中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中華勞動衛生職業病雜誌
중화노동위생직업병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
2010年
10期
766-771
,共6页
徐进%朱猛%蔡宏铨%张凯%段巍巍%王婷%王莉%王莎莎%叶洋%倪春辉
徐進%硃猛%蔡宏銓%張凱%段巍巍%王婷%王莉%王莎莎%葉洋%倪春輝
서진%주맹%채굉전%장개%단외외%왕정%왕리%왕사사%협양%예춘휘
尘肺%多态性,单核苷酸%疾病易感性
塵肺%多態性,單覈苷痠%疾病易感性
진폐%다태성,단핵감산%질병역감성
Pneumoconiosis%Polymorphism,single nucleotide%Disease,susceptibility
目的 探讨SMAD4基因单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)与煤工尘肺易感性的关系.方法 采用病例-对照的研究方法,选择438例煤工尘肺患者为病例组,448例同单位、同工种、工龄接近、无尘肺的煤尘接触者为对照组,进行统一的问卷调查;拍摄高仟伏X线后前位胸片;采集外周静脉血,酚-氯仿法提取DNA;根据中国人群HapMap database数据库查找SNP位点,多聚酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性(PCR-RFLP)方法检测SMAD4 6个SNPs位点的基因型.结果 6个SNPs位点的基因型分布频率中,仅SMAD4(rs10502913)病例组和对照组各基因型分布频率比较,差异有统计学意义(x2=6.512,P=0.038).携带SMAD4(rs10502913)AA基因型者发生煤工尘肺的危险性明显增高(调整后OR=1.63,95%CI=1.00~2.69,P=0.05);以是否吸烟为分层分析显示,携带SMAD4(rs10502913)AG基因型的不吸烟者发生煤工尘肺的危险性降低(调整后OR=0.54,95%CI=0.37~0.78,P<0.01),而携带SMAD4(rs10502913)AG、AA基因型的吸烟者发生煤工尘肺危险性均增高(AG调整后OR=1.59,95%CI=1.01~2.50,P<0.05;AA调整后OR=2.28,95%CI=1.09~4.80,P<0.05);以煤工尘肺分期为分层分析显示,Ⅰ期尘肺组携带SMAD4(rs10502913)AA基因型者发生尘肺的危险性是携带GG型的2.42倍(调整后OR=2.42,95%CI=1.41~4.14,P<0.01).携带SMAD4(rs9304407)GG基因型者煤工尘肺患病危险性与CC基因型比较明显降低(调整后OR=0.65,95%CI=0.43~0.98,P<0.05);以是否吸烟为分层分析显示,不吸烟携带SMAD4(rs9304407)GC、GG基因型者发生煤工尘肺危险性明显降低(GC基因型调整后OR=0.60,95%CI=0.36~1.00,P<0.05;GG基因型调整后OR=0.43,95%CI=0.25~0.74,P<0.01).结论 SMAD4(rs10502913)位点AA基因型增加了煤工尘肺的危险性,SMAD4(rs9304407)位点GG基因型可能在尘肺的发生发展中起保护性作用.
目的 探討SMAD4基因單覈苷痠多態性(SNPs)與煤工塵肺易感性的關繫.方法 採用病例-對照的研究方法,選擇438例煤工塵肺患者為病例組,448例同單位、同工種、工齡接近、無塵肺的煤塵接觸者為對照組,進行統一的問捲調查;拍攝高仟伏X線後前位胸片;採集外週靜脈血,酚-氯倣法提取DNA;根據中國人群HapMap database數據庫查找SNP位點,多聚酶鏈反應-限製性片段長度多態性(PCR-RFLP)方法檢測SMAD4 6箇SNPs位點的基因型.結果 6箇SNPs位點的基因型分佈頻率中,僅SMAD4(rs10502913)病例組和對照組各基因型分佈頻率比較,差異有統計學意義(x2=6.512,P=0.038).攜帶SMAD4(rs10502913)AA基因型者髮生煤工塵肺的危險性明顯增高(調整後OR=1.63,95%CI=1.00~2.69,P=0.05);以是否吸煙為分層分析顯示,攜帶SMAD4(rs10502913)AG基因型的不吸煙者髮生煤工塵肺的危險性降低(調整後OR=0.54,95%CI=0.37~0.78,P<0.01),而攜帶SMAD4(rs10502913)AG、AA基因型的吸煙者髮生煤工塵肺危險性均增高(AG調整後OR=1.59,95%CI=1.01~2.50,P<0.05;AA調整後OR=2.28,95%CI=1.09~4.80,P<0.05);以煤工塵肺分期為分層分析顯示,Ⅰ期塵肺組攜帶SMAD4(rs10502913)AA基因型者髮生塵肺的危險性是攜帶GG型的2.42倍(調整後OR=2.42,95%CI=1.41~4.14,P<0.01).攜帶SMAD4(rs9304407)GG基因型者煤工塵肺患病危險性與CC基因型比較明顯降低(調整後OR=0.65,95%CI=0.43~0.98,P<0.05);以是否吸煙為分層分析顯示,不吸煙攜帶SMAD4(rs9304407)GC、GG基因型者髮生煤工塵肺危險性明顯降低(GC基因型調整後OR=0.60,95%CI=0.36~1.00,P<0.05;GG基因型調整後OR=0.43,95%CI=0.25~0.74,P<0.01).結論 SMAD4(rs10502913)位點AA基因型增加瞭煤工塵肺的危險性,SMAD4(rs9304407)位點GG基因型可能在塵肺的髮生髮展中起保護性作用.
