中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2010年
33期
3969-3973
,共5页
髋关节置换术%感觉%功能%量表%编制%评价
髖關節置換術%感覺%功能%量錶%編製%評價
관관절치환술%감각%공능%량표%편제%평개
Total hip arthroplasty%Perceptions%Function%Questionnaire%Development%Evaluation
目的 编制全髋关节置换病人感觉与功能评价量表(研究量表),并对该量表的信度、效度和反应度进行评价.方法 采用访谈法编制含有10个条目的研究量表,选取行全髋关节置换术的病人150例,分别在术前和术后第6个月使用研究量表、Harris评分量表和SF-36量表进行调查.结果 研究量表术前与术后的Cronbach'sα分别为0.84,0.89;重测信度r=0.87;与Harris量表的关联效度术前、术后分别为-0.66,-0.68;与SF-36的关联效度术前、术后分别-0.40,-0.47;反应尺度为2.63,大于SF-36量表,与Harris量表接近.结论 研究量表具有较好的内部一致性、重测信度、关联效度和反应度,并且测试简便、针对性强,可在全髋关节置换手术前后对病人的感觉与功能情况进行评价.
目的 編製全髖關節置換病人感覺與功能評價量錶(研究量錶),併對該量錶的信度、效度和反應度進行評價.方法 採用訪談法編製含有10箇條目的研究量錶,選取行全髖關節置換術的病人150例,分彆在術前和術後第6箇月使用研究量錶、Harris評分量錶和SF-36量錶進行調查.結果 研究量錶術前與術後的Cronbach'sα分彆為0.84,0.89;重測信度r=0.87;與Harris量錶的關聯效度術前、術後分彆為-0.66,-0.68;與SF-36的關聯效度術前、術後分彆-0.40,-0.47;反應呎度為2.63,大于SF-36量錶,與Harris量錶接近.結論 研究量錶具有較好的內部一緻性、重測信度、關聯效度和反應度,併且測試簡便、針對性彊,可在全髖關節置換手術前後對病人的感覺與功能情況進行評價.
목적 편제전관관절치환병인감각여공능평개량표(연구량표),병대해량표적신도、효도화반응도진행평개.방법 채용방담법편제함유10개조목적연구량표,선취행전관관절치환술적병인150례,분별재술전화술후제6개월사용연구량표、Harris평분량표화SF-36량표진행조사.결과 연구량표술전여술후적Cronbach'sα분별위0.84,0.89;중측신도r=0.87;여Harris량표적관련효도술전、술후분별위-0.66,-0.68;여SF-36적관련효도술전、술후분별-0.40,-0.47;반응척도위2.63,대우SF-36량표,여Harris량표접근.결론 연구량표구유교호적내부일치성、중측신도、관련효도화반응도,병차측시간편、침대성강,가재전관관절치환수술전후대병인적감각여공능정황진행평개.
Objective To develop a questionnaire on the perceptions and function of patients about total hip arthroplasty and evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsibility. Methods We developed a 10-item questionnaire for completion by patients having total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study of 150 patients was undertaken before operation and at follow-up six months later. Each completed the new questionnaire as well as the SF36 and the Harris. Results The Cronbach's α of the questionnaire before and after operation were 0. 84, 0. 89; test-retest reliability r = 0. 87; criterion related validity with Harris questionnaire before and after operation were - 0. 66, - 0. 68; criterion related validity with SF-36 before and after operation were - 0. 40, - 0. 47; responsive scale was 2.63, bigger than SF-36 questionnaire, close to Harris questionnaire. Conclusions The new questionnaire provides a measure of outcome for patients having total hip arthroplasty which is short, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes. It could be used to evaluate the patient's feeling and function situation before and after total hip arthroplasty operation.