可用于臨床血清視黃醇結閤蛋白的測定.
목적 관찰량충불동적혈청시황순결합단백(RBP)시제재동일태생화분석의상적검측결과시부구유가비성.방법 용량충시제진행혈청시황순결합단백측정,병대량충시제적준학성、중복성、선성범위등결과진행료평개비교.결과 금사이시제여북가시제비교,량충시제간건강대조조회귀방정Y=1.011X、r~2=0.960 4,환자조회귀방정Y=1.043 8X、r~2=0.965 7,r~2>0.95,측정고、저치질공품적상대편차분별위-2.32%화-4.64%,기준학성편차소우10%;고、저치질공품측정치적CV분별위0.9%화2.3%,환자표본측정치CV위1.3%,기중복성CV소우10%;재0.35~25 mg/Dl범위내,선성오차불초과10%.결론 북경구강공사적금사이혈청시황순결합단백검측시제여상해북가시제기검측결과구유가비성,가용우림상혈청시황순결합단백적측정.
Objective The evaluation and comparison of two different kinds of serum retinol-binding protein(RBP)reagents in the same biochemical analyzer.Methods Use the reagents of Shanghai Beijia biochemical reagents company and Beijing Jiuqiang biochemical limited company for serum retinol-binding protein determination.Their accuracy,repeatability,sensitivity,linear range and interference are compared.Results The results of Gcell reagents and Beijia reagents were evaluated,which regression equation wasY=1.011X,r~2=0.9604 in the normal group and y=1.043 8X,r~2=0.9657 in the patient group;The CV%of high-level and low-level controls were 0.9%and 2.3 0A respectively.The CV% of patients was 1.3%,The results range in 0.35~25 mg/dL,the linear error was less than 10%.Conclusion The results of Gcell reagents and Shanghai Beijia reagents are comparable and Gcell reagents can be safely used in clinical analysis.