목적 탐토SMAD4기인단핵감산다태성(SNPs)여매공진폐역감성적관계.방법 채용병례-대조적연구방법,선택438례매공진폐환자위병례조,448례동단위、동공충、공령접근、무진폐적매진접촉자위대조조,진행통일적문권조사;박섭고천복X선후전위흉편;채집외주정맥혈,분-록방법제취DNA;근거중국인군HapMap database수거고사조SNP위점,다취매련반응-한제성편단장도다태성(PCR-RFLP)방법검측SMAD4 6개SNPs위점적기인형.결과 6개SNPs위점적기인형분포빈솔중,부SMAD4(rs10502913)병례조화대조조각기인형분포빈솔비교,차이유통계학의의(x2=6.512,P=0.038).휴대SMAD4(rs10502913)AA기인형자발생매공진폐적위험성명현증고(조정후OR=1.63,95%CI=1.00~2.69,P=0.05);이시부흡연위분층분석현시,휴대SMAD4(rs10502913)AG기인형적불흡연자발생매공진폐적위험성강저(조정후OR=0.54,95%CI=0.37~0.78,P<0.01),이휴대SMAD4(rs10502913)AG、AA기인형적흡연자발생매공진폐위험성균증고(AG조정후OR=1.59,95%CI=1.01~2.50,P<0.05;AA조정후OR=2.28,95%CI=1.09~4.80,P<0.05);이매공진폐분기위분층분석현시,Ⅰ기진폐조휴대SMAD4(rs10502913)AA기인형자발생진폐적위험성시휴대GG형적2.42배(조정후OR=2.42,95%CI=1.41~4.14,P<0.01).휴대SMAD4(rs9304407)GG기인형자매공진폐환병위험성여CC기인형비교명현강저(조정후OR=0.65,95%CI=0.43~0.98,P<0.05);이시부흡연위분층분석현시,불흡연휴대SMAD4(rs9304407)GC、GG기인형자발생매공진폐위험성명현강저(GC기인형조정후OR=0.60,95%CI=0.36~1.00,P<0.05;GG기인형조정후OR=0.43,95%CI=0.25~0.74,P<0.01).결론 SMAD4(rs10502913)위점AA기인형증가료매공진폐적위험성,SMAD4(rs9304407)위점GG기인형가능재진폐적발생발전중기보호성작용.
Objective To explore whether 6 tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within SMAD4 gene were involved in the genetic susceptibility of coal worker's pneumoconiosis (CWP) by case-control study. Methods This study consisted of 438 CWP patients and 448 controls. All study subjects were Han Chinese, underground coal miners and recruited from coal mines of Xuzhou Mining Business Group Co Ltd.The 5 ml venous blood sample was obtained from all studied subjects and extracted genome DNA from the isolated leucocytes. Six SNPs were selected from the HapMap and detected by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism(PCR-RFLP). Results The single SNP analyses showed that the genotype frequencies of SMAD4 (rs 10502913) was significantly different from those in controls (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that SMAD4 (rs10502913) AA genotype was associated with increased risk of CWP (adjusted OR=1.63,95%CI=1.00-2.69,P=0.05) and this was evident among subgroups of those smoker (adjusted OR =2.28,95% CI= 1.09~4.80, P<0.05 ) and cases with stage Ⅰ (adjusted OR=2.42,95% CI=1.41~4.14,P<0.01 ). The SMAD4 (rs9304407) GG genotype was associated with an decreased risk of CWP (adjusted OR=0.65,95%CI=0.43~0.98 ,P<0.05 ) and the further stratification analysis showed that the risk of CWP was decreased in nonsmoking groups. Conclusions Our results suggest that individuals with the SMAD4(rs10502913) AA genotype was associated with an increased risk of CWP. However, carriers of SMAD4 (rs9304407) GG genotype have a protective effect on the developing CWP.