中华核医学杂志
中華覈醫學雜誌
중화핵의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
2008年
6期
389-392
,共4页
孙龙%官泳松%方亚%潘卫民%陈贵兵%罗作明%魏继宏%吴华
孫龍%官泳鬆%方亞%潘衛民%陳貴兵%囉作明%魏繼宏%吳華
손룡%관영송%방아%반위민%진귀병%라작명%위계굉%오화
体层摄影术,发射型计算机%体层摄影术,X线计算机%肿瘤,诊断%鉴别
體層攝影術,髮射型計算機%體層攝影術,X線計算機%腫瘤,診斷%鑒彆
체층섭영술,발사형계산궤%체층섭영술,X선계산궤%종류,진단%감별
Tomography,emission-computed%Tomography,X-ray computed%Neoplasms%Diagnosis,differential
目的 评价一日法18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FIX;)PET/CT全身扫描联合18F-FDG PET/CT影像辅助CT引导下经皮穿刺活组织检查术用于恶性实体肿瘤分期与定性诊断的临床价值.方法 16例实体占位病变患者,全部行一日内全身18F-FDG PET/CT扫描结合18F-FDG PET/CT影像辅助CY引导下经皮穿刺活组织检查术.每例患者的2种检查均在同一台PET/CT扫描仪上完成.共获18份适合病理分析的标本.分别以活组织检查标本结合外科术后病理检查,或临床随访结果为依据,建立最后诊断.采用SPSS 13.0软件,对2种检查结果进行比较(Fisher精确概率法).结果 16例患者中,最后诊断恶性12例,良性4例.有10例18F-FDG;PET/CT影像诊断与穿刺活组织病理检查结果一致.10例18F-FDG PET/CT诊断为恶性病变者中,最终诊断为恶性8例,良性2例.6例18F-FDGPET/CT诊断为良性者中,最终诊断为良性2例,恶性4例.穿刺活组织检查结果与最后手术病理检查和随访诊断结果全部符合.PET/CT影像诊断与穿刺活组织检查结果之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.604).所有最后诊断为恶性实体肿瘤的患者,定性与分期在一日内完成;诊断为良性者则规定门诊长期随访,排除假阴性.穿刺获取组织学标本时间为平均每例15 min.该组病例均无严重并发症发生.结论 全身18F-FDG PET/CT扫描联合18F-FDG PET/CT影像辅助CT引导下经皮穿刺活组织检查术,有助于提高PET/CT诊断效能与穿刺活组织检查的成功率与准确性.当18F-FDG PET/CT影像诊断出现定性困难时,其价值尤为明显.
目的 評價一日法18F-脫氧葡萄糖(FIX;)PET/CT全身掃描聯閤18F-FDG PET/CT影像輔助CT引導下經皮穿刺活組織檢查術用于噁性實體腫瘤分期與定性診斷的臨床價值.方法 16例實體佔位病變患者,全部行一日內全身18F-FDG PET/CT掃描結閤18F-FDG PET/CT影像輔助CY引導下經皮穿刺活組織檢查術.每例患者的2種檢查均在同一檯PET/CT掃描儀上完成.共穫18份適閤病理分析的標本.分彆以活組織檢查標本結閤外科術後病理檢查,或臨床隨訪結果為依據,建立最後診斷.採用SPSS 13.0軟件,對2種檢查結果進行比較(Fisher精確概率法).結果 16例患者中,最後診斷噁性12例,良性4例.有10例18F-FDG;PET/CT影像診斷與穿刺活組織病理檢查結果一緻.10例18F-FDG PET/CT診斷為噁性病變者中,最終診斷為噁性8例,良性2例.6例18F-FDGPET/CT診斷為良性者中,最終診斷為良性2例,噁性4例.穿刺活組織檢查結果與最後手術病理檢查和隨訪診斷結果全部符閤.PET/CT影像診斷與穿刺活組織檢查結果之間差異無統計學意義(P=0.604).所有最後診斷為噁性實體腫瘤的患者,定性與分期在一日內完成;診斷為良性者則規定門診長期隨訪,排除假陰性.穿刺穫取組織學標本時間為平均每例15 min.該組病例均無嚴重併髮癥髮生.結論 全身18F-FDG PET/CT掃描聯閤18F-FDG PET/CT影像輔助CT引導下經皮穿刺活組織檢查術,有助于提高PET/CT診斷效能與穿刺活組織檢查的成功率與準確性.噹18F-FDG PET/CT影像診斷齣現定性睏難時,其價值尤為明顯.
