CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨首都医学发展科研基金立项指标体系的基本构成及其合理性,为进一步建立和完善首都医学发展科研基金立项评估指标体系提供实践和理论基础.方法采用问卷调查方式对北京市33名医院科研管理人员进行调查,采用分半信度、克朗巴赫a系数进行问卷信度评价,采用内容效度和结构效度进行问卷效度考评.结果被调查者对一、二级指标的认可度均在87.88%以上;指标体系的分半信度为0.7933;克朗巴赫α系数为0.9103,内部一致性信度较高;二级指标因子分析共提取4个公因子,累积贡献率达到78.44%.结论首都医学发展科研基金立项指标体系基本构成合理可行,为进一步研究奠定了基础.
목적 탐토수도의학발전과연기금립항지표체계적기본구성급기합이성,위진일보건립화완선수도의학발전과연기금립항평고지표체계제공실천화이론기출.방법 채용문권조사방식대북경시33명의원과연관리인원진행조사,채용분반신도、극랑파혁a계수진행문권신도평개,채용내용효도화결구효도진행문권효도고평.결과 피조사자대일、이급지표적인가도균재87.88%이상;지표체계적분반신도위0.7933;극랑파혁α계수위0.9103,내부일치성신도교고;이급지표인자분석공제취4개공인자,루적공헌솔체도78.44%.결론 수도의학발전과연기금립항지표체계기본구성합리가행,위진일보연구전정료기출.
Objective To evaluate the reasonability and feasibility of evaluation index system for the Capital Research Fund for Medical Development in order to provide some preliminary practical and theo-retical fundamentals for setting up and improving an evaluation index system for the Capital Research Foun-dation for Medical Development. Methods Based on the investigation of thirty three hospital's administra-tors in Beijing,we used statistical methods to evaluate the reliability and validity of the evaluation index sys-tem. Results The first grade and second grade index were approved by more than 87.88% responders;the half-reliability of the evaluation index system was 0.7933 and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0.9103, the factor analysis of the second grade indicators showed that there were four factors extracted, and the accu-mulative variance reached 78.44%. Conclusion The evaluation index system for the Capital Research Fund for Medical Development is reasonable and feasible,and the research result will provide a basis for fur-ther study.