CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨影响驾驶员驾驶适性的相关社会心理因素.方法采取分层整群抽样抽取870名机动车驾驶员,剔除肇事1～2次的驾驶员,最终选出620名符合研究条件的驾驶员,分为肇事组和非肇事组.采用一般人口学资料、生活事件量表、90项症状自评量表及艾森克人格问卷对其进行测试,并运用t检验和Fisher判别分析进行分析并建立驾驶适性判别函数.结果肇事组驾驶员正性生活事件、负性生活事件、家庭事件、工作事件、社交事件因子分别为9.62±11.36,4.67±6.25,34.53±30.01,6.38±10.15,24.05±23.09,6.48±9.43,16.78±17.12,3.96±6.55,2.82±5.07,2.02±5.43,均高于非肇事组驾驶员(P＜0.01).肇事组驾驶员的SCL-90总分及各因子分均高于非肇事组驾驶员(P＜0.01).艾森克个性问卷测评中肇事组驾驶员N、P维度分(56.32±8.77,5.22±10.43)均高于非肇事驾驶员(45.23±8.06,48.31±9.35),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).Fisher判别方程:F肇事组=0.258×X6+0.119×X9+0.637×X17+0.043×X5-7.476,F非肇事组=0.137×X6-1.000×X9+1.423×X17+0.003 ×X5-2.601.回代验证的判别总正确率为88.3%,前瞻性判别总正确率为88.0%.结论强迫、焦虑、情绪、负性事件与驾驶适性有显著的相关性.判别函数正确率高,对驾驶员选拔有重要意义,对减少交通事故的发生有重要作用.
목적 탐토영향가사원가사괄성적상관사회심리인소.방법 채취분층정군추양추취870명궤동차가사원,척제조사1～2차적가사원,최종선출620명부합연구조건적가사원,분위조사조화비조사조.채용일반인구학자료、생활사건량표、90항증상자평량표급애삼극인격문권대기진행측시,병운용t검험화Fisher판별분석진행분석병건립가사괄성판별함수.결과 조사조가사원정성생활사건、부성생활사건、가정사건、공작사건、사교사건인자분별위9.62±11.36,4.67±6.25,34.53±30.01,6.38±10.15,24.05±23.09,6.48±9.43,16.78±17.12,3.96±6.55,2.82±5.07,2.02±5.43,균고우비조사조가사원(P＜0.01).조사조가사원적SCL-90총분급각인자분균고우비조사조가사원(P＜0.01).애삼극개성문권측평중조사조가사원N、P유도분(56.32±8.77,5.22±10.43)균고우비조사가사원(45.23±8.06,48.31±9.35),차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01).Fisher판별방정:F조사조=0.258×X6+0.119×X9+0.637×X17+0.043×X5-7.476,F비조사조=0.137×X6-1.000×X9+1.423×X17+0.003 ×X5-2.601.회대험증적판별총정학솔위88.3%,전첨성판별총정학솔위88.0%.결론 강박、초필、정서、부성사건여가사괄성유현저적상관성.판별함수정학솔고,대가사원선발유중요의의,대감소교통사고적발생유중요작용.
Objective To discuss the impact of relevant psycho-social factors on the driving adaptability. Methods A total of 870 vehicle drivers were screened out by stratified cluster sampling,and 620 drivers were finally selected for this study after eliminating those who had 1 -2 accidents. The 620 drivers were divided into accident group and non-accident group. Demographic questionnaire, life event scale, SCL-90 Scale and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire were applied to investigate their general condition, life event, mental health and personality. All data were analyzed by t test and stepwise Fisher discriminatory, and then the discriminatory equations of driving eligibility were established. Results The scores of factors including positive life events, negative life events, family events, work events and social events in accident group were 9.62 ± 11.36, 34.53 ± 30.01, 24.05 ± 23.09, 16.78 ± 17. 12 and 2.82 ± 5.07, respectively, which were higher than 4.67 ± 6.25, 6.38 ± 10. 15, 6.48 ± 9.43, 3.96 ±6.55 and 2.02 ± 5.43 respectively in the non-accident group ( P ＜ 0. 01 ). The total SCL-90 score and the scores of all factors in the accident group were higher than those in the non-accident group ( P ＜0. 01 ). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire scores of the accident group were significantly higher than the non-accident group in N dimension ( 56. 32 ± 8.77 vs. 45.23 ± 8.06 ) and P dimension (52.22 ±10.43 vs. 48.31 ± 9.35 ) ( P ＜ 0. 01 ). Fisher discriminatory equations: Faccident group = 0. 258 × X6 + 0.119 ×X9 +0.637 ×X17 +0.043 × X5-7.476; Fnon-accident group =0. 137 × X6-1. 000 ×X9 + 1.423 ×X17 +0.003× X5-2.601. Total discrimination accuracy of verification was 88.3%, and the total accuracy of prospective discrimination was 88.0%. Conclusions There is clear correlation of driving adaptability with coercion, anxiety, emotion and negative factors. The discriminatory equations are useful for selecting drivers because of high accuracy, and may play an important role in reducing the occurrence of traffic accidents.