中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2008年
11期
45-46
,共2页
赵晓丽%黄秋华%申琳%潘光珍%吴莉%齐会萍
趙曉麗%黃鞦華%申琳%潘光珍%吳莉%齊會萍
조효려%황추화%신림%반광진%오리%제회평
鼻部手术%镇痛%甘露醇%吸氧
鼻部手術%鎮痛%甘露醇%吸氧
비부수술%진통%감로순%흡양
Nasal operation%Analgesia%Mannitol%Oxygen inhalation
目的 研究低流量吸氧和静脉注射甘露醇联合应用对鼻部手术后的镇痛效果,探讨鼻部手术后缓解疼痛的有效方法.方法 将160例鼻部手术患者随机分为A、B、C、D 4组,每组各40例.术后A组给予20%甘露醇125 ml静脉注射,B组用鼻导管经口低流量吸氧,C组同时给予20%甘露醇125ml静脉注射和鼻导管经口低流量吸氧,D组为对照组,进行常规护理.采用McGill疼痛评估方法,观察4组镇痛效果.结果 疼痛评分:C组低于A、B组,A、B组低于D组(P<0.01).鼻部肿胀程度:C组较B组(P<0.01)和A组(P<0.05)轻,A组较D组轻(P<0.01),B组与D组比较差异无统计学意义.结论 采用低流量吸氧和静脉注射甘露醇能缓解鼻部手术后疼痛,两者联合应用效果更好.
目的 研究低流量吸氧和靜脈註射甘露醇聯閤應用對鼻部手術後的鎮痛效果,探討鼻部手術後緩解疼痛的有效方法.方法 將160例鼻部手術患者隨機分為A、B、C、D 4組,每組各40例.術後A組給予20%甘露醇125 ml靜脈註射,B組用鼻導管經口低流量吸氧,C組同時給予20%甘露醇125ml靜脈註射和鼻導管經口低流量吸氧,D組為對照組,進行常規護理.採用McGill疼痛評估方法,觀察4組鎮痛效果.結果 疼痛評分:C組低于A、B組,A、B組低于D組(P<0.01).鼻部腫脹程度:C組較B組(P<0.01)和A組(P<0.05)輕,A組較D組輕(P<0.01),B組與D組比較差異無統計學意義.結論 採用低流量吸氧和靜脈註射甘露醇能緩解鼻部手術後疼痛,兩者聯閤應用效果更好.
목적 연구저류량흡양화정맥주사감로순연합응용대비부수술후적진통효과,탐토비부수술후완해동통적유효방법.방법 장160례비부수술환자수궤분위A、B、C、D 4조,매조각40례.술후A조급여20%감로순125 ml정맥주사,B조용비도관경구저류량흡양,C조동시급여20%감로순125ml정맥주사화비도관경구저류량흡양,D조위대조조,진행상규호리.채용McGill동통평고방법,관찰4조진통효과.결과 동통평분:C조저우A、B조,A、B조저우D조(P<0.01).비부종창정도:C조교B조(P<0.01)화A조(P<0.05)경,A조교D조경(P<0.01),B조여D조비교차이무통계학의의.결론 채용저류량흡양화정맥주사감로순능완해비부수술후동통,량자연합응용효과경호.
Objective To describe the analgesic effect of low-flow rate oxygen inhalation with intravenous mannitol injection for patients after nasal operation and seek for effective method for allevia-tion of pain.Methods 160 patients were divided into group A,B,C and D with 40 cases in each group.Group A received intravenous injection of 125 ml of 20%mannitol and group B got low-flow rate oxygen inhalation through nasal canulas.While group C were given the combination of treatment in that of group A and group B.Group D was named the control group and only adopted routine nursing.The pain alleviation effect was observed by McGill pain evaluation method.Results The score of pain in group C was lower than those in group A and B.While the scores of pain in group A and B were lower than that in group D(P<0.01).Conclusion The nasal swelling in group C lightened compared with those of group B (P<0.01)and group A(P<0.05).The nasal swelling in group A was lighter than that of group D but no difference Was seen between group B and group D