목적 평개일일법18F-탈양포도당(FIX;)PET/CT전신소묘연합18F-FDG PET/CT영상보조CT인도하경피천자활조직검사술용우악성실체종류분기여정성진단적림상개치.방법 16례실체점위병변환자,전부행일일내전신18F-FDG PET/CT소묘결합18F-FDG PET/CT영상보조CY인도하경피천자활조직검사술.매례환자적2충검사균재동일태PET/CT소묘의상완성.공획18빈괄합병리분석적표본.분별이활조직검사표본결합외과술후병리검사,혹림상수방결과위의거,건립최후진단.채용SPSS 13.0연건,대2충검사결과진행비교(Fisher정학개솔법).결과 16례환자중,최후진단악성12례,량성4례.유10례18F-FDG;PET/CT영상진단여천자활조직병리검사결과일치.10례18F-FDG PET/CT진단위악성병변자중,최종진단위악성8례,량성2례.6례18F-FDGPET/CT진단위량성자중,최종진단위량성2례,악성4례.천자활조직검사결과여최후수술병리검사화수방진단결과전부부합.PET/CT영상진단여천자활조직검사결과지간차이무통계학의의(P=0.604).소유최후진단위악성실체종류적환자,정성여분기재일일내완성;진단위량성자칙규정문진장기수방,배제가음성.천자획취조직학표본시간위평균매례15 min.해조병례균무엄중병발증발생.결론 전신18F-FDG PET/CT소묘연합18F-FDG PET/CT영상보조CT인도하경피천자활조직검사술,유조우제고PET/CT진단효능여천자활조직검사적성공솔여준학성.당18F-FDG PET/CT영상진단출현정성곤난시,기개치우위명현.
Objective It is well known that 18F-fluorodeoxyghicose (FDG) PET/CT might have false-positive and false-negative results in differentiating malignant from benign lesions. This study was to e-valuate the value of combining 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging with PET/CT guided tissue core biopsy on the same day so to improve the overall diagnostic capability. Methods Sixteen consecutive patients with de-tectable lesions underwent CT guided tissue core biopsy assisted by 18F-FDG PET/CT images after whole body PET/CT scan on a same-day protocol. The biopsy procedure took an average of 15 win. A total of 18samples were obtained for subsequent histological examinations. The final diagnosis was established by sur-gical or biopsy pathological findings and clinical follow-up. SPSS 13.0 and Fisher Exact Test were used to analyze the diagnostic ability of PET/CT alone and PET/CT combining with guided biopsy. Results Of these 16 patients, 12 were finally diagnosed as malignant and 4 as benign. Out of the 10 cases that had been considered as malignant based on 18F-FDG PET/CT scans, 8 were finally confirmed as malignant (TP) and 2 as benign (FP). Of the 6 lesions that were judged as benign on 18F-FDG PET/CT images, 2 were proven as benign (TN) and 4 as malignant (FN). Fisher's Exact Test showed that the difference between the re-suits of 18F-FDG PET/CT and tissue core biopsy was not statistically significant (P=0.604). No serious complication in biopsy was found. Conclusion The combination of 18F-FDG PET/CT and its guided tissue core biopsy may improve the diagnostic capability, especially in cases when a definitive diagnosis by PET/CT alone is difficult to make.