环境科学研究
環境科學研究
배경과학연구
RSEARCH OF ENUIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
2009年
12期
1445-1451
,共7页
夏凤英%曹云者%李政一%施烈焰%李发生
夏鳳英%曹雲者%李政一%施烈燄%李髮生
하봉영%조운자%리정일%시렬염%리발생
土壤标准%RBCA模型%CLEA模型%苯并[a]芘
土壤標準%RBCA模型%CLEA模型%苯併[a]芘
토양표준%RBCA모형%CLEA모형%분병[a]비
soil pollutant standards%RBCA model%CLEA model%benzo[a]pyrene
我国现行土壤环境质量标准中尚未包含苯并[a]芘(B[a]P). 分别应用2种国际上认可的RBCA和CLEA模型,获取了土壤中B[a]P的标准值,并对2种模型的计算结果和取值进行了比较. 结果表明,在目标风险水平设定为10~(-5)时,RBCA和CLEA模型计算的住宅用地土壤B[a]P标准值分别为0.83和1.21 mg/kg;工业用地标准值分别为4.10和26.30 mg/kg. 2种模型住宅用地的标准差异不大,且与其他国家的标准水平基本接近;工业用地的标准差异较大,其中RBCA模型的结果更接近于其他国家标准,而CLEA模型的结果则明显偏高. 造成2种模型计算结果差异的原因主要来自于两方面,即模型的方法原理不同导致的暴露量计算差异以及采用的毒理学数据来源不同导致的数据水平差异. 2种模型暴露途径解析的结果均表明,经口摄入和皮肤接触是土壤污染物B[a]P人体暴露的主要途径,而口鼻吸入导致的暴露量很小.
我國現行土壤環境質量標準中尚未包含苯併[a]芘(B[a]P). 分彆應用2種國際上認可的RBCA和CLEA模型,穫取瞭土壤中B[a]P的標準值,併對2種模型的計算結果和取值進行瞭比較. 結果錶明,在目標風險水平設定為10~(-5)時,RBCA和CLEA模型計算的住宅用地土壤B[a]P標準值分彆為0.83和1.21 mg/kg;工業用地標準值分彆為4.10和26.30 mg/kg. 2種模型住宅用地的標準差異不大,且與其他國傢的標準水平基本接近;工業用地的標準差異較大,其中RBCA模型的結果更接近于其他國傢標準,而CLEA模型的結果則明顯偏高. 造成2種模型計算結果差異的原因主要來自于兩方麵,即模型的方法原理不同導緻的暴露量計算差異以及採用的毒理學數據來源不同導緻的數據水平差異. 2種模型暴露途徑解析的結果均錶明,經口攝入和皮膚接觸是土壤汙染物B[a]P人體暴露的主要途徑,而口鼻吸入導緻的暴露量很小.
아국현행토양배경질량표준중상미포함분병[a]비(B[a]P). 분별응용2충국제상인가적RBCA화CLEA모형,획취료토양중B[a]P적표준치,병대2충모형적계산결과화취치진행료비교. 결과표명,재목표풍험수평설정위10~(-5)시,RBCA화CLEA모형계산적주택용지토양B[a]P표준치분별위0.83화1.21 mg/kg;공업용지표준치분별위4.10화26.30 mg/kg. 2충모형주택용지적표준차이불대,차여기타국가적표준수평기본접근;공업용지적표준차이교대,기중RBCA모형적결과경접근우기타국가표준,이CLEA모형적결과칙명현편고. 조성2충모형계산결과차이적원인주요래자우량방면,즉모형적방법원리불동도치적폭로량계산차이이급채용적독이학수거래원불동도치적수거수평차이. 2충모형폭로도경해석적결과균표명,경구섭입화피부접촉시토양오염물B[a]P인체폭로적주요도경,이구비흡입도치적폭로량흔소.
Current soil quality standards in China do not yet include benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P). In this research, soil standards of B[a]P were calculated using two environmental risk assessment models, the Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) model and the Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEA) model. Calculated results derived by these two models were compared. The results showed that, under the target risk level of 10~(-5), the standard of B[a]P for residential land use derived by the RBCA and CLEA models was 0.83 and 1.21 mg/kg respectively, and the standard for industrial land use was 4.10 and 26.30 mg/kg respectively. For residential land use, the calculated standards by the two models were close to each other and also close to the standards of other countries. However, for industrial land use, significant difference existed between the calculated standards from the two models. The results of the RBCA model were close to the standard levels of other countries, while the results of CLEA were significantly higher. The difference in the results from these two models was in two main aspects: one was the difference of exposure assessment led by different principles and algorithms of the two models, and the other was the difference in source and data level adopted in B[a]P toxicology data. Both results of the two models showed that oral ingestion and dermal exposure pathways were the main ways by which the human body was exposed to B[a]P in soil, and the exposure caused by the inhalation pathway was small.