中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2011年
20期
2760-2761
,共2页
带状疱疹后遗神经痛%皮下埋针%紫外线
帶狀皰疹後遺神經痛%皮下埋針%紫外線
대상포진후유신경통%피하매침%자외선
PHN%Intravenous catheter%UVB
目的 评价皮下埋针联合紫外线照射治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛(PHN)的疗效。方法 96例PHN患者随机分为三组，各32例。治疗组采用皮下埋针与UVB照射联合治疗，对照组A单用皮下埋针治疗，对照组B单用UVB照射治疗。结果 治疗组患者痊愈率为87.50％，总有效率为96.88％，平均起效时间为1.55 d均优于对照A组的62.50％、81.25％、2.48d和对照B组的6.25％、68.75％、7.41 d(x2 =5.33，42.42，4.59，8.89，t =22.96、11.96,P＜0.01或P＜0.05)，且A组痊愈率和平均起效时间均优于B组(x2=22.44,t =29.30，均P＜0.01)，但总有效率差异无统计学意义(t=21.39，P＞0.05)。结论 皮下埋针联合UVB照射在治疗PHN上明显优于单用皮下埋针或单用UVB照射治疗。
目的 評價皮下埋針聯閤紫外線照射治療帶狀皰疹後遺神經痛(PHN)的療效。方法 96例PHN患者隨機分為三組，各32例。治療組採用皮下埋針與UVB照射聯閤治療，對照組A單用皮下埋針治療，對照組B單用UVB照射治療。結果 治療組患者痊愈率為87.50％，總有效率為96.88％，平均起效時間為1.55 d均優于對照A組的62.50％、81.25％、2.48d和對照B組的6.25％、68.75％、7.41 d(x2 =5.33，42.42，4.59，8.89，t =22.96、11.96,P＜0.01或P＜0.05)，且A組痊愈率和平均起效時間均優于B組(x2=22.44,t =29.30，均P＜0.01)，但總有效率差異無統計學意義(t=21.39，P＞0.05)。結論 皮下埋針聯閤UVB照射在治療PHN上明顯優于單用皮下埋針或單用UVB照射治療。
목적 평개피하매침연합자외선조사치료대상포진후유신경통(PHN)적료효。방법 96례PHN환자수궤분위삼조，각32례。치료조채용피하매침여UVB조사연합치료，대조조A단용피하매침치료，대조조B단용UVB조사치료。결과 치료조환자전유솔위87.50％，총유효솔위96.88％，평균기효시간위1.55 d균우우대조A조적62.50％、81.25％、2.48d화대조B조적6.25％、68.75％、7.41 d(x2 =5.33，42.42，4.59，8.89，t =22.96、11.96,P＜0.01혹P＜0.05)，차A조전유솔화평균기효시간균우우B조(x2=22.44,t =29.30，균P＜0.01)，단총유효솔차이무통계학의의(t=21.39，P＞0.05)。결론 피하매침연합UVB조사재치료PHN상명현우우단용피하매침혹단용UVB조사치료。
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intravenous catheter in combination with ultraviolet radiation for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).Methods 96 patients with PHN were randonly divided into three groups.Intravenous catheter plus UVB radiation was given in the test group(32 patients).Intravenous catheter or UVB radiation was only given in two control groups (32 patients/group), respectively.Results The total effective rate in the test group was 96.88％ (31/32) and the average onset time was 1.55 days.However,the total effective rate in two control groups was 81.25％ (26/32) and 68.75％ (22/32) ,and the average onset time was 2.48 days and 7.41days.There was a statistical difference observed in curative rate (x2 = 5.33,42.42, P ＜ 0.05 or P ＜ 0.01), the total effective rate(x2 =4.59,8.89,P＜0.05 or P＜0.01) and the average onset time(t =22.96,11.96,all P＜0.01)between the test group and two control groups.Moreove,there was also a statistical difference observed in curative rate (x2 = 22.44, P ＜ 0.001) and the average onset time (t = 29.30, P ＜ 0.01) between two control groups.Conclusion Intravenous catheter in combination with UVB radiation was much better than intravenous catheter or UVB radiation only in the treatment of PHN.
